Dual Active Learning for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.02504v1
• Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 14:09:58 GMT
• Title: Dual Active Learning for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
• Authors: Pangpang Liu, Chengchun Shi, Will Wei Sun,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is widely applied to align large language models with human preferences. Human feedback is costly and time-consuming, making it essential to collect high-quality conversation data for human teachers to label. In this paper, we use offline reinforcement learning (RL) to formulate the alignment problem.
• Score: 13.732678966515781
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences is critical to recent advances in generative artificial intelligence. Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is widely applied to achieve this objective. A key step in RLHF is to learn the reward function from human feedback. However, human feedback is costly and time-consuming, making it essential to collect high-quality conversation data for human teachers to label. Additionally, different human teachers have different levels of expertise. It is thus critical to query the most appropriate teacher for their opinions. In this paper, we use offline reinforcement learning (RL) to formulate the alignment problem. Motivated by the idea of $D$-optimal design, we first propose a dual active reward learning algorithm for the simultaneous selection of conversations and teachers. Next, we apply pessimistic RL to solve the alignment problem, based on the learned reward estimator. Theoretically, we show that the reward estimator obtained through our proposed adaptive selection strategy achieves minimal generalized variance asymptotically, and prove that the sub-optimality of our pessimistic policy scales as $O(1/\sqrt{T})$ with a given sample budget $T$. Through simulations and experiments on LLMs, we demonstrate the effectiveness of our algorithm and its superiority over state-of-the-arts.

Related papers

• Iterative Nash Policy Optimization: Aligning LLMs with General Preferences via No-Regret Learning [55.65738319966385]
  We propose a novel online algorithm, iterative Nash policy optimization (INPO) Unlike previous methods, INPO bypasses the need for estimating the expected win rate for individual responses. With an LLaMA-3-8B-based SFT model, INPO achieves a 42.6% length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0 and a 37.8% win rate on Arena-Hard.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-30T08:00:34Z)
• ARES: Alternating Reinforcement Learning and Supervised Fine-Tuning for Enhanced Multi-Modal Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Through Diverse AI Feedback [13.154512864498912]
  We propose a two-stage algorithm ARES that Alternates REinforcement Learning (RL) and Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) First, we request the Teacher to score how much each sentence contributes to solving the problem in a Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Second, we ask the Teacher to correct the wrong reasoning after the RL stage. With the correction feedback, we stabilize the RL fine-tuned model through SFT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T07:20:11Z)
• Getting More Juice Out of the SFT Data: Reward Learning from Human Demonstration Improves SFT for LLM Alignment [65.15914284008973]
  We propose to leverage an Inverse Reinforcement Learning (IRL) technique to simultaneously build an reward model and a policy model. We show that the proposed algorithms converge to the stationary solutions of the IRL problem. Our results indicate that it is beneficial to leverage reward learning throughout the entire alignment process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T07:11:05Z)
• Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning from Preference Human Feedback [41.327438095745315]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has become the standard approach for aligning Large Language Models with human preferences. Existing methods work by emulating the preferences at the single decision (turn) level. We develop novel methods for Reinforcement Learning from preference feedback between two full multi-turn conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T14:53:54Z)
• Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Active Queries [67.27150911254155]
  Current reinforcement learning approaches often require a large amount of human-labelled preference data. We propose query-efficient RLHF methods, inspired by the success of active learning. Our experiments show that ADPO, while only making about half of queries for human preference, matches the performance of the state-of-the-art DPO method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:58:40Z)
• REBEL: A Regularization-Based Solution for Reward Overoptimization in Robotic Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [61.54791065013767]
  A misalignment between the reward function and user intentions, values, or social norms can be catastrophic in the real world. Current methods to mitigate this misalignment work by learning reward functions from human preferences. We propose a novel concept of reward regularization within the robotic RLHF framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T04:56:37Z)
• Contrastive Preference Learning: Learning from Human Feedback without RL [71.77024922527642]
  We introduce Contrastive Preference Learning (CPL), an algorithm for learning optimal policies from preferences without learning reward functions. CPL is fully off-policy, uses only a simple contrastive objective, and can be applied to arbitrary MDPs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-20T16:37:56Z)
• Active Reward Learning from Multiple Teachers [17.10187575303075]
  Reward learning algorithms utilize human feedback to infer a reward function, which is then used to train an AI system. This human feedback is often a preference comparison, in which the human teacher compares several samples of AI behavior and chooses which they believe best accomplishes the objective. While reward learning typically assumes that all feedback comes from a single teacher, in practice these systems often query multiple teachers to gather sufficient training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-02T01:26:53Z)
• Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning [88.34958680436552]
  We present an exploration method specifically for preference-based reinforcement learning algorithms. Our main idea is to design an intrinsic reward by measuring the novelty based on learned reward. Our experiments show that exploration bonus from uncertainty in learned reward improves both feedback- and sample-efficiency of preference-based RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T23:22:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.