Solving the Challenge Set without Solving the Task: On Winograd Schemas as a Test of Pronominal Coreference Resolution
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09448v1
- Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 09:04:53 GMT
- Title: Solving the Challenge Set without Solving the Task: On Winograd Schemas as a Test of Pronominal Coreference Resolution
- Authors: Ian Porada, Jackie Chi Kit Cheung,
- Abstract summary: We show that despite the strong performance of prompted language models (LMs) on the Winograd Challenge set, these same modeling techniques perform relatively poorly at resolving certain pronominal ambiguities attested in OntoNotes.
We propose a method for ensembling a prompted LM with a supervised, task-specific system that is overall more accurate at resolving pronominal coreference across datasets.
- Score: 21.19369044026899
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Challenge sets such as the Winograd Schema Challenge (WSC) are used to benchmark systems' ability to resolve ambiguities in natural language. If one assumes as in existing work that solving a given challenge set is at least as difficult as solving some more general task, then high performance on the challenge set should indicate high performance on the general task overall. However, we show empirically that this assumption of difficulty does not always hold. In particular, we demonstrate that despite the strong performance of prompted language models (LMs) on the WSC and its variants, these same modeling techniques perform relatively poorly at resolving certain pronominal ambiguities attested in OntoNotes and related datasets that are perceived to be easier. Motivated by these findings, we propose a method for ensembling a prompted LM with a supervised, task-specific system that is overall more accurate at resolving pronominal coreference across datasets. Finally, we emphasize that datasets involving the same linguistic phenomenon draw on distinct, but overlapping, capabilities, and evaluating on any one dataset alone does not provide a complete picture of a system's overall capability.
Related papers
- Easy2Hard-Bench: Standardized Difficulty Labels for Profiling LLM Performance and Generalization [126.27645170941268]
We present Easy2Hard-Bench, a collection of 6 benchmark datasets spanning various domains.
Each problem within these datasets is annotated with numerical difficulty scores.
We provide a comprehensive analysis of their performance and generalization capabilities across varying levels of difficulty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-27T03:49:56Z) - Investigating a Benchmark for Training-set free Evaluation of Linguistic Capabilities in Machine Reading Comprehension [12.09297288867446]
We examine a framework for evaluating optimised models in training-set free setting on synthetically generated challenge sets.
We find that despite the simplicity of the generation method, the data can compete with crowd-sourced datasets with regard to naturalness and lexical diversity.
We conduct further experiments and show that state-of-the-art language model-based MRC systems can learn to succeed on the challenge set correctly.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-09T12:23:36Z) - Uncertainty Aware Learning for Language Model Alignment [97.36361196793929]
We propose uncertainty-aware learning (UAL) to improve the model alignment of different task scenarios.
We implement UAL in a simple fashion -- adaptively setting the label smoothing value of training according to the uncertainty of individual samples.
Experiments on widely used benchmarks demonstrate that our UAL significantly and consistently outperforms standard supervised fine-tuning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-07T11:37:45Z) - Detecting Multimodal Situations with Insufficient Context and Abstaining from Baseless Predictions [75.45274978665684]
Vision-Language Understanding (VLU) benchmarks contain samples where answers rely on assumptions unsupported by the provided context.
We collect contextual data for each sample whenever available and train a context selection module to facilitate evidence-based model predictions.
We develop a general-purpose Context-AwaRe Abstention detector to identify samples lacking sufficient context and enhance model accuracy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-18T02:21:32Z) - LaSagnA: Language-based Segmentation Assistant for Complex Queries [39.620806493454616]
Large Language Models for Vision (vLLMs) generate detailed perceptual outcomes, including bounding boxes and masks.
In this study, we acknowledge that the main cause of these problems is the insufficient complexity of training queries.
We present three novel strategies to effectively handle the challenges arising from the direct integration of the proposed format.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-12T14:40:45Z) - Evaluating the Capabilities of Multi-modal Reasoning Models with
Synthetic Task Data [0.0]
We leverage advances in high resolution text-to-image generation to develop a framework for generating evaluation data for multi-modal reasoning tasks.
We apply this framework to generate context-dependent anomaly data, creating a synthetic dataset on a challenging task.
We demonstrate that while the task is tractable, the model performs significantly worse on the context-dependent anomaly detection task than on standard VQA tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-01T20:56:34Z) - Leveraging sparse and shared feature activations for disentangled
representation learning [112.22699167017471]
We propose to leverage knowledge extracted from a diversified set of supervised tasks to learn a common disentangled representation.
We validate our approach on six real world distribution shift benchmarks, and different data modalities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-17T01:33:24Z) - Exposing and Addressing Cross-Task Inconsistency in Unified
Vision-Language Models [80.23791222509644]
Inconsistent AI models are considered brittle and untrustworthy by human users.
We find that state-of-the-art vision-language models suffer from a surprisingly high degree of inconsistent behavior across tasks.
We propose a rank correlation-based auxiliary training objective, computed over large automatically created cross-task contrast sets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-28T16:57:12Z) - A Brief Survey and Comparative Study of Recent Development of Pronoun
Coreference Resolution [55.39835612617972]
Pronoun Coreference Resolution (PCR) is the task of resolving pronominal expressions to all mentions they refer to.
As one important natural language understanding (NLU) component, pronoun resolution is crucial for many downstream tasks and still challenging for existing models.
We conduct extensive experiments to show that even though current models are achieving good performance on the standard evaluation set, they are still not ready to be used in real applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-27T01:40:01Z) - Semantic Complexity in End-to-End Spoken Language Understanding [20.184305170102082]
We analyze the relationship between the performance of STI models and the difficulty of the use case to which they are applied.
We show that near-perfect performance metrics for STI models reported in the literature were obtained with datasets with low semantic complexity values.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-08-06T20:18:53Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.