LML-DAP: Language Model Learning a Dataset for Data-Augmented Prediction

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.18957v3
• Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 03:45:30 GMT
• Title: LML-DAP: Language Model Learning a Dataset for Data-Augmented Prediction
• Authors: Praneeth Vadlapati,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a new approach for classification tasks using Large Language Models (LLMs) in an explainable method. The classification is performed by LLMs using a method similar to that used by humans who manually explore and understand the data to decide classifications. The system scored an accuracy above 90% in some test cases, confirming the effectiveness and potential of the system to outperform Machine Learning models in various scenarios.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Classification tasks are typically handled using Machine Learning (ML) models, which lack a balance between accuracy and interpretability. This paper introduces a new approach for classification tasks using Large Language Models (LLMs) in an explainable method. Unlike ML models, which rely heavily on data cleaning and feature engineering, this method streamlines the process using LLMs. This paper proposes a method called "Language Model Learning (LML)" powered by a new method called "Data-Augmented Prediction (DAP)." The classification is performed by LLMs using a method similar to that used by humans who manually explore and understand the data to decide classifications. In the process of LML, a dataset is summarized and evaluated to determine the features leading to each label the most. In the DAP process, the system uses the data summary and a row of the testing dataset to automatically generate a query to retrieve relevant rows from the dataset for context-aware classification. LML and DAP unlock new possibilities in areas that require explainable and context-aware decisions by ensuring satisfactory accuracy even with complex data. The system scored an accuracy above 90% in some test cases, confirming the effectiveness and potential of the system to outperform ML models in various scenarios. The source code is available at https://github.com/Pro-GenAI/LML-DAP

Related papers

• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• Verbalized Machine Learning: Revisiting Machine Learning with Language Models [63.10391314749408]
  We introduce the framework of verbalized machine learning (VML) VML constrains the parameter space to be human-interpretable natural language. We empirically verify the effectiveness of VML, and hope that VML can serve as a stepping stone to stronger interpretability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:59:56Z)
• Are you still on track!? Catching LLM Task Drift with Activations [55.75645403965326]
  Task drift allows attackers to exfiltrate data or influence the LLM's output for other users. We show that a simple linear classifier can detect drift with near-perfect ROC AUC on an out-of-distribution test set. We observe that this approach generalizes surprisingly well to unseen task domains, such as prompt injections, jailbreaks, and malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T16:53:21Z)
• ANLS* -- A Universal Document Processing Metric for Generative Large Language Models [40.94659575657584]
  This paper introduces a new metric for evaluating generative models called ANLS*. The ANLS* metric extends existing ANLS metrics as a drop-in-replacement and is still compatible with previously reported ANLS scores. We also benchmark a novel approach to generate prompts for documents, called SFT, against other prompting techniques such as LATIN.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T09:50:08Z)
• LLMaAA: Making Large Language Models as Active Annotators [32.57011151031332]
  We propose LLMaAA, which takes large language models as annotators and puts them into an active learning loop to determine what to annotate efficiently. We conduct experiments and analysis on two classic NLP tasks, named entity recognition and relation extraction. With LLMaAA, task-specific models trained from LLM-generated labels can outperform the teacher within only hundreds of annotated examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T14:54:15Z)
• Large Language Model-Aware In-Context Learning for Code Generation [75.68709482932903]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive in-context learning (ICL) ability in code generation. We propose a novel learning-based selection approach named LAIL (LLM-Aware In-context Learning) for code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-15T06:12:58Z)
• MLLM-DataEngine: An Iterative Refinement Approach for MLLM [62.30753425449056]
  We propose a novel closed-loop system that bridges data generation, model training, and evaluation. Within each loop, the MLLM-DataEngine first analyze the weakness of the model based on the evaluation results. For targeting, we propose an Adaptive Bad-case Sampling module, which adjusts the ratio of different types of data. For quality, we resort to GPT-4 to generate high-quality data with each given data type.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-25T01:41:04Z)
• From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
  We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets. Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z)
• Interpret-able feedback for AutoML systems [5.5524559605452595]
  Automated machine learning (AutoML) systems aim to enable training machine learning (ML) models for non-ML experts. A shortcoming of these systems is that when they fail to produce a model with high accuracy, the user has no path to improve the model. We introduce an interpretable data feedback solution for AutoML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-22T18:54:26Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.