Calibrating Verbalized Probabilities for Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.06707v1
• Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 09:20:24 GMT
• Title: Calibrating Verbalized Probabilities for Large Language Models
• Authors: Cheng Wang, Gyuri Szarvas, Georges Balazs, Pavel Danchenko, Patrick Ernst,
• Abstract summary: Calibrating verbalized probabilities presents a novel approach for reliably assessing and leveraging outputs from black-box Large Language Models. Recent methods have demonstrated improved calibration by applying techniques like Platt scaling or temperature scaling to the confidence scores generated by LLMs.
• Score: 7.586709509332433
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Calibrating verbalized probabilities presents a novel approach for reliably assessing and leveraging outputs from black-box Large Language Models (LLMs). Recent methods have demonstrated improved calibration by applying techniques like Platt scaling or temperature scaling to the confidence scores generated by LLMs. In this paper, we explore the calibration of verbalized probability distributions for discriminative tasks. First, we investigate the capability of LLMs to generate probability distributions over categorical labels. We theoretically and empirically identify the issue of re-softmax arising from the scaling of verbalized probabilities, and propose using the invert softmax trick to approximate the "logit" by inverting verbalized probabilities. Through extensive evaluation on three public datasets, we demonstrate: (1) the robust capability of LLMs in generating class distributions, and (2) the effectiveness of the invert softmax trick in estimating logits, which, in turn, facilitates post-calibration adjustments.

Related papers

• CalibraEval: Calibrating Prediction Distribution to Mitigate Selection Bias in LLMs-as-Judges [21.580762639442913]
  We introduce CalibraEval, a novel label-free method for mitigating selection bias during inference. CalibraEval reformulates debiasing as an optimization task aimed at adjusting observed prediction distributions to align with unbiased prediction distributions. We show that CalibraEval effectively mitigates selection bias and improves performance compared to existing debiasing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T13:47:39Z)
• Pretraining Data Detection for Large Language Models: A Divergence-based Calibration Method [108.56493934296687]
  We introduce a divergence-based calibration method, inspired by the divergence-from-randomness concept, to calibrate token probabilities for pretraining data detection. We have developed a Chinese-language benchmark, PatentMIA, to assess the performance of detection approaches for LLMs on Chinese text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-23T07:55:35Z)
• Calibrated Large Language Models for Binary Question Answering [49.1574468325115]
  A well-calibrated model should produce probabilities that accurately reflect the likelihood of its predictions being correct. We propose a novel approach that utilizes the inductive Venn--Abers predictor (IVAP) to calibrate the probabilities associated with the output tokens corresponding to the binary labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T09:31:03Z)
• Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations [53.15438489398938]
  Large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, but their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. We propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T16:35:30Z)
• Calibrating Large Language Models with Sample Consistency [76.23956851098598]
  We explore the potential of deriving confidence from the distribution of multiple randomly sampled model generations, via three measures of consistency. Results show that consistency-based calibration methods outperform existing post-hoc approaches. We offer practical guidance on choosing suitable consistency metrics for calibration, tailored to the characteristics of various LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T16:15:20Z)
• Dirichlet-Based Prediction Calibration for Learning with Noisy Labels [40.78497779769083]
  Learning with noisy labels can significantly hinder the generalization performance of deep neural networks (DNNs) Existing approaches address this issue through loss correction or example selection methods. We propose the textitDirichlet-based Prediction (DPC) method as a solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T12:33:04Z)
• Self-Evaluation Improves Selective Generation in Large Language Models [54.003992911447696]
  We reformulate open-ended generation tasks into token-level prediction tasks. We instruct an LLM to self-evaluate its answers. We benchmark a range of scoring methods based on self-evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-14T19:09:22Z)
• Variational Classification [51.2541371924591]
  We derive a variational objective to train the model, analogous to the evidence lower bound (ELBO) used to train variational auto-encoders. Treating inputs to the softmax layer as samples of a latent variable, our abstracted perspective reveals a potential inconsistency. We induce a chosen latent distribution, instead of the implicit assumption found in a standard softmax layer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T17:47:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.