Evaluating of Machine Unlearning: Robustness Verification Without Prior Modifications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10120v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 03:19:14 GMT
• Title: Evaluating of Machine Unlearning: Robustness Verification Without Prior Modifications
• Authors: Heng Xu, Tianqing Zhu, Wanlei Zhou,
• Abstract summary: Unlearning is a process enabling pre-trained models to remove the influence of specific training samples. Existing verification methods rely on machine learning attack techniques, such as membership inference attacks (MIAs) or backdoor attacks. We propose a novel verification scheme without any prior modifications, and can support verification on a much larger set.
• Score: 15.257558809246524
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Machine unlearning, a process enabling pre-trained models to remove the influence of specific training samples, has attracted significant attention in recent years. While extensive research has focused on developing efficient unlearning strategies, the critical aspect of unlearning verification has been largely overlooked. Existing verification methods mainly rely on machine learning attack techniques, such as membership inference attacks (MIAs) or backdoor attacks. However, these methods, not being formally designed for verification purposes, exhibit limitations in robustness and only support a small, predefined subset of samples. Moreover, dependence on prepared sample-level modifications of MIAs or backdoor attacks restricts their applicability in Machine Learning as a Service (MLaaS) environments. To address these limitations, we propose a novel robustness verification scheme without any prior modifications, and can support verification on a much larger set. Our scheme employs an optimization-based method to recover the actual training samples from the model. By comparative analysis of recovered samples extracted pre- and post-unlearning, MLaaS users can verify the unlearning process. This verification scheme, operating exclusively through model parameters, avoids the need for any sample-level modifications prior to model training while supporting verification on a much larger set and maintaining robustness. The effectiveness of our proposed approach is demonstrated through theoretical analysis and experiments involving diverse models on various datasets in different scenarios.

Related papers

• Towards Understanding the Feasibility of Machine Unlearning [14.177012256360635]
  We present a set of novel metrics for quantifying the difficulty of unlearning. Specifically, we propose several metrics to assess the conditions necessary for a successful unlearning operation. We also present a ranking mechanism to identify the most challenging samples to unlearn.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T23:41:42Z)
• Unlearning with Control: Assessing Real-world Utility for Large Language Model Unlearning [97.2995389188179]
  Recent research has begun to approach large language models (LLMs) unlearning via gradient ascent (GA) Despite their simplicity and efficiency, we suggest that GA-based methods face the propensity towards excessive unlearning. We propose several controlling methods that can regulate the extent of excessive unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• IoTGeM: Generalizable Models for Behaviour-Based IoT Attack Detection [3.3772986620114387]
  We present an approach for modelling IoT network attacks that focuses on generalizability, yet also leads to better detection and performance. First, we present an improved rolling window approach for feature extraction, and introduce a multi-step feature selection process that reduces overfitting. Second, we build and test models using isolated train and test datasets, thereby avoiding common data leaks. Third, we rigorously evaluate our methodology using a diverse portfolio of machine learning models, evaluation metrics and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T21:46:43Z)
• Model Sparsity Can Simplify Machine Unlearning [33.18951938708467]
  In response to recent data regulation requirements, machine unlearning (MU) has emerged as a critical process. Our study introduces a novel model-based perspective: model sparsification via weight pruning. We show in both theory and practice that model sparsity can boost the multi-criteria unlearning performance of an approximate unlearner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-11T02:12:02Z)
• A Generative Framework for Low-Cost Result Validation of Machine Learning-as-a-Service Inference [4.478182379059458]
  Fides is a novel framework for real-time integrity validation of ML-as-a-Service (ML) inference. Fides features a client-side attack detection model that uses statistical analysis and divergence measurements to identify, with a high likelihood, if the service model is under attack. We devised a generative adversarial network framework for training the attack detection and re-classification models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T19:17:30Z)
• Generalization Properties of Retrieval-based Models [50.35325326050263]
  Retrieval-based machine learning methods have enjoyed success on a wide range of problems. Despite growing literature showcasing the promise of these models, the theoretical underpinning for such models remains underexplored. We present a formal treatment of retrieval-based models to characterize their generalization ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T00:33:01Z)
• Improving Meta-learning for Low-resource Text Classification and Generation via Memory Imitation [87.98063273826702]
  We propose a memory imitation meta-learning (MemIML) method that enhances the model's reliance on support sets for task adaptation. A theoretical analysis is provided to prove the effectiveness of our method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-22T12:41:55Z)
• Predictive machine learning for prescriptive applications: a coupled training-validating approach [77.34726150561087]
  We propose a new method for training predictive machine learning models for prescriptive applications. This approach is based on tweaking the validation step in the standard training-validating-testing scheme. Several experiments with synthetic data demonstrate promising results in reducing the prescription costs in both deterministic and real models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T15:03:20Z)
• Model-agnostic and Scalable Counterfactual Explanations via Reinforcement Learning [0.5729426778193398]
  We propose a deep reinforcement learning approach that transforms the optimization procedure into an end-to-end learnable process. Our experiments on real-world data show that our method is model-agnostic, relying only on feedback from model predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-04T16:54:36Z)
• Transfer Learning without Knowing: Reprogramming Black-box Machine Learning Models with Scarce Data and Limited Resources [78.72922528736011]
  We propose a novel approach, black-box adversarial reprogramming (BAR), that repurposes a well-trained black-box machine learning model. Using zeroth order optimization and multi-label mapping techniques, BAR can reprogram a black-box ML model solely based on its input-output responses. BAR outperforms state-of-the-art methods and yields comparable performance to the vanilla adversarial reprogramming method.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-17T01:52:34Z)
• Prototypical Contrastive Learning of Unsupervised Representations [171.3046900127166]
  Prototypical Contrastive Learning (PCL) is an unsupervised representation learning method. PCL implicitly encodes semantic structures of the data into the learned embedding space. PCL outperforms state-of-the-art instance-wise contrastive learning methods on multiple benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-11T09:53:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.