Exploring Error Types in Formal Languages Among Students of Upper Secondary Education
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.15043v1
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2024 14:16:13 GMT
- Title: Exploring Error Types in Formal Languages Among Students of Upper Secondary Education
- Authors: Marko Schmellenkamp, Dennis Stanglmair, Tilman Michaeli, Thomas Zeume,
- Abstract summary: We report on an exploratory study of errors in formal languages among upper secondary education students.
Our results suggest instances of non-functional understanding of concepts.
These findings can serve as a starting point for a broader understanding of how and why students struggle with this topic.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Foundations of formal languages, as subfield of theoretical computer science, are part of typical upper secondary education curricula. There is very little research on the potential difficulties that students at this level have with this subject. In this paper, we report on an exploratory study of errors in formal languages among upper secondary education students. We collect the data by posing exercises in an intelligent tutoring system and analyzing student input. Our results suggest a) instances of non-functional understanding of concepts such as the empty word or a grammar as a substitution system; b) strategic problems such as lack of foresight when deriving a word or confounding formal specifications with real-world knowledge on certain aspects; and c) various syntactic problems. These findings can serve as a starting point for a broader understanding of how and why students struggle with this topic.
Related papers
- Logical Modelling in CS Education: Bridging the Natural Language Gap [0.0]
An important learning objective for computer science students is to learn how to formalize descriptions of real world scenarios.
We propose a conceptual framework for educational tasks where students choose a vocabulary.
We implement educational tasks for designing propositional and first-order vocabularies within the Iltis educational system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-30T07:34:41Z) - EventGround: Narrative Reasoning by Grounding to Eventuality-centric Knowledge Graphs [41.928535719157054]
We propose an initial comprehensive framework called EventGround to tackle the problem of grounding free-texts to eventuality-centric knowledge graphs.
We provide simple yet effective parsing and partial information extraction methods to tackle these problems.
Our framework, incorporating grounded knowledge, achieves state-of-the-art performance while providing interpretable evidence.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-30T01:16:37Z) - Representing Pedagogic Content Knowledge Through Rough Sets [0.0]
The paper is meant for rough set researchers intending to build logical models or develop meaning-aware AI-software to aid teachers.
The main advantage of the proposed approach is in its ability to coherently handle vagueness, multi-modality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-26T11:00:45Z) - Teacher Perception of Automatically Extracted Grammar Concepts for L2
Language Learning [66.79173000135717]
We apply this work to teaching two Indian languages, Kannada and Marathi, which do not have well-developed resources for second language learning.
We extract descriptions from a natural text corpus that answer questions about morphosyntax (learning of word order, agreement, case marking, or word formation) and semantics (learning of vocabulary).
We enlist the help of language educators from schools in North America to perform a manual evaluation, who find the materials have potential to be used for their lesson preparation and learner evaluation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-27T18:17:29Z) - Three Questions Concerning the Use of Large Language Models to
Facilitate Mathematics Learning [4.376598435975689]
We discuss the challenges associated with employing large language models to enhance students' mathematical problem-solving skills.
LLMs can generate the wrong reasoning processes, and also exhibit difficulty in understanding the given questions' rationales when attempting to correct students' answers.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T16:05:35Z) - Solving Quantitative Reasoning Problems with Language Models [53.53969870599973]
We introduce Minerva, a large language model pretrained on general natural language data and further trained on technical content.
The model achieves state-of-the-art performance on technical benchmarks without the use of external tools.
We also evaluate our model on over two hundred undergraduate-level problems in physics, biology, chemistry, economics, and other sciences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-29T18:54:49Z) - Teacher Perception of Automatically Extracted Grammar Concepts for L2
Language Learning [91.49622922938681]
We present an automatic framework that automatically discovers and visualizing descriptions of different aspects of grammar.
Specifically, we extract descriptions from a natural text corpus that answer questions about morphosyntax and semantics.
We apply this method for teaching the Indian languages, Kannada and Marathi, which, unlike English, do not have well-developed pedagogical resources.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-10T14:52:22Z) - Why are NLP Models Fumbling at Elementary Math? A Survey of Deep
Learning based Word Problem Solvers [7.299537282917047]
We critically examine the various models that have been developed for solving word problems.
We take a step back and analyse why, in spite of this abundance in scholarly interest, the predominantly used experiment and dataset designs continue to be a stumbling block.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-31T10:51:25Z) - Formal Mathematics Statement Curriculum Learning [64.45821687940946]
We show that at same compute budget, expert iteration, by which we mean proof search interleaved with learning, dramatically outperforms proof search only.
We also observe that when applied to a collection of formal statements of sufficiently varied difficulty, expert iteration is capable of finding and solving a curriculum of increasingly difficult problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-03T00:17:00Z) - Automatic Generation of Word Problems for Academic Education via Natural
Language Processing (NLP) [0.0]
This thesis proposes an approach to generate diverse, context rich word problems.
The proposed approach is proven to be effective in generating valid word problems for mathematical statistics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-27T15:36:19Z) - A Matter of Framing: The Impact of Linguistic Formalism on Probing
Results [69.36678873492373]
Deep pre-trained contextualized encoders like BERT (Delvin et al.) demonstrate remarkable performance on a range of downstream tasks.
Recent research in probing investigates the linguistic knowledge implicitly learned by these models during pre-training.
Can the choice of formalism affect probing results?
We find linguistically meaningful differences in the encoding of semantic role- and proto-role information by BERT depending on the formalism.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-30T17:45:16Z) - Heterogeneous Representation Learning: A Review [66.12816399765296]
Heterogeneous Representation Learning (HRL) brings some unique challenges.
We present a unified learning framework which is able to model most existing learning settings with the heterogeneous inputs.
We highlight the challenges that are less-touched in HRL and present future research directions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-28T05:12:31Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.