Adaptation Odyssey in LLMs: Why Does Additional Pretraining Sometimes Fail to Improve?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.05581v2
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 07:07:20 GMT
• Title: Adaptation Odyssey in LLMs: Why Does Additional Pretraining Sometimes Fail to Improve?
• Authors: Fırat Öncel, Matthias Bethge, Beyza Ermis, Mirco Ravanelli, Cem Subakan, Çağatay Yıldız,
• Abstract summary: We show that training a model on a text domain could degrade its perplexity on the test portion of the same domain. Our findings will guide us in determining when to adapt a model vs when to rely on its foundational capabilities.
• Score: 19.34040322172224
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In the last decade, the generalization and adaptation abilities of deep learning models were typically evaluated on fixed training and test distributions. Contrary to traditional deep learning, large language models (LLMs) are (i) even more overparameterized, (ii) trained on unlabeled text corpora curated from the Internet with minimal human intervention, and (iii) trained in an online fashion. These stark contrasts prevent researchers from transferring lessons learned on model generalization and adaptation in deep learning contexts to LLMs. To this end, our short paper introduces empirical observations that aim to shed light on further training of already pretrained language models. Specifically, we demonstrate that training a model on a text domain could degrade its perplexity on the test portion of the same domain. We observe with our subsequent analysis that the performance degradation is positively correlated with the similarity between the additional and the original pretraining dataset of the LLM. Our further token-level perplexity observations reveals that the perplexity degradation is due to a handful of tokens that are not informative about the domain. We hope these findings will guide us in determining when to adapt a model vs when to rely on its foundational capabilities.

Related papers

• What Do Learning Dynamics Reveal About Generalization in LLM Reasoning? [83.83230167222852]
  We find that a model's generalization behavior can be effectively characterized by a training metric we call pre-memorization train accuracy. By connecting a model's learning behavior to its generalization, pre-memorization train accuracy can guide targeted improvements to training strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T09:52:40Z)
• Accelerating Large Language Model Pretraining via LFR Pedagogy: Learn, Focus, and Review [50.78587571704713]
  Large Language Model (LLM) pretraining traditionally relies on autoregressive language modeling on randomly sampled data blocks from web-scale datasets. We take inspiration from human learning techniques like spaced repetition to hypothesize that random data sampling for LLMs leads to high training cost and low quality models which tend to forget data. In order to effectively commit web-scale information to long-term memory, we propose the LFR (Learn, Focus, and Review) pedagogy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T00:59:18Z)
• Dwell in the Beginning: How Language Models Embed Long Documents for Dense Retrieval [31.9252824152673]
  We build on previous research that demonstrated loss of information in the middle of input sequences for causal language models. We examine positional biases at various stages of training for an encoder-decoder model, including language model pre-training, contrastive pre-training, and contrastive fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T15:16:16Z)
• The Fine Line: Navigating Large Language Model Pretraining with Down-streaming Capability Analysis [27.310894780313618]
  This paper undertakes a comprehensive comparison of model capabilities at various pretraining intermediate checkpoints. We confirm that specific downstream metrics exhibit similar training dynamics across models of different sizes. In addition to our core findings, we've reproduced Amber and OpenLLaMA, releasing their intermediate checkpoints.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:00:01Z)
• What do Large Language Models Learn beyond Language? [10.9650651784511]
  We find that pretrained models significantly outperform comparable non-pretrained neural models. Experiments surprisingly reveal that the positive effects of pre-training persist even when pretraining on multi-lingual text or computer code. Our findings suggest a hitherto unexplored deep connection between pre-training and inductive learning abilities of language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-21T23:43:13Z)
• Better Language Model with Hypernym Class Prediction [101.8517004687825]
  Class-based language models (LMs) have been long devised to address context sparsity in $n$-gram LMs. In this study, we revisit this approach in the context of neural LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-21T01:16:44Z)
• Explain, Edit, and Understand: Rethinking User Study Design for Evaluating Model Explanations [97.91630330328815]
  We conduct a crowdsourcing study, where participants interact with deception detection models that have been trained to distinguish between genuine and fake hotel reviews. We observe that for a linear bag-of-words model, participants with access to the feature coefficients during training are able to cause a larger reduction in model confidence in the testing phase when compared to the no-explanation control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-17T18:29:56Z)
• An Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inference [117.19809377740188]
  We study the role of the pretraining distribution on the emergence of in-context learning. We prove that in-context learning occurs implicitly via Bayesian inference of the latent concept. We empirically find that scaling model size improves in-context accuracy even when the pretraining loss is the same.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-03T09:12:33Z)
• Lifelong Pretraining: Continually Adapting Language Models to Emerging Corpora [31.136334214818305]
  We study a lifelong language model pretraining challenge where a PTLM is continually updated so as to adapt to emerging data. Over a domain-incremental research paper stream and a chronologically ordered tweet stream, we incrementally pretrain a PTLM with different continual learning algorithms. Our experiments show continual learning algorithms improve knowledge preservation, with logit distillation being the most effective approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-16T09:59:33Z)
• Training Dynamics for Text Summarization Models [45.62439188988816]
  We analyze the training dynamics for generation models, focusing on news summarization. Across different datasets (CNN/DM, XSum, MediaSum) and summary properties, we study what the model learns at different stages of its fine-tuning process. We find that properties such as copy behavior are learnt earlier in the training process and these observations are robust across domains. On the other hand, factual errors, such as hallucination of unsupported facts, are learnt in the later stages, and this behavior is more varied across domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T21:13:41Z)
• On the Transferability of Pre-trained Language Models: A Study from Artificial Datasets [74.11825654535895]
  Pre-training language models (LMs) on large-scale unlabeled text data makes the model much easier to achieve exceptional downstream performance. We study what specific traits in the pre-training data, other than the semantics, make a pre-trained LM superior to their counterparts trained from scratch on downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-08T10:39:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.