Assisted Data Annotation for Business Process Information Extraction from Textual Documents

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01356v1
• Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 09:14:39 GMT
• Title: Assisted Data Annotation for Business Process Information Extraction from Textual Documents
• Authors: Julian Neuberger, Han van der Aa, Lars Ackermann, Daniel Buschek, Jannic Herrmann, Stefan Jablonski,
• Abstract summary: Machine-learning based generation of process models from natural language text process descriptions provides a solution for the time-intensive and expensive process discovery phase. We present two assistance features to support dataset creation, a recommendation system for identifying process information in the text and visualization of the current state of already identified process information as a graphical business process model. A controlled user study with 31 participants shows that assisting dataset creators with recommendations lowers all aspects of workload, up to $-51.0%$, and significantly improves annotation quality, up to $+38.9%$.
• Score: 15.770020803430246
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine-learning based generation of process models from natural language text process descriptions provides a solution for the time-intensive and expensive process discovery phase. Many organizations have to carry out this phase, before they can utilize business process management and its benefits. Yet, research towards this is severely restrained by an apparent lack of large and high-quality datasets. This lack of data can be attributed to, among other things, an absence of proper tool assistance for dataset creation, resulting in high workloads and inferior data quality. We explore two assistance features to support dataset creation, a recommendation system for identifying process information in the text and visualization of the current state of already identified process information as a graphical business process model. A controlled user study with 31 participants shows that assisting dataset creators with recommendations lowers all aspects of workload, up to $-51.0\%$, and significantly improves annotation quality, up to $+38.9\%$. We make all data and code available to encourage further research on additional novel assistance strategies.

Related papers

• A Universal Prompting Strategy for Extracting Process Model Information from Natural Language Text using Large Language Models [0.8899670429041453]
  We show that generative large language models (LLMs) can solve NLP tasks with very high quality without the need for extensive data. Based on a novel prompting strategy, we show that LLMs are able to outperform state-of-the-art machine learning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T06:39:35Z)
• AvaTaR: Optimizing LLM Agents for Tool Usage via Contrastive Reasoning [93.96463520716759]
  Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities in utilizing external tools and knowledge to boost accuracy and hallucinations. Here, we introduce AvaTaR, a novel and automated framework that optimize an LLM agent to effectively leverage provided tools, improving performance on a given task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T04:20:02Z)
• Leveraging Data Augmentation for Process Information Extraction [0.0]
  We investigate the application of data augmentation for natural language text data. Data augmentation is an important component in enabling machine learning methods for the task of business process model generation from natural language text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T06:32:03Z)
• A Survey on Data Selection for Language Models [148.300726396877]
  Data selection methods aim to determine which data points to include in a training dataset. Deep learning is mostly driven by empirical evidence and experimentation on large-scale data is expensive. Few organizations have the resources for extensive data selection research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T18:54:35Z)
• Capture the Flag: Uncovering Data Insights with Large Language Models [90.47038584812925]
  This study explores the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate the discovery of insights in data. We propose a new evaluation methodology based on a "capture the flag" principle, measuring the ability of such models to recognize meaningful and pertinent information (flags) in a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T14:20:06Z)
• STAR: Boosting Low-Resource Information Extraction by Structure-to-Text Data Generation with Large Language Models [56.27786433792638]
  STAR is a data generation method that leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to synthesize data instances. We design fine-grained step-by-step instructions to obtain the initial data instances. Our experiments show that the data generated by STAR significantly improve the performance of low-resource event extraction and relation extraction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T12:15:19Z)
• Process-BERT: A Framework for Representation Learning on Educational Process Data [68.8204255655161]
  We propose a framework for learning representations of educational process data. Our framework consists of a pre-training step that uses BERT-type objectives to learn representations from sequential process data. We apply our framework to the 2019 nation's report card data mining competition dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-28T16:07:28Z)
• SemTUI: a Framework for the Interactive Semantic Enrichment of Tabular Data [0.0]
  SemTUI is a framework to make the enrichment process flexible, complete, and effective through the use of semantics. A task-driven user evaluation proved SemTUI to be understandable, usable, and capable of achieving table enrichment with little effort and time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-17T17:14:21Z)
• Nemo: Guiding and Contextualizing Weak Supervision for Interactive Data Programming [77.38174112525168]
  We present Nemo, an end-to-end interactive Supervision system that improves overall productivity of WS learning pipeline by an average 20% (and up to 47% in one task) compared to the prevailing WS supervision approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-02T19:57:32Z)
• Fix your Models by Fixing your Datasets [0.6058427379240697]
  Current machine learning tools lack streamlined processes for improving the data quality. We introduce a systematic framework for finding noisy or mislabelled samples in the dataset. We demonstrate the efficacy of our framework on public as well as private enterprise datasets of two Fortune 500 companies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T02:41:50Z)
• Towards an Integrated Platform for Big Data Analysis [4.5257812998381315]
  This paper presents the vision of an integrated plat-form for big data analysis that combines all these aspects. Main benefits of this approach are an enhanced scalability of the whole platform, a better parameterization of algorithms, and an improved usability during the end-to-end data analysis process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-27T03:15:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.