Enhancing Training Data Attribution for Large Language Models with Fitting Error Consideration
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01285v1
- Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 07:14:26 GMT
- Title: Enhancing Training Data Attribution for Large Language Models with Fitting Error Consideration
- Authors: Kangxi Wu, Liang Pang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a novel training data attribution method called Debias and Denoise Attribution (DDA)
Our method significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving an averaged AUC of 91.64%.
DDA exhibits strong generality and scalability across various sources and different-scale models like LLaMA2, QWEN2, and Mistral.
- Score: 74.09687562334682
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: The black-box nature of large language models (LLMs) poses challenges in interpreting results, impacting issues such as data intellectual property protection and hallucination tracing. Training data attribution (TDA) methods are considered effective solutions to address these challenges. Most recent TDA methods rely on influence functions, assuming the model achieves minimized empirical risk. However, achieving this criterion is difficult, and sourcing accuracy can be compromised by fitting errors during model training. In this paper, we introduce a novel TDA method called Debias and Denoise Attribution (DDA), which enhances influence functions by addressing fitting errors. Specifically, the debias strategy seeks to improve the performance of influence functions by eliminating the knowledge bias present in the base model before fine-tuning, while the denoise strategy aims to reduce discrepancies in influence scores arising from varying degrees of fitting during the training process through smoothing techniques. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving an averaged AUC of 91.64%. Moreover, DDA exhibits strong generality and scalability across various sources and different-scale models like LLaMA2, QWEN2, and Mistral.
Related papers
- Influence Functions for Scalable Data Attribution in Diffusion Models [52.92223039302037]
Diffusion models have led to significant advancements in generative modelling.
Yet their widespread adoption poses challenges regarding data attribution and interpretability.
In this paper, we aim to help address such challenges by developing an textitinfluence functions framework.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T17:59:02Z) - Wireless Channel Aware Data Augmentation Methods for Deep Learning-Based Indoor Localization [22.76179980847908]
We propose methods that utilize the domain knowledge about wireless propagation channels and devices.
We show that in the low-data regime, localization accuracy increases up to 50%, matching non-augmented results in the high-data regime.
The proposed methods may outperform the measurement-only high-data performance by up to 33% using only 1/4 of the amount of measured data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-12T19:01:49Z) - Low-rank finetuning for LLMs: A fairness perspective [54.13240282850982]
Low-rank approximation techniques have become the de facto standard for fine-tuning Large Language Models.
This paper investigates the effectiveness of these methods in capturing the shift of fine-tuning datasets from the initial pre-trained data distribution.
We show that low-rank fine-tuning inadvertently preserves undesirable biases and toxic behaviors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-28T20:43:53Z) - STAR: Constraint LoRA with Dynamic Active Learning for Data-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Language Models [21.929902181609936]
We propose a novel approach to integrate uncertainty-based active learning and LoRA.
For the uncertainty gap, we introduce a dynamic uncertainty measurement that combines the uncertainty of the base model and the uncertainty of the full model.
For poor model calibration, we incorporate the regularization method during LoRA training to keep the model from being over-confident.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-02T10:38:10Z) - The Effect of Balancing Methods on Model Behavior in Imbalanced
Classification Problems [4.370097023410272]
Imbalanced data poses a challenge in classification as model performance is affected by insufficient learning from minority classes.
This study addresses a more challenging aspect of balancing methods - their impact on model behavior.
To capture these changes, Explainable Artificial Intelligence tools are used to compare models trained on datasets before and after balancing.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-30T22:25:01Z) - Diffusion Denoising Process for Perceptron Bias in Out-of-distribution
Detection [67.49587673594276]
We introduce a new perceptron bias assumption that suggests discriminator models are more sensitive to certain features of the input, leading to the overconfidence problem.
We demonstrate that the diffusion denoising process (DDP) of DMs serves as a novel form of asymmetric, which is well-suited to enhance the input and mitigate the overconfidence problem.
Our experiments on CIFAR10, CIFAR100, and ImageNet show that our method outperforms SOTA approaches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-21T08:45:08Z) - A New Knowledge Distillation Network for Incremental Few-Shot Surface
Defect Detection [20.712532953953808]
This paper proposes a new knowledge distillation network, called Dual Knowledge Align Network (DKAN)
The proposed DKAN method follows a pretraining-finetuning transfer learning paradigm and a knowledge distillation framework is designed for fine-tuning.
Experiments have been conducted on the incremental Few-shot NEU-DET dataset and results show that DKAN outperforms other methods on various few-shot scenes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-01T15:08:44Z) - Discriminator-Guided Model-Based Offline Imitation Learning [11.856949845359853]
offline imitation learning (IL) is a powerful method to solve decision-making problems from expert demonstrations without reward labels.
We propose the Discriminator-guided Model-based offline Learning (DMIL) framework, which introduces a discriminator to simultaneously distinguish the dynamics correctness and suboptimality of model rollout data.
Experimental results show that DMIL and its extension achieve superior performance and robustness compared to state-of-the-art offline IL methods under small datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-01T07:28:18Z) - Scale-Equivalent Distillation for Semi-Supervised Object Detection [57.59525453301374]
Recent Semi-Supervised Object Detection (SS-OD) methods are mainly based on self-training, generating hard pseudo-labels by a teacher model on unlabeled data as supervisory signals.
We analyze the challenges these methods meet with the empirical experiment results.
We introduce a novel approach, Scale-Equivalent Distillation (SED), which is a simple yet effective end-to-end knowledge distillation framework robust to large object size variance and class imbalance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-23T07:33:37Z) - Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution
Shifts [49.58991359544005]
PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method.
We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.