Automatic debiasing of neural networks via moment-constrained learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2409.19777v1
• Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 20:56:54 GMT
• Title: Automatic debiasing of neural networks via moment-constrained learning
• Authors: Christian L. Hines, Oliver J. Hines,
• Abstract summary: Naively learning the regression function and taking a sample mean of the target functional results in biased estimators. We propose moment-constrained learning as a new RR learning approach that addresses some shortcomings in automatic debiasing.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Causal and nonparametric estimands in economics and biostatistics can often be viewed as the mean of a linear functional applied to an unknown outcome regression function. Naively learning the regression function and taking a sample mean of the target functional results in biased estimators, and a rich debiasing literature has developed where one additionally learns the so-called Riesz representer (RR) of the target estimand (targeted learning, double ML, automatic debiasing etc.). Learning the RR via its derived functional form can be challenging, e.g. due to extreme inverse probability weights or the need to learn conditional density functions. Such challenges have motivated recent advances in automatic debiasing (AD), where the RR is learned directly via minimization of a bespoke loss. We propose moment-constrained learning as a new RR learning approach that addresses some shortcomings in AD, constraining the predicted moments and improving the robustness of RR estimates to optimization hyperparamters. Though our approach is not tied to a particular class of learner, we illustrate it using neural networks, and evaluate on the problems of average treatment/derivative effect estimation using semi-synthetic data. Our numerical experiments show improved performance versus state of the art benchmarks.

Related papers

• Non-Asymptotic Uncertainty Quantification in High-Dimensional Learning [5.318766629972959]
  Uncertainty quantification is a crucial but challenging task in many high-dimensional regression or learning problems. We develop a new data-driven approach for UQ in regression that applies both to classical regression approaches as well as to neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T16:42:10Z)
• Learning Latent Graph Structures and their Uncertainty [63.95971478893842]
  Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) use relational information as an inductive bias to enhance the model's accuracy. As task-relevant relations might be unknown, graph structure learning approaches have been proposed to learn them while solving the downstream prediction task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T10:49:22Z)
• Instance-based Learning with Prototype Reduction for Real-Time Proportional Myocontrol: A Randomized User Study Demonstrating Accuracy-preserving Data Reduction for Prosthetic Embedded Systems [0.0]
  This work presents the design, implementation and validation of learning techniques based on the kNN scheme for gesture detection in prosthetic control. The influence of parameterization and varying proportionality schemes is analyzed, utilizing an eight-channel-sEMG armband.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T20:15:35Z)
• Learning Low Dimensional State Spaces with Overparameterized Recurrent Neural Nets [57.06026574261203]
  We provide theoretical evidence for learning low-dimensional state spaces, which can also model long-term memory. Experiments corroborate our theory, demonstrating extrapolation via learning low-dimensional state spaces with both linear and non-linear RNNs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-25T14:45:15Z)
• Less is More: Rethinking Few-Shot Learning and Recurrent Neural Nets [2.824895388993495]
  We provide theoretical guarantees for reliable learning under the information-theoretic AEP. We then focus on a highly efficient recurrent neural net (RNN) framework and propose a reduced-entropy algorithm for few-shot learning. Our experimental results demonstrate significant potential for improving learning models' sample efficiency, generalization, and time complexity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-28T17:33:11Z)
• Near-optimal Offline Reinforcement Learning with Linear Representation: Leveraging Variance Information with Pessimism [65.46524775457928]
  offline reinforcement learning seeks to utilize offline/historical data to optimize sequential decision-making strategies. We study the statistical limits of offline reinforcement learning with linear model representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-11T09:00:12Z)
• Domain-Adjusted Regression or: ERM May Already Learn Features Sufficient for Out-of-Distribution Generalization [52.7137956951533]
  We argue that devising simpler methods for learning predictors on existing features is a promising direction for future research. We introduce Domain-Adjusted Regression (DARE), a convex objective for learning a linear predictor that is provably robust under a new model of distribution shift. Under a natural model, we prove that the DARE solution is the minimax-optimal predictor for a constrained set of test distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T16:42:16Z)
• Imputation-Free Learning from Incomplete Observations [73.15386629370111]
  We introduce the importance of guided gradient descent (IGSGD) method to train inference from inputs containing missing values without imputation. We employ reinforcement learning (RL) to adjust the gradients used to train the models via back-propagation. Our imputation-free predictions outperform the traditional two-step imputation-based predictions using state-of-the-art imputation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-05T12:44:39Z)
• Robust Learning via Persistency of Excitation [4.674053902991301]
  We show that network training using gradient descent is equivalent to a dynamical system parameter estimation problem. We provide an efficient technique for estimating the corresponding Lipschitz constant using extreme value theory. Our approach also universally increases the adversarial accuracy by 0.1% to 0.3% points in various state-of-the-art adversarially trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T18:49:05Z)
• Vulnerability Under Adversarial Machine Learning: Bias or Variance? [77.30759061082085]
  We investigate the effect of adversarial machine learning on the bias and variance of a trained deep neural network. Our analysis sheds light on why the deep neural networks have poor performance under adversarial perturbation. We introduce a new adversarial machine learning algorithm with lower computational complexity than well-known adversarial machine learning strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-01T00:58:54Z)
• Parsimonious Computing: A Minority Training Regime for Effective Prediction in Large Microarray Expression Data Sets [20.894226248856313]
  We propose a novel method for carrying out gene expression inference on large microarray data sets with a shallow architecture constrained by limited computing resources. A combination of random sub-sampling of the dataset, an adaptive Lipschitz constant inspired learning rate and a new activation function, A-ReLU helped accomplish the results reported in the paper.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T03:45:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.