Understanding the Statistical Accuracy-Communication Trade-off in Personalized Federated Learning with Minimax Guarantees

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08934v4
• Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2025 06:17:31 GMT
• Title: Understanding the Statistical Accuracy-Communication Trade-off in Personalized Federated Learning with Minimax Guarantees
• Authors: Xin Yu, Zelin He, Ying Sun, Lingzhou Xue, Runze Li,
• Abstract summary: This work considers a personalized federated learning setting that simultaneously learns global and local models.<n>While purely local training has no communication, collaborative learning can leverage knowledge to improve statistical accuracy.
• Score: 21.202284638968496
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Personalized federated learning (PFL) offers a flexible framework for aggregating information across distributed clients with heterogeneous data. This work considers a personalized federated learning setting that simultaneously learns global and local models. While purely local training has no communication cost, collaborative learning among the clients can leverage shared knowledge to improve statistical accuracy, presenting an accuracy-communication trade-off in personalized federated learning. However, the theoretical analysis of how personalization quantitatively influences sample and algorithmic efficiency and their inherent trade-off is largely unexplored. This paper makes a contribution towards filling this gap, by providing a quantitative characterization of the personalization degree on the tradeoff. The results further offers theoretical insights for choosing the personalization degree. As a side contribution, we establish the minimax optimality in terms of statistical accuracy for a widely studied PFL formulation. The theoretical result is validated on both synthetic and real-world datasets and its generalizability is verified in a non-convex setting.

Related papers

• On ADMM in Heterogeneous Federated Learning: Personalization, Robustness, and Fairness [16.595935469099306]
  We propose FLAME, an optimization framework by utilizing the alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) to train personalized and global models. Our theoretical analysis establishes the global convergence and two kinds of convergence rates for FLAME under mild assumptions. Our experimental findings show that FLAME outperforms state-of-the-art methods in convergence and accuracy, and it achieves higher test accuracy under various attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T11:35:42Z)
• Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
  We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios. We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples. Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z)
• FedMAP: Unlocking Potential in Personalized Federated Learning through Bi-Level MAP Optimization [11.040916982022978]
  Federated Learning (FL) enables collaborative training of machine learning models on decentralized data. Data across clients often differs significantly due to class imbalance, feature distribution skew, sample size imbalance, and other phenomena. We propose a novel Bayesian PFL framework using bi-level optimization to tackle the data heterogeneity challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T11:28:06Z)
• Achievable Fairness on Your Data With Utility Guarantees [16.78730663293352]
  In machine learning fairness, training models that minimize disparity across different sensitive groups often leads to diminished accuracy. We present a computationally efficient approach to approximate the fairness-accuracy trade-off curve tailored to individual datasets. We introduce a novel methodology for quantifying uncertainty in our estimates, thereby providing practitioners with a robust framework for auditing model fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T00:59:32Z)
• Bayesian Nonparametrics Meets Data-Driven Distributionally Robust Optimization [29.24821214671497]
  Training machine learning and statistical models often involve optimizing a data-driven risk criterion. We propose a novel robust criterion by combining insights from Bayesian nonparametric (i.e., Dirichlet process) theory and a recent decision-theoretic model of smooth ambiguity-averse preferences. For practical implementation, we propose and study tractable approximations of the criterion based on well-known Dirichlet process representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T21:19:15Z)
• Federated Learning with Projected Trajectory Regularization [65.6266768678291]
  Federated learning enables joint training of machine learning models from distributed clients without sharing their local data. One key challenge in federated learning is to handle non-identically distributed data across the clients. We propose a novel federated learning framework with projected trajectory regularization (FedPTR) for tackling the data issue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T02:12:08Z)
• Feature Norm Regularized Federated Learning: Transforming Skewed Distributions into Global Insights [16.039822050613022]
  This work introduces the Feature Norm Regularized Federated Learning (FNR-FL) algorithm. FNR-FL incorporates class average feature norms to enhance model accuracy and convergence in non-i.i.d. scenarios. We show that FNR-FL exhibits a substantial 66.24% improvement in accuracy and a significant 11.40% reduction in training time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-12T03:09:37Z)
• pFedES: Model Heterogeneous Personalized Federated Learning with Feature Extractor Sharing [19.403843478569303]
  We propose a model-heterogeneous personalized Federated learning approach based on feature extractor sharing. It incorporates a small homogeneous feature extractor into each client's heterogeneous local model. It achieves 1.61% higher test accuracy, while reducing communication and computation costs by 99.6% and 82.9%, respectively.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-12T15:43:39Z)
• Federated Deep Equilibrium Learning: Harnessing Compact Global Representations to Enhance Personalization [23.340237814344377]
  Federated Learning (FL) has emerged as a groundbreaking distributed learning paradigm enabling clients to train a global model collaboratively without exchanging data. We introduce FeDEQ, a novel FL framework that incorporates deep equilibrium learning and consensus optimization to harness compact global data representations for efficient personalization. We show that FeDEQ matches the performance of state-of-the-art personalized FL methods, while significantly reducing communication size by up to 4 times and memory footprint by 1.5 times during training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-27T13:48:12Z)
• Efficient Personalized Federated Learning via Sparse Model-Adaptation [47.088124462925684]
  Federated Learning (FL) aims to train machine learning models for multiple clients without sharing their own private data. We propose pFedGate for efficient personalized FL by adaptively and efficiently learning sparse local models. We show that pFedGate achieves superior global accuracy, individual accuracy and efficiency simultaneously over state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-04T12:21:34Z)
• Personalized Federated Learning under Mixture of Distributions [98.25444470990107]
  We propose a novel approach to Personalized Federated Learning (PFL), which utilizes Gaussian mixture models (GMM) to fit the input data distributions across diverse clients. FedGMM possesses an additional advantage of adapting to new clients with minimal overhead, and it also enables uncertainty quantification. Empirical evaluations on synthetic and benchmark datasets demonstrate the superior performance of our method in both PFL classification and novel sample detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-01T20:04:46Z)
• Personalizing Federated Learning with Over-the-Air Computations [84.8089761800994]
  Federated edge learning is a promising technology to deploy intelligence at the edge of wireless networks in a privacy-preserving manner. Under such a setting, multiple clients collaboratively train a global generic model under the coordination of an edge server. This paper presents a distributed training paradigm that employs analog over-the-air computation to address the communication bottleneck.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T08:41:19Z)
• FedSkip: Combatting Statistical Heterogeneity with Federated Skip Aggregation [95.85026305874824]
  We introduce a data-driven approach called FedSkip to improve the client optima by periodically skipping federated averaging and scattering local models to the cross devices. We conduct extensive experiments on a range of datasets to demonstrate that FedSkip achieves much higher accuracy, better aggregation efficiency and competing communication efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-14T13:57:01Z)
• DRFLM: Distributionally Robust Federated Learning with Inter-client Noise via Local Mixup [58.894901088797376]
  federated learning has emerged as a promising approach for training a global model using data from multiple organizations without leaking their raw data. We propose a general framework to solve the above two challenges simultaneously. We provide comprehensive theoretical analysis including robustness analysis, convergence analysis, and generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-16T08:08:29Z)
• Personalization Improves Privacy-Accuracy Tradeoffs in Federated Optimization [57.98426940386627]
  We show that coordinating local learning with private centralized learning yields a generically useful and improved tradeoff between accuracy and privacy. We illustrate our theoretical results with experiments on synthetic and real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-10T20:44:44Z)
• Leveraging Unlabeled Data to Predict Out-of-Distribution Performance [63.740181251997306]
  Real-world machine learning deployments are characterized by mismatches between the source (training) and target (test) distributions. In this work, we investigate methods for predicting the target domain accuracy using only labeled source data and unlabeled target data. We propose Average Thresholded Confidence (ATC), a practical method that learns a threshold on the model's confidence, predicting accuracy as the fraction of unlabeled examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T23:01:12Z)
• Differential privacy and robust statistics in high dimensions [49.50869296871643]
  High-dimensional Propose-Test-Release (HPTR) builds upon three crucial components: the exponential mechanism, robust statistics, and the Propose-Test-Release mechanism. We show that HPTR nearly achieves the optimal sample complexity under several scenarios studied in the literature.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-12T06:36:40Z)
• Distributionally Robust Learning with Stable Adversarial Training [34.74504615726101]
  Machine learning algorithms with empirical risk minimization are vulnerable under distributional shifts. We propose a novel Stable Adversarial Learning (SAL) algorithm that leverages heterogeneous data sources to construct a more practical uncertainty set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-30T03:05:45Z)
• Towards Fair Federated Learning with Zero-Shot Data Augmentation [123.37082242750866]
  Federated learning has emerged as an important distributed learning paradigm, where a server aggregates a global model from many client-trained models while having no access to the client data. We propose a novel federated learning system that employs zero-shot data augmentation on under-represented data to mitigate statistical heterogeneity and encourage more uniform accuracy performance across clients in federated networks. We study two variants of this scheme, Fed-ZDAC (federated learning with zero-shot data augmentation at the clients) and Fed-ZDAS (federated learning with zero-shot data augmentation at the server).
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-27T18:23:54Z)
• Toward Understanding the Influence of Individual Clients in Federated Learning [52.07734799278535]
  Federated learning allows clients to jointly train a global model without sending their private data to a central server. We defined a new notion called em-Influence, quantify this influence over parameters, and proposed an effective efficient model to estimate this metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-20T14:34:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.