Automated and Complete Generation of Traffic Scenarios at Road Junctions Using a Multi-level Danger Definition

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07079v1
• Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 17:23:51 GMT
• Title: Automated and Complete Generation of Traffic Scenarios at Road Junctions Using a Multi-level Danger Definition
• Authors: Aren A. Babikian, Attila Ficsor, Oszkár Semeráth, Gunter Mussbacher, Dániel Varró,
• Abstract summary: We propose an approach to derive a complete set of (potentially dangerous) abstract scenarios at any given road junction. From these abstract scenarios, we derive exact paths that actors must follow to guide simulation-based testing. Results show that the AV-under-test is involved in increasing percentages of unsafe behaviors in simulation.
• Score: 2.5608506499175094
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: To ensure their safe use, autonomous vehicles (AVs) must meet rigorous certification criteria that involve executing maneuvers safely within (arbitrary) scenarios where other actors perform their intended maneuvers. For that purpose, existing scenario generation approaches optimize search to derive scenarios with high probability of dangerous situations. In this paper, we hypothesise that at road junctions, potential danger predominantly arises from overlapping paths of individual actors carrying out their designated high-level maneuvers. As a step towards AV certification, we propose an approach to derive a complete set of (potentially dangerous) abstract scenarios at any given road junction, i.e. all permutations of overlapping abstract paths assigned to actors (including the AV) for a given set of possible abstract paths. From these abstract scenarios, we derive exact paths that actors must follow to guide simulation-based testing towards potential collisions. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate the behavior of a state-of-the-art learning based AV controller on scenarios generated over two realistic road junctions with increasing number of external actors. Results show that the AV-under-test is involved in increasing percentages of unsafe behaviors in simulation, which vary according to functional- and logical-level scenario properties.

Related papers

• AdvDiffuser: Generating Adversarial Safety-Critical Driving Scenarios via Guided Diffusion [6.909801263560482]
  AdvDiffuser is an adversarial framework for generating safety-critical driving scenarios through guided diffusion. We show that AdvDiffuser can be applied to various tested systems with minimal warm-up episode data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T02:03:21Z)
• A novel framework for adaptive stress testing of autonomous vehicles in highways [3.2112502548606825]
  We propose a novel framework to explore corner cases that can result in safety concerns in a highway traffic scenario. We develop a new reward function for DRL to guide the AST in identifying crash scenarios based on the collision probability estimate. The proposed framework is further integrated with a new driving model enabling us to create more realistic traffic scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T04:02:40Z)
• SAFE-SIM: Safety-Critical Closed-Loop Traffic Simulation with Diffusion-Controllable Adversaries [94.84458417662407]
  We introduce SAFE-SIM, a controllable closed-loop safety-critical simulation framework. Our approach yields two distinct advantages: 1) generating realistic long-tail safety-critical scenarios that closely reflect real-world conditions, and 2) providing controllable adversarial behavior for more comprehensive and interactive evaluations. We validate our framework empirically using the nuScenes and nuPlan datasets across multiple planners, demonstrating improvements in both realism and controllability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-31T04:14:43Z)
• Safeguarded Progress in Reinforcement Learning: Safe Bayesian Exploration for Control Policy Synthesis [63.532413807686524]
  This paper addresses the problem of maintaining safety during training in Reinforcement Learning (RL) We propose a new architecture that handles the trade-off between efficient progress and safety during exploration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T16:09:43Z)
• CAT: Closed-loop Adversarial Training for Safe End-to-End Driving [54.60865656161679]
  Adversarial Training (CAT) is a framework for safe end-to-end driving in autonomous vehicles. Cat aims to continuously improve the safety of driving agents by training the agent on safety-critical scenarios. Cat can effectively generate adversarial scenarios countering the agent being trained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T02:49:31Z)
• Continual Driving Policy Optimization with Closed-Loop Individualized Curricula [2.903150959383393]
  We develop a continuous driving policy optimization framework featuring Closed-Loop Individualized Curricula (CLIC) CLIC frames AV Evaluation as a collision prediction task, where it estimates the chance of AV failures in these scenarios at each iteration. We show that CLIC surpasses other curriculum-based training strategies, showing substantial improvement in managing risky scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T15:14:54Z)
• Toward Unsupervised Test Scenario Extraction for Automated Driving Systems from Urban Naturalistic Road Traffic Data [0.0]
  The presented method deploys an unsupervised machine learning pipeline to extract scenarios from road traffic data. It is evaluated for naturalistic road traffic data at urban intersections from the inD and the Silicon Valley Intersections datasets. Using hierarchical clustering the results show both a jump in overall accuracy of around 20% when moving from 4 to 5 clusters and a saturation effect starting at 41 clusters with an overall accuracy of 84%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-14T10:55:14Z)
• Generating and Characterizing Scenarios for Safety Testing of Autonomous Vehicles [86.9067793493874]
  We propose efficient mechanisms to characterize and generate testing scenarios using a state-of-the-art driving simulator. We use our method to characterize real driving data from the Next Generation Simulation (NGSIM) project. We rank the scenarios by defining metrics based on the complexity of avoiding accidents and provide insights into how the AV could have minimized the probability of incurring an accident.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-12T17:00:23Z)
• Instance-Aware Predictive Navigation in Multi-Agent Environments [93.15055834395304]
  We propose an Instance-Aware Predictive Control (IPC) approach, which forecasts interactions between agents as well as future scene structures. We adopt a novel multi-instance event prediction module to estimate the possible interaction among agents in the ego-centric view. We design a sequential action sampling strategy to better leverage predicted states on both scene-level and instance-level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-14T22:21:25Z)
• Can Autonomous Vehicles Identify, Recover From, and Adapt to Distribution Shifts? [104.04999499189402]
  Out-of-training-distribution (OOD) scenarios are a common challenge of learning agents at deployment. We propose an uncertainty-aware planning method, called emphrobust imitative planning (RIP) Our method can detect and recover from some distribution shifts, reducing the overconfident and catastrophic extrapolations in OOD scenes. We introduce an autonomous car novel-scene benchmark, textttCARNOVEL, to evaluate the robustness of driving agents to a suite of tasks with distribution shifts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T11:07:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.