Thinking Outside of the Differential Privacy Box: A Case Study in Text Privatization with Language Model Prompting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.00751v1
• Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 14:46:15 GMT
• Title: Thinking Outside of the Differential Privacy Box: A Case Study in Text Privatization with Language Model Prompting
• Authors: Stephen Meisenbacher, Florian Matthes,
• Abstract summary: We discuss the restrictions that Differential Privacy (DP) integration imposes, as well as bring to light the challenges that such restrictions entail. Our results demonstrate the need for more discussion on the usability of DP in NLP and its benefits over non-DP approaches.
• Score: 3.3916160303055567
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The field of privacy-preserving Natural Language Processing has risen in popularity, particularly at a time when concerns about privacy grow with the proliferation of Large Language Models. One solution consistently appearing in recent literature has been the integration of Differential Privacy (DP) into NLP techniques. In this paper, we take these approaches into critical view, discussing the restrictions that DP integration imposes, as well as bring to light the challenges that such restrictions entail. To accomplish this, we focus on $\textbf{DP-Prompt}$, a recent method for text privatization leveraging language models to rewrite texts. In particular, we explore this rewriting task in multiple scenarios, both with DP and without DP. To drive the discussion on the merits of DP in NLP, we conduct empirical utility and privacy experiments. Our results demonstrate the need for more discussion on the usability of DP in NLP and its benefits over non-DP approaches.

Related papers

• On the Impact of Noise in Differentially Private Text Rewriting [3.0177210416625124]
  We introduce a new sentence infilling privatization technique, and we use this method to explore the effect of noise in DP text rewriting. We empirically demonstrate that non-DP privatization techniques excel in utility preservation and can find an acceptable empirical privacy-utility trade-off, yet cannot outperform DP methods in empirical privacy protections.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T10:45:24Z)
• Natural Language Processing of Privacy Policies: A Survey [2.4058538793689497]
  We conduct a literature review by analyzing 109 papers at the intersection of NLP and privacy policies. We provide a brief introduction to privacy policies and discuss various facets of associated problems. We identify the methodologies that can be further enhanced to provide robust privacy policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-17T17:47:15Z)
• Mind the Privacy Unit! User-Level Differential Privacy for Language Model Fine-Tuning [62.224804688233]
  differential privacy (DP) offers a promising solution by ensuring models are 'almost indistinguishable' with or without any particular privacy unit. We study user-level DP motivated by applications where it necessary to ensure uniform privacy protection across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T13:54:32Z)
• Can LLMs Keep a Secret? Testing Privacy Implications of Language Models via Contextual Integrity Theory [82.7042006247124]
  We show that even the most capable AI models reveal private information in contexts that humans would not, 39% and 57% of the time, respectively. Our work underscores the immediate need to explore novel inference-time privacy-preserving approaches, based on reasoning and theory of mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-27T04:15:30Z)
• PrivacyMind: Large Language Models Can Be Contextual Privacy Protection Learners [81.571305826793]
  We introduce Contextual Privacy Protection Language Models (PrivacyMind) Our work offers a theoretical analysis for model design and benchmarks various techniques. In particular, instruction tuning with both positive and negative examples stands out as a promising method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T22:37:01Z)
• DP-BART for Privatized Text Rewriting under Local Differential Privacy [2.45626162429986]
  We propose a new system 'DP-BART' that largely outperforms existing LDP systems. Our approach uses a novel clipping method, iterative pruning, and further training of internal representations which drastically reduces the amount of noise required for DP guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-15T13:07:34Z)
• Differentially Private Natural Language Models: Recent Advances and Future Directions [25.6006170131504]
  Differential Privacy (DP) is becoming a de facto technique for private data analysis. This paper provides the first systematic review of recent advances in DP deep learning models in NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-22T12:29:03Z)
• PLUE: Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark for Privacy Policies in English [77.79102359580702]
  We introduce the Privacy Policy Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark, a multi-task benchmark for evaluating the privacy policy language understanding. We also collect a large corpus of privacy policies to enable privacy policy domain-specific language model pre-training. We demonstrate that domain-specific continual pre-training offers performance improvements across all tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-20T05:58:32Z)
• Privacy Amplification via Shuffling for Linear Contextual Bandits [51.94904361874446]
  We study the contextual linear bandit problem with differential privacy (DP) We show that it is possible to achieve a privacy/utility trade-off between JDP and LDP by leveraging the shuffle model of privacy. Our result shows that it is possible to obtain a tradeoff between JDP and LDP by leveraging the shuffle model while preserving local privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-11T15:23:28Z)
• Differentially Private Representation for NLP: Formal Guarantee and An Empirical Study on Privacy and Fairness [38.90014773292902]
  It has been demonstrated that hidden representation learned by a deep model can encode private information of the input. We propose Differentially Private Neural Representation (DPNR) to preserve the privacy of the extracted representation from text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-03T05:58:32Z)
• Private Reinforcement Learning with PAC and Regret Guarantees [69.4202374491817]
  We design privacy preserving exploration policies for episodic reinforcement learning (RL) We first provide a meaningful privacy formulation using the notion of joint differential privacy (JDP) We then develop a private optimism-based learning algorithm that simultaneously achieves strong PAC and regret bounds, and enjoys a JDP guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-18T20:18:35Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.