Towards Understanding the Feasibility of Machine Unlearning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03043v1
• Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 23:41:42 GMT
• Title: Towards Understanding the Feasibility of Machine Unlearning
• Authors: Mahtab Sarvmaili, Hassan Sajjad, Ga Wu,
• Abstract summary: We present a set of novel metrics for quantifying the difficulty of unlearning. Specifically, we propose several metrics to assess the conditions necessary for a successful unlearning operation. We also present a ranking mechanism to identify the most challenging samples to unlearn.
• Score: 14.177012256360635
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: In light of recent privacy regulations, machine unlearning has attracted significant attention in the research community. However, current studies predominantly assess the overall success of unlearning approaches, overlooking the varying difficulty of unlearning individual training samples. As a result, the broader feasibility of machine unlearning remains under-explored. This paper presents a set of novel metrics for quantifying the difficulty of unlearning by jointly considering the properties of target model and data distribution. Specifically, we propose several heuristics to assess the conditions necessary for a successful unlearning operation, examine the variations in unlearning difficulty across different training samples, and present a ranking mechanism to identify the most challenging samples to unlearn. We highlight the effectiveness of the Kernelized Stein Discrepancy (KSD), a parameterized kernel function tailored to each model and dataset, as a heuristic for evaluating unlearning difficulty. Our approach is validated through multiple classification tasks and established machine unlearning algorithms, demonstrating the practical feasibility of unlearning operations across diverse scenarios.

Related papers

• Unlearning in- vs. out-of-distribution data in LLMs under gradient-based method [31.268301764230525]
  This work formalizes a metric to evaluate unlearning quality in generative models. We use it to assess the trade-offs between unlearning quality and performance. We further evaluate how example's memorization and difficulty affect unlearning under a classical gradient ascent-based approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T03:02:09Z)
• Evaluating of Machine Unlearning: Robustness Verification Without Prior Modifications [15.257558809246524]
  Unlearning is a process enabling pre-trained models to remove the influence of specific training samples. Existing verification methods rely on machine learning attack techniques, such as membership inference attacks (MIAs) or backdoor attacks. We propose a novel verification scheme without any prior modifications, and can support verification on a much larger set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T03:19:14Z)
• Unlearning with Control: Assessing Real-world Utility for Large Language Model Unlearning [97.2995389188179]
  Recent research has begun to approach large language models (LLMs) unlearning via gradient ascent (GA) Despite their simplicity and efficiency, we suggest that GA-based methods face the propensity towards excessive unlearning. We propose several controlling methods that can regulate the extent of excessive unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• Machine Unlearning in Contrastive Learning [3.6218162133579694]
  We introduce a novel gradient constraint-based approach for training the model to effectively achieve machine unlearning. Our approach demonstrates proficient performance not only on contrastive learning models but also on supervised learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-12T16:09:01Z)
• Towards Lifecycle Unlearning Commitment Management: Measuring Sample-level Approximate Unlearning Completeness [30.596695293390415]
  We introduce the task of Lifecycle Unlearning Commitment Management (LUCM) for approximate unlearning. We propose an efficient metric designed to assess the sample-level unlearning completeness. We show that this metric is able to serve as a tool for monitoring unlearning anomalies throughout the unlearning lifecycle.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T15:37:27Z)
• Frugal Reinforcement-based Active Learning [12.18340575383456]
  We propose a novel active learning approach for label-efficient training. The proposed method is iterative and aims at minimizing a constrained objective function that mixes diversity, representativity and uncertainty criteria. We also introduce a novel weighting mechanism based on reinforcement learning, which adaptively balances these criteria at each training iteration.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-09T14:17:45Z)
• NEVIS'22: A Stream of 100 Tasks Sampled from 30 Years of Computer Vision Research [96.53307645791179]
  We introduce the Never-Ending VIsual-classification Stream (NEVIS'22), a benchmark consisting of a stream of over 100 visual classification tasks. Despite being limited to classification, the resulting stream has a rich diversity of tasks from OCR, to texture analysis, scene recognition, and so forth. Overall, NEVIS'22 poses an unprecedented challenge for current sequential learning approaches due to the scale and diversity of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-15T18:57:46Z)
• What Makes Good Contrastive Learning on Small-Scale Wearable-based Tasks? [59.51457877578138]
  We study contrastive learning on the wearable-based activity recognition task. This paper presents an open-source PyTorch library textttCL-HAR, which can serve as a practical tool for researchers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-12T06:10:15Z)
• CMW-Net: Learning a Class-Aware Sample Weighting Mapping for Robust Deep Learning [55.733193075728096]
  Modern deep neural networks can easily overfit to biased training data containing corrupted labels or class imbalance. Sample re-weighting methods are popularly used to alleviate this data bias issue. We propose a meta-model capable of adaptively learning an explicit weighting scheme directly from data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-11T13:49:51Z)
• Meta-learning One-class Classifiers with Eigenvalue Solvers for Supervised Anomaly Detection [55.888835686183995]
  We propose a neural network-based meta-learning method for supervised anomaly detection. We experimentally demonstrate that the proposed method achieves better performance than existing anomaly detection and few-shot learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-01T01:43:04Z)
• Curriculum Learning: A Survey [65.31516318260759]
  Curriculum learning strategies have been successfully employed in all areas of machine learning. We construct a taxonomy of curriculum learning approaches by hand, considering various classification criteria. We build a hierarchical tree of curriculum learning methods using an agglomerative clustering algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-25T20:08:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.