Hallucinating AI Hijacking Attack: Large Language Models and Malicious Code Recommenders

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06462v1
• Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 01:36:25 GMT
• Title: Hallucinating AI Hijacking Attack: Large Language Models and Malicious Code Recommenders
• Authors: David Noever, Forrest McKee,
• Abstract summary: Research builds and evaluates the adversarial potential to introduce copied code or hallucinated AI recommendations for malicious code in popular code repositories. foundational large language models (LLMs) from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic guard against both harmful behaviors and toxic strings. We compare this attack to previous work on context-shifting and contrast the attack surface as a novel version of "living off the land" attacks in the malware literature.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The research builds and evaluates the adversarial potential to introduce copied code or hallucinated AI recommendations for malicious code in popular code repositories. While foundational large language models (LLMs) from OpenAI, Google, and Anthropic guard against both harmful behaviors and toxic strings, previous work on math solutions that embed harmful prompts demonstrate that the guardrails may differ between expert contexts. These loopholes would appear in mixture of expert's models when the context of the question changes and may offer fewer malicious training examples to filter toxic comments or recommended offensive actions. The present work demonstrates that foundational models may refuse to propose destructive actions correctly when prompted overtly but may unfortunately drop their guard when presented with a sudden change of context, like solving a computer programming challenge. We show empirical examples with trojan-hosting repositories like GitHub, NPM, NuGet, and popular content delivery networks (CDN) like jsDelivr which amplify the attack surface. In the LLM's directives to be helpful, example recommendations propose application programming interface (API) endpoints which a determined domain-squatter could acquire and setup attack mobile infrastructure that triggers from the naively copied code. We compare this attack to previous work on context-shifting and contrast the attack surface as a novel version of "living off the land" attacks in the malware literature. In the latter case, foundational language models can hijack otherwise innocent user prompts to recommend actions that violate their owners' safety policies when posed directly without the accompanying coding support request.

Related papers

• Generalized Adversarial Code-Suggestions: Exploiting Contexts of LLM-based Code-Completion [4.940253381814369]
  adversarial code-suggestions can be introduced via data poisoning and, thus, unknowingly by the model creators. In this paper, we provide a generalized formulation of such attacks, spawning and extending related work in this domain. The latter gives rise to novel and more flexible targeted attack-strategies, allowing the adversary to choose the most suitable trigger pattern for a specific user-group arbitrarily.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T14:06:05Z)
• BaThe: Defense against the Jailbreak Attack in Multimodal Large Language Models by Treating Harmful Instruction as Backdoor Trigger [47.1955210785169]
  In this work, we propose $textbfBaThe, a simple yet effective jailbreak defense mechanism. Jailbreak backdoor attack uses harmful instructions combined with manually crafted strings as triggers to make the backdoored model generate prohibited responses. We assume that harmful instructions can function as triggers, and if we alternatively set rejection responses as the triggered response, the backdoored model then can defend against jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-17T04:43:26Z)
• Human-Interpretable Adversarial Prompt Attack on Large Language Models with Situational Context [49.13497493053742]
  This research explores converting a nonsensical suffix attack into a sensible prompt via a situation-driven contextual re-writing. We combine an independent, meaningful adversarial insertion and situations derived from movies to check if this can trick an LLM. Our approach demonstrates that a successful situation-driven attack can be executed on both open-source and proprietary LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T19:47:26Z)
• Assessing Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities in Code Large Language Models [18.720986922660543]
  EvilInstructCoder is a framework designed to assess the cybersecurity vulnerabilities of instruction-tuned Code LLMs to adversarial attacks. It incorporates practical threat models to reflect real-world adversaries with varying capabilities. We conduct a comprehensive investigation into the exploitability of instruction tuning for coding tasks using three state-of-the-art Code LLM models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T10:14:58Z)
• Query-Based Adversarial Prompt Generation [67.238873588125]
  We build adversarial examples that cause an aligned language model to emit harmful strings. We validate our attack on GPT-3.5 and OpenAI's safety classifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T18:01:36Z)
• AutoDAN: Interpretable Gradient-Based Adversarial Attacks on Large Language Models [55.748851471119906]
  Safety alignment of Large Language Models (LLMs) can be compromised with manual jailbreak attacks and (automatic) adversarial attacks. Recent studies suggest that defending against these attacks is possible: adversarial attacks generate unlimited but unreadable gibberish prompts, detectable by perplexity-based filters. We introduce AutoDAN, an interpretable, gradient-based adversarial attack that merges the strengths of both attack types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-23T17:46:07Z)
• Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Models [102.63973600144308]
  Open-source large language models can be easily subverted to generate harmful content. Experiments across 8 models released by 5 different organizations demonstrate the effectiveness of shadow alignment attack. This study serves as a clarion call for a collective effort to overhaul and fortify the safety of open-source LLMs against malicious attackers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T16:39:31Z)
• Backdooring Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Virtual Prompt Injection [66.94175259287115]
  We propose a novel backdoor attack setting tailored for instruction-tuned LLMs. In a VPI attack, a backdoored model is expected to respond as if an attacker-specified virtual prompt were formalized to the user instruction. We demonstrate the threat by poisoning the model's instruction tuning data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-31T17:56:00Z)
• Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models [118.41733208825278]
  We propose a simple and effective attack method that causes aligned language models to generate objectionable behaviors. Surprisingly, we find that the adversarial prompts generated by our approach are quite transferable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-27T17:49:12Z)
• MSDT: Masked Language Model Scoring Defense in Text Domain [16.182765935007254]
  We will introduce a novel improved textual backdoor defense method, named MSDT, that outperforms the current existing defensive algorithms in specific datasets. experimental results illustrate that our method can be effective and constructive in terms of defending against backdoor attack in text domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-10T06:46:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.