Public interest in science or bots? Selective amplification of scientific articles on Twitter
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.01842v1
- Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2024 07:48:44 GMT
- Title: Public interest in science or bots? Selective amplification of scientific articles on Twitter
- Abstract summary: We used the Altmetric dataset in combination with data collected through the Twitter API and the Botometer API.
We analyzed the data to see the possibility of bot activity based on different characteristics of the article.
We trained machine-learning models using this dataset to identify possible bot activity in any given article.
- Score: 1.1606619391009658
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: With the remarkable capability to reach the public instantly, social media has become integral in sharing scholarly articles to measure public response. Since spamming by bots on social media can steer the conversation and present a false public interest in given research, affecting policies impacting the public's lives in the real world, this topic warrants critical study and attention. We used the Altmetric dataset in combination with data collected through the Twitter Application Programming Interface (API) and the Botometer API. We combined the data into an extensive dataset with academic articles, several features from the article and a label indicating whether the article had excessive bot activity on Twitter or not. We analyzed the data to see the possibility of bot activity based on different characteristics of the article. We also trained machine-learning models using this dataset to identify possible bot activity in any given article. Our machine-learning models were capable of identifying possible bot activity in any academic article with an accuracy of 0.70. We also found that articles related to "Health and Human Science" are more prone to bot activity compared to other research areas. Without arguing the maliciousness of the bot activity, our work presents a tool to identify the presence of bot activity in the dissemination of an academic article and creates a baseline for future research in this direction.
Related papers
- FATe of Bots: Ethical Considerations of Social Bot Detection [1.8470340645800405]
We examine the ethical implications for social bot detection systems through three pillars: training datasets, algorithm development, and the use of bot agents.<n>We aim to inspire more responsible and equitable approaches towards improving the social media bot detection landscape.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-05T01:53:17Z) - RoBCtrl: Attacking GNN-Based Social Bot Detectors via Reinforced Manipulation of Bots Control Interaction [51.46634975923564]
This paper proposes the first adversarial multi-agent Reinforcement learning framework for social Bot control attacks (RoBCtrl)<n> Specifically, we use a diffusion model to generate high-fidelity bot accounts by reconstructing existing account data with minor modifications.<n>We then employ a Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) method to simulate bots adversarial behavior.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-16T02:41:49Z) - Exploring social bots: A feature-based approach to improve bot detection in social networks [1.5186937600119894]
The importance of social media in our daily lives has led to an increase in the spread of misinformation, political messages and malicious links.
One of the most popular ways of carrying out those activities is using automated accounts, also known as bots, which makes the detection of such accounts a necessity.
This paper addresses that problem by investigating features based on the user account profile and its content, aiming to understand the relevance of each feature as a basis for improving future bot detectors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-10T23:19:08Z) - Adversarial Botometer: Adversarial Analysis for Social Bot Detection [1.9280536006736573]
Social bots produce content that mimics human creativity.
Malicious social bots emerge to deceive people with their unrealistic content.
We evaluate the behavior of a text-based bot detector in a competitive environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-03T11:28:21Z) - Unsupervised Sentiment Analysis of Plastic Surgery Social Media Posts [91.3755431537592]
The massive collection of user posts across social media platforms is primarily untapped for artificial intelligence (AI) use cases.
Natural language processing (NLP) is a subfield of AI that leverages bodies of documents, known as corpora, to train computers in human-like language understanding.
This study demonstrates that the applied results of unsupervised analysis allow a computer to predict either negative, positive, or neutral user sentiment towards plastic surgery.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-05T20:16:20Z) - BotArtist: Generic approach for bot detection in Twitter via semi-automatic machine learning pipeline [47.61306219245444]
Twitter has become a target for bots and fake accounts, resulting in the spread of false information and manipulation.
This paper introduces a semi-automatic machine learning pipeline (SAMLP) designed to address the challenges correlated with machine learning model development.
We develop a comprehensive bot detection model named BotArtist, based on user profile features.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-31T09:12:35Z) - ManiTweet: A New Benchmark for Identifying Manipulation of News on Social Media [74.93847489218008]
We present a novel task, identifying manipulation of news on social media, which aims to detect manipulation in social media posts and identify manipulated or inserted information.
To study this task, we have proposed a data collection schema and curated a dataset called ManiTweet, consisting of 3.6K pairs of tweets and corresponding articles.
Our analysis demonstrates that this task is highly challenging, with large language models (LLMs) yielding unsatisfactory performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T16:40:07Z) - Machine Learning-based Automatic Annotation and Detection of COVID-19
Fake News [8.020736472947581]
COVID-19 impacted every part of the world, although the misinformation about the outbreak traveled faster than the virus.
Existing work neglects the presence of bots that act as a catalyst in the spread.
We propose an automated approach for labeling data using verified fact-checked statements on a Twitter dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-07T13:55:59Z) - Investigating the Validity of Botometer-based Social Bot Studies [0.0]
Social bots are assumed to be automated social media accounts operated by malicious actors with the goal of manipulating public opinion.
Social bot activity has been reported in many different political contexts, including the U.S. presidential elections.
We point out a fundamental theoretical flaw in the widely-used study design for estimating the prevalence of social bots.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-23T09:31:30Z) - Identification of Twitter Bots based on an Explainable ML Framework: the
US 2020 Elections Case Study [72.61531092316092]
This paper focuses on the design of a novel system for identifying Twitter bots based on labeled Twitter data.
Supervised machine learning (ML) framework is adopted using an Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm.
Our study also deploys Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) for explaining the ML model predictions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-08T14:12:24Z) - Human-in-the-Loop Disinformation Detection: Stance, Sentiment, or
Something Else? [93.91375268580806]
Both politics and pandemics have recently provided ample motivation for the development of machine learning-enabled disinformation (a.k.a. fake news) detection algorithms.
Existing literature has focused primarily on the fully-automated case, but the resulting techniques cannot reliably detect disinformation on the varied topics, sources, and time scales required for military applications.
By leveraging an already-available analyst as a human-in-the-loop, canonical machine learning techniques of sentiment analysis, aspect-based sentiment analysis, and stance detection become plausible methods to use for a partially-automated disinformation detection system.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-09T13:30:34Z) - Detection of Novel Social Bots by Ensembles of Specialized Classifiers [60.63582690037839]
Malicious actors create inauthentic social media accounts controlled in part by algorithms, known as social bots, to disseminate misinformation and agitate online discussion.
We show that different types of bots are characterized by different behavioral features.
We propose a new supervised learning method that trains classifiers specialized for each class of bots and combines their decisions through the maximum rule.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-11T22:59:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.