Examining the Prevalence and Dynamics of AI-Generated Media in Art Subreddits

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07302v1
• Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2024 17:41:13 GMT
• Title: Examining the Prevalence and Dynamics of AI-Generated Media in Art Subreddits
• Authors: Hana Matatov, Marianne Aubin Le Quéré, Ofra Amir, Mor Naaman,
• Abstract summary: We take steps towards examining the potential impact of AI-generated content on art-related communities on Reddit. We look at image-based posts made to these communities that are transparently created by AI, or comments in these communities that suspect authors of using generative AI. We show that AI content is more readily used by newcomers and may help increase participation if it aligns with community rules.
• Score: 13.343255875002459
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Broadly accessible generative AI models like Dall-E have made it possible for anyone to create compelling visual art. In online communities, the introduction of AI-generated content (AIGC) may impact community dynamics by shifting the kinds of content being posted or the responses to content suspected of being generated by AI. We take steps towards examining the potential impact of AIGC on art-related communities on Reddit. We distinguish between communities that disallow AI content and those without a direct policy. We look at image-based posts made to these communities that are transparently created by AI, or comments in these communities that suspect authors of using generative AI. We find that AI posts (and accusations) have played a very small part in these communities through the end of 2023, accounting for fewer than 0.2% of the image-based posts. Even as the absolute number of author-labelled AI posts dwindles over time, accusations of AI use remain more persistent. We show that AI content is more readily used by newcomers and may help increase participation if it aligns with community rules. However, the tone of comments suspecting AI use by others have become more negative over time, especially in communities that do not have explicit rules about AI. Overall, the results show the changing norms and interactions around AIGC in online communities designated for creativity.

Related papers

• AI Rules? Characterizing Reddit Community Policies Towards AI-Generated Content [7.978143550070664]
  We collected the metadata and community rules for over 300,000 public subreddits. We labeled subreddits and AI rules according to existing literature and a new taxonomy specific to AI rules. Our findings illustrate the emergence of varied concerns about AI, in different community contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T15:31:41Z)
• Human Bias in the Face of AI: The Role of Human Judgement in AI Generated Text Evaluation [48.70176791365903]
  This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content. We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z)
• Particip-AI: A Democratic Surveying Framework for Anticipating Future AI Use Cases, Harms and Benefits [54.648819983899614]
  General purpose AI seems to have lowered the barriers for the public to use AI and harness its power. We introduce PARTICIP-AI, a framework for laypeople to speculate and assess AI use cases and their impacts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-21T19:12:37Z)
• "There Has To Be a Lot That We're Missing": Moderating AI-Generated Content on Reddit [5.202496456440801]
  We focus on online community moderators' experiences with AI-generated content (AIGC) Our study finds communities are choosing to enact rules restricting use of AIGC for both ideological and practical reasons. Our results highlight the importance of supporting community autonomy and self-determination in the face of this sudden technological change.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T16:15:21Z)
• Public Perception of Generative AI on Twitter: An Empirical Study Based on Occupation and Usage [7.18819534653348]
  This paper investigates users' perceptions of generative AI using 3M posts on Twitter from January 2019 to March 2023. We find that people across various occupations, not just IT-related ones, show a strong interest in generative AI. After the release of ChatGPT, people's interest in AI in general has increased dramatically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T15:30:12Z)
• Governance of the AI, by the AI, and for the AI [9.653656920225858]
  Authors believe the age of artificial intelligence has, indeed, finally arrived. Current state of AI is ushering in profound changes to many different sectors of society.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T03:29:07Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• Cybertrust: From Explainable to Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) [58.981120701284816]
  Actionable and Interpretable AI (AI2) will incorporate explicit quantifications and visualizations of user confidence in AI recommendations. It will allow examining and testing of AI system predictions to establish a basis for trust in the systems' decision making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-26T18:53:09Z)
• The Who in XAI: How AI Background Shapes Perceptions of AI Explanations [61.49776160925216]
  We conduct a mixed-methods study of how two different groups--people with and without AI background--perceive different types of AI explanations. We find that (1) both groups showed unwarranted faith in numbers for different reasons and (2) each group found value in different explanations beyond their intended design.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T17:32:04Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.