An Empirical Study of In-App Advertising Issues Based on Large Scale App Review Analysis

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2008.12112v1
• Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 05:38:24 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Study of In-App Advertising Issues Based on Large Scale App Review Analysis
• Authors: Cuiyun Gao, Jichuan Zeng, David Lo, Xin Xia, Irwin King, Michael R. Lyu
• Abstract summary: We present a large-scale analysis on ad-related user feedback from App Store and Google Play. From a statistical analysis of 36,309 ad-related reviews, we find that users care most about the number of unique ads and ad display frequency during usage. Some ad issue types are addressed more quickly by developers than other ad issues.
• Score: 67.58267006314415
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In-app advertising closely relates to app revenue. Reckless ad integration could adversely impact app reliability and user experience, leading to loss of income. It is very challenging to balance the ad revenue and user experience for app developers. In this paper, we present a large-scale analysis on ad-related user feedback. The large user feedback data from App Store and Google Play allow us to summarize ad-related app issues comprehensively and thus provide practical ad integration strategies for developers. We first define common ad issues by manually labeling a statistically representative sample of ad-related feedback, and then build an automatic classifier to categorize ad-related feedback. We study the relations between different ad issues and user ratings to identify the ad issues poorly scored by users. We also explore the fix durations of ad issues across platforms for extracting insights into prioritizing ad issues for ad maintenance. We summarize 15 types of ad issues by manually annotating 903/36,309 ad-related user reviews. From a statistical analysis of 36,309 ad-related reviews, we find that users care most about the number of unique ads and ad display frequency during usage. Besides, users tend to give relatively lower ratings when they report the security and notification related issues. Regarding different platforms, we observe that the distributions of ad issues are significantly different between App Store and Google Play. Moreover, some ad issue types are addressed more quickly by developers than other ad issues. We believe the findings we discovered can benefit app developers towards balancing ad revenue and user experience while ensuring app reliability.

Related papers

• Careful About What App Promotion Ads Recommend! Detecting and Explaining Malware Promotion via App Promotion Graph [25.180100700815466]
  In Android apps, their developers frequently place app promotion ads, namely advertisements to promote other apps. The inadequate vetting of ad content allows malicious developers to exploit app promotion ads as a new distribution channel for malware. We propose a novel approach, named ADGPE, that integrates app user interface exploration with graph learning to automatically collect app promotion ads, detect malware promoted by these ads, and explain the promotion mechanisms employed by the detected malware.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T03:39:13Z)
• Advertiser Content Understanding via LLMs for Google Ads Safety [9.376815457907195]
  This study proposes a method to understand advertiser's intent for content policy violations, using Large Language Models (LLMs) We generate advertiser's content profile based on multiple signals from their ads, domains, targeting info, etc. After minimal prompt tuning our method was able to reach 95% accuracy on a small test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T00:57:51Z)
• Why am I Still Seeing This: Measuring the Effectiveness Of Ad Controls and Explanations in AI-Mediated Ad Targeting Systems [55.02903075972816]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of Meta's "See less" ad control and the actionability of ad targeting explanations following the shift to AI-mediated targeting. We find that utilizing the "See less" ad control for the topics we study does not significantly reduce the number of ads shown by Meta on these topics. We find that the majority of ad targeting explanations for local ads made no reference to location-specific targeting criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T18:03:11Z)
• Long-Term Ad Memorability: Understanding & Generating Memorable Ads [54.23854539909078]
  There has been no large-scale study on the memorability of ads. We release the first memorability dataset, LAMBDA, consisting of 1749 participants and 2205 ads covering 276 brands.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T10:27:04Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• Problematic Advertising and its Disparate Exposure on Facebook [15.667983888666312]
  We study Facebook and investigate key gaps in our understanding of problematic online advertising. We find that older people and minority groups are especially likely to be shown such ads. Given that 22% of problematic ads had no specific targeting from advertisers, we infer that ad delivery algorithms played a significant role in the biased distribution of these ads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-09T17:23:59Z)
• AI-Driven Contextual Advertising: A Technology Report and Implication Analysis [0.0]
  Programmatic advertising consists in automated auctioning of digital ad space. The interest in contextual advertising is in part a counterreaction to the current dependency on personal data. Developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) allow for a deeper semantic understanding of context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-02T13:44:58Z)
• Auditing for Discrimination in Algorithms Delivering Job Ads [70.02478301291264]
  We develop a new methodology for black-box auditing of algorithms for discrimination in the delivery of job advertisements. Our first contribution is to identify the distinction between skew in ad delivery due to protected categories such as gender or race. Second, we develop an auditing methodology that distinguishes between skew explainable by differences in qualifications from other factors. Third, we apply our proposed methodology to two prominent targeted advertising platforms for job ads: Facebook and LinkedIn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-09T17:38:36Z)
• Causal Inference in the Presence of Interference in Sponsored Search Advertising [11.514573594428352]
  In this paper, we leverage the language of causal inference in the presence of interference to model interactions among the ads. We illustrate the utility of our formalization through experiments carried out on the ad placement system of the Bing search engine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T01:13:14Z)
• Do Interruptions Pay Off? Effects of Interruptive Ads on Consumers Willingness to Pay [79.9312329825761]
  We present the results of a study designed to measure the impact of interruptive advertising on consumers willingness to pay for products bearing the advertiser's brand. Our results contribute to the research on the economic impact of advertising, and introduce a method of measuring actual (as opposed to self-reported) willingness to pay in experimental marketing research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-14T09:26:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.