Careful About What App Promotion Ads Recommend! Detecting and Explaining Malware Promotion via App Promotion Graph
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07588v1
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 03:39:13 GMT
- Title: Careful About What App Promotion Ads Recommend! Detecting and Explaining Malware Promotion via App Promotion Graph
- Authors: Shang Ma, Chaoran Chen, Shao Yang, Shifu Hou, Toby Jia-Jun Li, Xusheng Xiao, Tao Xie, Yanfang Ye,
- Abstract summary: In Android apps, their developers frequently place app promotion ads, namely advertisements to promote other apps.
The inadequate vetting of ad content allows malicious developers to exploit app promotion ads as a new distribution channel for malware.
We propose a novel approach, named ADGPE, that integrates app user interface exploration with graph learning to automatically collect app promotion ads, detect malware promoted by these ads, and explain the promotion mechanisms employed by the detected malware.
- Score: 25.180100700815466
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In Android apps, their developers frequently place app promotion ads, namely advertisements to promote other apps. Unfortunately, the inadequate vetting of ad content allows malicious developers to exploit app promotion ads as a new distribution channel for malware. To help detect malware distributed via app promotion ads, in this paper, we propose a novel approach, named ADGPE, that synergistically integrates app user interface (UI) exploration with graph learning to automatically collect app promotion ads, detect malware promoted by these ads, and explain the promotion mechanisms employed by the detected malware. Our evaluation on 18, 627 app promotion ads demonstrates the substantial risks in the app promotion ecosystem.
Related papers
- Beyond App Markets: Demystifying Underground Mobile App Distribution Via Telegram [23.638100691705482]
This study provides the first comprehensive exploration of the underground mobile app ecosystem on Telegram.
Our findings reveal the significant prevalence of these apps on Telegram, with the total sum of subscription user numbers promoting these apps equivalent to 1% of Telegram's user base.
Our analysis also exposes the misuse of iOS features for app distribution and the prevalence of malicious behaviors in these apps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-06T23:55:39Z) - Users Feel Guilty: Measurement of Illegal Software Installation Guide Videos on YouTube for Malware Distribution [3.0664883500280986]
This study introduces and examines a sophisticated malware distribution technique that exploits popular video sharing platforms.
In this attack, threat actors distribute malware through deceptive content that promises free versions of premium software and game cheats.
MalTube is particularly insidious because it exploits the guilt feelings of users for engaging in potentially illegal activity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T02:32:52Z) - ModZoo: A Large-Scale Study of Modded Android Apps and their Markets [6.574756524825567]
We analyse over 146k (thousand) apps obtained from 13 of the most popular modded app markets.
Around 90% of apps we collect are altered in some way when compared to the official counterparts on Google Play.
Modifications include games cheats, such as infinite coins or lives; mainstream apps with premium features provided for free; and apps with modified advertising identifiers or excluded ads.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-15T16:53:26Z) - Long-Term Ad Memorability: Understanding & Generating Memorable Ads [54.23854539909078]
There has been no large-scale study on the memorability of ads.
We release the first memorability dataset, LAMBDA, consisting of 1749 participants and 2205 ads covering 276 brands.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-01T10:27:04Z) - Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads [70.02478301291264]
We develop a new methodology for black-box auditing of algorithms for discrimination in the delivery of job advertisements.
Our first contribution is to identify the distinction between skew in ad delivery due to protected categories such as gender or race.
Second, we develop an auditing methodology that distinguishes between skew explainable by differences in qualifications from other factors.
Third, we apply our proposed methodology to two prominent targeted advertising platforms for job ads: Facebook and LinkedIn.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-04-09T17:38:36Z) - An Empirical Study of In-App Advertising Issues Based on Large Scale App
Review Analysis [67.58267006314415]
We present a large-scale analysis on ad-related user feedback from App Store and Google Play.
From a statistical analysis of 36,309 ad-related reviews, we find that users care most about the number of unique ads and ad display frequency during usage.
Some ad issue types are addressed more quickly by developers than other ad issues.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-22T05:38:24Z) - Dynamic Knapsack Optimization Towards Efficient Multi-Channel Sequential
Advertising [52.3825928886714]
We formulate the sequential advertising strategy optimization as a dynamic knapsack problem.
We propose a theoretically guaranteed bilevel optimization framework, which significantly reduces the solution space of the original optimization space.
To improve the exploration efficiency of reinforcement learning, we also devise an effective action space reduction approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-29T18:50:35Z) - Do Interruptions Pay Off? Effects of Interruptive Ads on Consumers
Willingness to Pay [79.9312329825761]
We present the results of a study designed to measure the impact of interruptive advertising on consumers willingness to pay for products bearing the advertiser's brand.
Our results contribute to the research on the economic impact of advertising, and introduce a method of measuring actual (as opposed to self-reported) willingness to pay in experimental marketing research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-14T09:26:57Z) - adPerf: Characterizing the Performance of Third-party Ads [5.9535711951131205]
We apply an in-depth and first-of-a-kind performance evaluation of web ads.
We aim to characterize the cost by every component of an ad, so the publisher, ad syndicate, and advertiser can improve the ad's performance with detailed guidance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-02-06T02:09:05Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.