A Survey on Group Fairness in Federated Learning: Challenges, Taxonomy of Solutions and Directions for Future Research

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03855v2
• Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 15:31:36 GMT
• Title: A Survey on Group Fairness in Federated Learning: Challenges, Taxonomy of Solutions and Directions for Future Research
• Authors: Teresa Salazar, Helder Araújo, Alberto Cano, Pedro Henriques Abreu,
• Abstract summary: Group fairness in machine learning is an important area of research focused on achieving equitable outcomes across different groups.<n> Federated Learning amplifies the need for fairness methodologies due to its inherent heterogeneous data distributions.<n>No comprehensive survey has specifically focused on group fairness in Federated Learning.
• Score: 3.521369597288705
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Group fairness in machine learning is an important area of research focused on achieving equitable outcomes across different groups defined by sensitive attributes such as race or gender. Federated Learning, a decentralized approach to training machine learning models across multiple clients, amplifies the need for fairness methodologies due to its inherent heterogeneous data distributions that can exacerbate biases. The intersection of Federated Learning and group fairness has attracted significant interest, with 48 research works specifically dedicated to addressing this issue. However, no comprehensive survey has specifically focused on group fairness in Federated Learning. In this work, we analyze the key challenges of this topic, propose practices for its identification and benchmarking, and create a novel taxonomy based on criteria such as data partitioning, location, and strategy. Furthermore, we analyze broader concerns, review how different approaches handle the complexities of various sensitive attributes, examine common datasets and applications, and discuss the ethical, legal, and policy implications of group fairness in FL. We conclude by highlighting key areas for future research, emphasizing the need for more methods to address the complexities of achieving group fairness in federated systems.

Related papers

• Trade-offs Between Individual and Group Fairness in Machine Learning: A Comprehensive Review [0.0]
  Group Fairness (GF) focuses on mitigating disparities across demographic subpopulations, and Individual Fairness (IF) emphasizes consistent treatment of similar individuals.<n>This survey examines methods that jointly address GF and IF, integrating both perspectives within unified frameworks.<n>We provide a systematic and critical review of hybrid fairness approaches, organizing existing methods according to the fairness mechanisms they employ and the algorithmic and mathematical strategies used to reconcile multiple fairness criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T19:25:38Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey on Imbalanced Data Learning [45.3186824501823]
  imbalanced data is prevalent in various types of raw data and hinders the performance of machine learning. This survey systematically analyzes various real-world data formats. It concludes existing researches for different data formats into four categories: data re-balancing, feature representation, training strategy, and ensemble learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T04:53:17Z)
• Fair Clustering: Critique, Caveats, and Future Directions [11.077625489695922]
  Clustering is a fundamental problem in machine learning and operations research. We take a critical view of fair clustering, identifying a collection of ignored issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T23:34:53Z)
• Quantifying the Cross-sectoral Intersecting Discrepancies within Multiple Groups Using Latent Class Analysis Towards Fairness [6.683051393349788]
  This research introduces an innovative approach to quantify cross-sectoral intersecting discrepancies. We validate our approach using both proprietary and public datasets. Our findings reveal significant discrepancies between minority ethnic groups, highlighting the need for targeted interventions in real-world AI applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T08:10:31Z)
• Advances in Robust Federated Learning: Heterogeneity Considerations [25.261572089655264]
  Key challenge is to efficiently train models across multiple clients with different data distributions, model structures, task objectives, computational capabilities, and communication resources. In this paper, we first outline the basic concepts of heterogeneous federated learning. We then summarize the research challenges in federated learning in terms of five aspects: data, model, task, device, and communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T06:35:42Z)
• Distribution-Free Fair Federated Learning with Small Samples [54.63321245634712]
  FedFaiREE is a post-processing algorithm developed specifically for distribution-free fair learning in decentralized settings with small samples. We provide rigorous theoretical guarantees for both fairness and accuracy, and our experimental results further provide robust empirical validation for our proposed method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T17:37:53Z)
• Supervised Algorithmic Fairness in Distribution Shifts: A Survey [17.826312801085052]
  In real-world applications, machine learning models are often trained on a specific dataset but deployed in environments where the data distribution may shift. This shift can lead to unfair predictions, disproportionately affecting certain groups characterized by sensitive attributes, such as race and gender.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T11:26:18Z)
• Federated Learning for Generalization, Robustness, Fairness: A Survey and Benchmark [55.898771405172155]
  Federated learning has emerged as a promising paradigm for privacy-preserving collaboration among different parties. We provide a systematic overview of the important and recent developments of research on federated learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T06:32:30Z)
• Exploring Federated Unlearning: Review, Comparison, and Insights [101.64910079905566]
  federated unlearning enables the selective removal of data from models trained in federated systems.<n>This paper examines existing federated unlearning approaches, examining their algorithmic efficiency, impact on model accuracy, and effectiveness in preserving privacy.<n>We propose the OpenFederatedUnlearning framework, a unified benchmark for evaluating federated unlearning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-30T01:34:33Z)
• Fairness meets Cross-Domain Learning: a new perspective on Models and Metrics [80.07271410743806]
  We study the relationship between cross-domain learning (CD) and model fairness. We introduce a benchmark on face and medical images spanning several demographic groups as well as classification and localization tasks. Our study covers 14 CD approaches alongside three state-of-the-art fairness algorithms and shows how the former can outperform the latter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-25T09:34:05Z)
• Deep Clustering: A Comprehensive Survey [53.387957674512585]
  Clustering analysis plays an indispensable role in machine learning and data mining. Deep clustering, which can learn clustering-friendly representations using deep neural networks, has been broadly applied in a wide range of clustering tasks. Existing surveys for deep clustering mainly focus on the single-view fields and the network architectures, ignoring the complex application scenarios of clustering.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-09T02:31:32Z)
• FairFed: Enabling Group Fairness in Federated Learning [22.913999279079878]
  Federated learning has been viewed as a promising solution for learning machine learning models among multiple parties. We propose FairFed, a novel algorithm to enhance group fairness via a fairness-aware aggregation method. Our proposed method outperforms the state-of-the-art fair federated learning frameworks under a high heterogeneous sensitive attribute distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-02T17:55:20Z)
• MultiFair: Multi-Group Fairness in Machine Learning [52.24956510371455]
  We study multi-group fairness in machine learning (MultiFair) We propose a generic end-to-end algorithmic framework to solve it. Our proposed framework is generalizable to many different settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T02:30:22Z)
• Through the Data Management Lens: Experimental Analysis and Evaluation of Fair Classification [75.49600684537117]
  Data management research is showing an increasing presence and interest in topics related to data and algorithmic fairness. We contribute a broad analysis of 13 fair classification approaches and additional variants, over their correctness, fairness, efficiency, scalability, and stability. Our analysis highlights novel insights on the impact of different metrics and high-level approach characteristics on different aspects of performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-18T22:55:40Z)
• Heterogeneous Representation Learning: A Review [66.12816399765296]
  Heterogeneous Representation Learning (HRL) brings some unique challenges. We present a unified learning framework which is able to model most existing learning settings with the heterogeneous inputs. We highlight the challenges that are less-touched in HRL and present future research directions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-28T05:12:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.