RGD: Multi-LLM Based Agent Debugger via Refinement and Generation Guidance
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01242v2
- Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 13:12:24 GMT
- Title: RGD: Multi-LLM Based Agent Debugger via Refinement and Generation Guidance
- Authors: Haolin Jin, Zechao Sun, Huaming Chen,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown incredible potential in code generation tasks.
LLMs can generate code based on task descriptions, but accuracy remains limited.
We introduce a novel architecture of LLM-based agents for code generation and automatic debug: Refinement and Guidance debugger (RGD)
RGD decomposes the code generation task into multiple steps, ensuring a clearer workflow and enabling iterative code refinement based on self-reflection and feedback.
- Score: 0.6062751776009752
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown incredible potential in code generation tasks, and recent research in prompt engineering have enhanced LLMs' understanding of textual information. However, ensuring the accuracy of generated code often requires extensive testing and validation by programmers. While LLMs can typically generate code based on task descriptions, their accuracy remains limited, especially for complex tasks that require a deeper understanding of both the problem statement and the code generation process. This limitation is primarily due to the LLMs' need to simultaneously comprehend text and generate syntactically and semantically correct code, without having the capability to automatically refine the code. In real-world software development, programmers rarely produce flawless code in a single attempt based on the task description alone, they rely on iterative feedback and debugging to refine their programs. Inspired by this process, we introduce a novel architecture of LLM-based agents for code generation and automatic debugging: Refinement and Guidance Debugging (RGD). The RGD framework is a multi-LLM-based agent debugger that leverages three distinct LLM agents-Guide Agent, Debug Agent, and Feedback Agent. RGD decomposes the code generation task into multiple steps, ensuring a clearer workflow and enabling iterative code refinement based on self-reflection and feedback. Experimental results demonstrate that RGD exhibits remarkable code generation capabilities, achieving state-of-the-art performance with a 9.8% improvement on the HumanEval dataset and a 16.2% improvement on the MBPP dataset compared to the state-of-the-art approaches and traditional direct prompting approaches. We highlight the effectiveness of the RGD framework in enhancing LLMs' ability to generate and refine code autonomously.
Related papers
- Guided Code Generation with LLMs: A Multi-Agent Framework for Complex Code Tasks [1.9198713957364215]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in code generation tasks.
They face significant limitations in handling complex, long-context programming challenges.
This paper introduces a novel agentic framework for guided code generation''
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-11T19:21:53Z) - Reference Trustable Decoding: A Training-Free Augmentation Paradigm for Large Language Models [79.41139393080736]
Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly advanced and demonstrated impressive capabilities.
In-Context Learning (ICL) and.
Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) are currently two mainstream methods for augmenting.
LLMs to downstream tasks.
We propose Reference Trustable Decoding (RTD), a paradigm that allows models to quickly adapt to new tasks without fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-30T10:48:20Z) - COAST: Enhancing the Code Debugging Ability of LLMs through Communicative Agent Based Data Synthesis [29.667170755786508]
We introduce EVAL, a benchmark for evaluating the abilities of Large Language Models.
We propose the COmmunicative Agent-based data SynThesis framework, which employs a multi-agent system to generate high-quality training data.
Results demonstrate that COAST-generated data outperform human-curated and GPT-4-generated data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-09T11:35:44Z) - What's Wrong with Your Code Generated by Large Language Models? An Extensive Study [80.18342600996601]
Large language models (LLMs) produce code that is shorter yet more complicated as compared to canonical solutions.
We develop a taxonomy of bugs for incorrect codes that includes three categories and 12 sub-categories, and analyze the root cause for common bug types.
We propose a novel training-free iterative method that introduces self-critique, enabling LLMs to critique and correct their generated code based on bug types and compiler feedback.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-08T17:27:17Z) - Validating LLM-Generated Programs with Metamorphic Prompt Testing [8.785973653167112]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into the software development lifecycle.
This paper proposes a novel solution called metamorphic prompt testing to address these challenges.
Our evaluation on HumanEval shows that metamorphic prompt testing is able to detect 75 percent of the erroneous programs generated by GPT-4, with a false positive rate of 8.6 percent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T00:40:17Z) - AlchemistCoder: Harmonizing and Eliciting Code Capability by Hindsight Tuning on Multi-source Data [64.69872638349922]
We present AlchemistCoder, a series of Code LLMs with enhanced code generation and generalization capabilities fine-tuned on multi-source data.
We propose incorporating the data construction process into the fine-tuning data as code comprehension tasks, including instruction evolution, data filtering, and code review.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-29T16:57:33Z) - CodeIP: A Grammar-Guided Multi-Bit Watermark for Large Language Models of Code [56.019447113206006]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable progress in code generation.
CodeIP is a novel multi-bit watermarking technique that inserts additional information to preserve provenance details.
Experiments conducted on a real-world dataset across five programming languages demonstrate the effectiveness of CodeIP.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T04:25:04Z) - StepCoder: Improve Code Generation with Reinforcement Learning from
Compiler Feedback [58.20547418182074]
We introduce StepCoder, a novel framework for code generation, consisting of two main components.
CCCS addresses the exploration challenge by breaking the long sequences code generation task into a Curriculum of Code Completion Subtasks.
FGO only optimize the model by masking the unexecuted code segments to provide Fine-Grained Optimization.
Our method improves the ability to explore the output space and outperforms state-of-the-art approaches in corresponding benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-02T13:14:31Z) - If LLM Is the Wizard, Then Code Is the Wand: A Survey on How Code
Empowers Large Language Models to Serve as Intelligent Agents [81.60906807941188]
Large language models (LLMs) are trained on a combination of natural language and formal language (code)
Code translates high-level goals into executable steps, featuring standard syntax, logical consistency, abstraction, and modularity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-01T16:51:20Z) - Bridging Code Semantic and LLMs: Semantic Chain-of-Thought Prompting for
Code Generation [22.219645213202178]
This paper proposes the "Semantic Chain-of-Thought" approach to intruduce semantic information of code, named SeCoT.
We show that SeCoT can achieves state-of-the-art performance, greatly improving the potential for large models and code generation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-16T05:09:58Z) - Fixing Large Language Models' Specification Misunderstanding for Better Code Generation [13.494822086550604]
muFiX is a novel prompting technique to improve the code generation performance of large language models (LLMs)
It first exploits test case analysis to obtain specification understanding and enables a self-improvement process.
muFiX further fixes the specification understanding towards the direction reducing the gap between the provided understanding and the actual understanding.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-28T02:58:07Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.