Synthetic Politics: Prevalence, Spreaders, and Emotional Reception of AI-Generated Political Images on X

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2502.11248v2
• Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 18:12:13 GMT
• Title: Synthetic Politics: Prevalence, Spreaders, and Emotional Reception of AI-Generated Political Images on X
• Authors: Zhiyi Chen, Jinyi Ye, Beverlyn Tsai, Emilio Ferrara, Luca Luceri,
• Abstract summary: We analyze a large-scale dataset from Twitter/X related to the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election.<n>We find that approximately 12% of shared images are detected as AI-generated, and around 10% of users are responsible for sharing 80% of AI-generated images.<n>Superspreaders' AI image tweets elicit more positive and less toxic responses than their non-AI image tweets.
• Score: 7.490262732933151
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Despite widespread concerns about the risks of AI-generated content (AIGC) to the integrity of social media discourse, little is known about its scale and scope, the actors responsible for its dissemination online, and the user responses it elicits. In this work, we measure and characterize the prevalence, spreaders, and emotional reception of AI-generated political images. Analyzing a large-scale dataset from Twitter/X related to the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, we find that approximately 12% of shared images are detected as AI-generated, and around 10% of users are responsible for sharing 80% of AI-generated images. AIGC superspreaders--defined as the users who not only share a high volume of AI-generated images but also receive substantial engagement through retweets--are more likely to be X Premium subscribers, have a right-leaning orientation, and exhibit automated behavior. Their profiles contain a higher proportion of AI-generated images than non-superspreaders, and some engage in extreme levels of AIGC sharing. Moreover, superspreaders' AI image tweets elicit more positive and less toxic responses than their non-AI image tweets. This study serves as one of the first steps toward understanding the role generative AI plays in shaping online socio-political environments and offers implications for platform governance.

Related papers

• The Hall of AI Fears and Hopes: Comparing the Views of AI Influencers and those of Members of the U.S. Public Through an Interactive Platform [3.253198855869374]
  The public fears AI getting out of control, while influencers emphasize regulation.<n>The views of AI influencers from underrepresented groups such as women and people of color often differ from the views of underrepresented groups in the public.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T13:21:31Z)
• Could AI Trace and Explain the Origins of AI-Generated Images and Text? [53.11173194293537]
  AI-generated content is increasingly prevalent in the real world. adversaries might exploit large multimodal models to create images that violate ethical or legal standards. Paper reviewers may misuse large language models to generate reviews without genuine intellectual effort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-05T20:51:54Z)
• Almost AI, Almost Human: The Challenge of Detecting AI-Polished Writing [55.2480439325792]
  Misclassification can lead to false plagiarism accusations and misleading claims about AI prevalence in online content. We systematically evaluate eleven state-of-the-art AI-text detectors using our AI-Polished-Text Evaluation dataset. Our findings reveal that detectors frequently misclassify even minimally polished text as AI-generated, struggle to differentiate between degrees of AI involvement, and exhibit biases against older and smaller models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-21T18:45:37Z)
• From tools to thieves: Measuring and understanding public perceptions of AI through crowdsourced metaphors [1.2461369993945386]
  We identify 20 dominant metaphors shaping public understanding of AI.<n>We find that Americans generally view AI as warm and competent.<n>These implicit perceptions, along with the identified dominant metaphors, strongly predict trust in and willingness to adopt AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-29T23:17:43Z)
• Are We in the AI-Generated Text World Already? Quantifying and Monitoring AIGT on Social Media [38.99664377299462]
  Social media platforms are experiencing a growing presence of AI-Generated Texts (AIGTs)<n>Despite its importance, a systematic study to assess the prevalence of AIGTs on social media is still lacking.<n>This paper aims to quantify, monitor, and analyze the AIGTs on online social media platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T04:04:54Z)
• AI-generated Image Quality Assessment in Visual Communication [72.11144790293086]
  AIGI-VC is a quality assessment database for AI-generated images in visual communication.<n>The dataset consists of 2,500 images spanning 14 advertisement topics and 8 emotion types.<n>It provides coarse-grained human preference annotations and fine-grained preference descriptions, benchmarking the abilities of IQA methods in preference prediction, interpretation, and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T08:47:07Z)
• MiRAGeNews: Multimodal Realistic AI-Generated News Detection [45.067211436589126]
  We propose the MiRAGeNews dataset to combat the spread of AI-generated fake news. Our dataset poses a significant challenge to humans. We train a multi-modal detector that improves by +5.1% F-1 over state-of-the-art baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-11T17:58:02Z)
• Examining the Prevalence and Dynamics of AI-Generated Media in Art Subreddits [13.343255875002459]
  We take steps towards examining the potential impact of AI-generated content on art-related communities on Reddit. We look at image-based posts made to these communities that are transparently created by AI, or comments in these communities that suspect authors of using generative AI. We show that AI content is more readily used by newcomers and may help increase participation if it aligns with community rules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:41:13Z)
• Human Bias in the Face of AI: The Role of Human Judgement in AI Generated Text Evaluation [48.70176791365903]
  This study explores how bias shapes the perception of AI versus human generated content. We investigated how human raters respond to labeled and unlabeled content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-29T04:31:45Z)
• AI-Generated Faces in the Real World: A Large-Scale Case Study of Twitter Profile Images [26.891299948581782]
  We conduct the first large-scale investigation of the prevalence of AI-generated profile pictures on Twitter. Our analysis of nearly 15 million Twitter profile pictures shows that 0.052% were artificially generated, confirming their notable presence on the platform. The results also reveal several motives, including spamming and political amplification campaigns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T14:57:17Z)
• AIGIQA-20K: A Large Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment [54.93996119324928]
  We create the largest AIGI subjective quality database to date with 20,000 AIGIs and 420,000 subjective ratings, known as AIGIQA-20K. We conduct benchmark experiments on this database to assess the correspondence between 16 mainstream AIGI quality models and human perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T12:12:24Z)
• How Spammers and Scammers Leverage AI-Generated Images on Facebook for Audience Growth [0.9865722130817715]
  We show that spammers and scammers are already using AI-generated images to gain significant traction on Facebook. At times, the Facebook Feed is recommending unlabeled AI-generated images to users who neither follow the Pages posting the images nor realize that the images are AI-generated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T15:43:16Z)
• Understanding the Impact of AI Generated Content on Social Media: The Pixiv Case [9.99562453779203]
  We present a comprehensive study of Pixiv, an online community for artists who wish to share and receive feedback on their illustrations. Based on a dataset of 15.2 million posts (including 2.4 million AI-generated images), we measure the impact of AIGC on the community. Our results offer key insight to how AIGC is changing the dynamics of social media platforms like Pixiv.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T16:39:34Z)
• TWIGMA: A dataset of AI-Generated Images with Metadata From Twitter [29.77283532841167]
  We introduce TWIGMA, a dataset encompassing over 800,000 gen-AI images collected from Jan 2021 to March 2023 on Twitter. We find that gen-AI images possess distinctive characteristics and exhibit, on average, lower variability when compared to their non-gen-AI counterparts. We observe a longitudinal shift in the themes of AI-generated images on Twitter, with users increasingly sharing artistically sophisticated content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T07:27:57Z)
• Seeing is not always believing: Benchmarking Human and Model Perception of AI-Generated Images [66.20578637253831]
  There is a growing concern that the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology may produce fake photos. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate agents for distinguishing state-of-the-art AI-generated visual content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T17:51:59Z)
• Fairness in AI and Its Long-Term Implications on Society [68.8204255655161]
  We take a closer look at AI fairness and analyze how lack of AI fairness can lead to deepening of biases over time. We discuss how biased models can lead to more negative real-world outcomes for certain groups. If the issues persist, they could be reinforced by interactions with other risks and have severe implications on society in the form of social unrest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-16T11:22:59Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of AI-Generated Content (AIGC): A History of Generative AI from GAN to ChatGPT [63.58711128819828]
  ChatGPT and other Generative AI (GAI) techniques belong to the category of Artificial Intelligence Generated Content (AIGC) The goal of AIGC is to make the content creation process more efficient and accessible, allowing for the production of high-quality content at a faster pace.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T20:36:13Z)
• Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
  In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society. A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests. This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.