CrowdCounter: A benchmark type-specific multi-target counterspeech dataset

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01400v1
• Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2024 10:24:51 GMT
• Title: CrowdCounter: A benchmark type-specific multi-target counterspeech dataset
• Authors: Punyajoy Saha, Abhilash Datta, Abhik Jana, Animesh Mukherjee,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a new dataset - CrowdCounter containing 3,425 hate speech-counterspeech pairs. The design of our annotation platform itself encourages annotators to write type-specific, non-redundant and high-quality counterspeech. We evaluate two frameworks for generating counterspeech responses - vanilla and type-controlled prompts.
• Score: 10.133642589954192
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Counterspeech presents a viable alternative to banning or suspending users for hate speech while upholding freedom of expression. However, writing effective counterspeech is challenging for moderators/users. Hence, developing suggestion tools for writing counterspeech is the need of the hour. One critical challenge in developing such a tool is the lack of quality and diversity of the responses in the existing datasets. Hence, we introduce a new dataset - CrowdCounter containing 3,425 hate speech-counterspeech pairs spanning six different counterspeech types (empathy, humor, questioning, warning, shaming, contradiction), which is the first of its kind. The design of our annotation platform itself encourages annotators to write type-specific, non-redundant and high-quality counterspeech. We evaluate two frameworks for generating counterspeech responses - vanilla and type-controlled prompts - across four large language models. In terms of metrics, we evaluate the responses using relevance, diversity and quality. We observe that Flan-T5 is the best model in the vanilla framework across different models. Type-specific prompts enhance the relevance of the responses, although they might reduce the language quality. DialoGPT proves to be the best at following the instructions and generating the type-specific counterspeech accurately.

Related papers

• VoiceTextBlender: Augmenting Large Language Models with Speech Capabilities via Single-Stage Joint Speech-Text Supervised Fine-Tuning [64.56272011710735]
  We propose a novel single-stage joint speech-text SFT approach on the low-rank adaptation (LoRA) of the large language models (LLMs) backbone. Compared to previous SpeechLMs with 7B or 13B parameters, our 3B model demonstrates superior performance across various speech benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T00:36:06Z)
• TransVIP: Speech to Speech Translation System with Voice and Isochrony Preservation [97.54885207518946]
  We introduce a novel model framework TransVIP that leverages diverse datasets in a cascade fashion. We propose two separated encoders to preserve the speaker's voice characteristics and isochrony from the source speech during the translation process. Our experiments on the French-English language pair demonstrate that our model outperforms the current state-of-the-art speech-to-speech translation model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T04:11:37Z)
• Intent-conditioned and Non-toxic Counterspeech Generation using Multi-Task Instruction Tuning with RLAIF [14.2594830589926]
  Counterspeech, defined as a response to online hate speech, is increasingly used as a non-censorial solution. Our study introduces CoARL, a novel framework enhancing counterspeech generation by modeling the pragmatic implications underlying social biases in hateful statements. CoARL's first two phases involve sequential multi-instruction tuning, teaching the model to understand intents, reactions, and harms of offensive statements, and then learning task-specific low-rank adapter weights for generating intent-conditioned counterspeech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T08:03:49Z)
• DisCGen: A Framework for Discourse-Informed Counterspeech Generation [34.75404551612012]
  We propose a framework based on theories of discourse to study the inferential links that connect counter speeches to hateful comments. We present a process for collecting an in-the-wild dataset of counterspeech from Reddit. We show that by using our dataset and framework, large language models can generate contextually-grounded counterspeech informed by theories of discourse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T23:20:17Z)
• SpeechTokenizer: Unified Speech Tokenizer for Speech Large Language Models [58.996653700982556]
  Existing speech tokens are not specifically designed for speech language modeling. We propose SpeechTokenizer, a unified speech tokenizer for speech large language models. Experiments show that SpeechTokenizer performs comparably to EnCodec in speech reconstruction and demonstrates strong performance on the SLMTokBench benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T12:53:09Z)
• SpeechGen: Unlocking the Generative Power of Speech Language Models with Prompts [108.04306136086807]
  We present research that explores the application of prompt tuning to stimulate speech LMs for various generation tasks, within a unified framework called SpeechGen. The proposed unified framework holds great promise for efficiency and effectiveness, particularly with the imminent arrival of advanced speech LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-03T22:35:27Z)
• Counterspeeches up my sleeve! Intent Distribution Learning and Persistent Fusion for Intent-Conditioned Counterspeech Generation [26.4510688070963]
  In this paper, we explore intent-conditioned counterspeech generation. We develop IntentCONAN, a diversified intent-specific counterspeech dataset with 6831 counterspeeches conditioned on five intents. We propose QUARC, a two-stage framework for intent-conditioned counterspeech generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T07:45:17Z)
• SpeechLM: Enhanced Speech Pre-Training with Unpaired Textual Data [100.46303484627045]
  We propose a cross-modal Speech and Language Model (SpeechLM) to align speech and text pre-training with a pre-defined unified representation. Specifically, we introduce two alternative discrete tokenizers to bridge the speech and text modalities. We evaluate SpeechLM on various spoken language processing tasks including speech recognition, speech translation, and universal representation evaluation framework SUPERB.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T09:12:10Z)
• CounterGeDi: A controllable approach to generate polite, detoxified and emotional counterspeech [7.300229659237878]
  We propose CounterGeDi to guide the generation of a DialoGPT model toward more polite, detoxified, and emotionally laden counterspeech. We generate counterspeech using three datasets and observe significant improvement across different attribute scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-09T14:10:57Z)
• Addressing the Challenges of Cross-Lingual Hate Speech Detection [115.1352779982269]
  In this paper we focus on cross-lingual transfer learning to support hate speech detection in low-resource languages. We leverage cross-lingual word embeddings to train our neural network systems on the source language and apply it to the target language. We investigate the issue of label imbalance of hate speech datasets, since the high ratio of non-hate examples compared to hate examples often leads to low model performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T20:48:14Z)
• Generate, Prune, Select: A Pipeline for Counterspeech Generation against Online Hate Speech [9.49544185939481]
  Off-the-shelf Natural Language Generation (NLG) methods are limited in that they generate commonplace, repetitive and safe responses. In this paper, we design a three- module pipeline approach to effectively improve the diversity and relevance. Our proposed pipeline first generates various counterspeech candidates by a generative model to promote diversity, then filters the ungrammatical ones using a BERT model, and finally selects the most relevant counterspeech response.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T06:54:03Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.