Optimizing Instruction Synthesis: Effective Exploration of Evolutionary Space with Tree Search
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10392v1
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:28:30 GMT
- Title: Optimizing Instruction Synthesis: Effective Exploration of Evolutionary Space with Tree Search
- Authors: Chenglin Li, Qianglong Chen, Zhi Li, Feng Tao, Yicheng Li, Hao Chen, Fei Yu, Yin Zhang,
- Abstract summary: We introduce IDEA-MCTS (Instruction Data Enhancement using Monte Carlo Tree Search), a scalable framework for efficiently synthesizing instructions.
With tree search and evaluation models, it can efficiently guide each instruction to evolve into a high-quality form, aiding in instruction fine-tuning.
Experimental results show that IDEA-MCTS significantly enhances the seed instruction data, raising the average evaluation scores of quality, diversity, and complexity from 2.19 to 3.81.
- Score: 25.108044778194536
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Instruction tuning is a crucial technique for aligning language models with humans' actual goals in the real world. Extensive research has highlighted the quality of instruction data is essential for the success of this alignment. However, creating high-quality data manually is labor-intensive and time-consuming, which leads researchers to explore using LLMs to synthesize data. Recent studies have focused on using a stronger LLM to iteratively enhance existing instruction data, showing promising results. Nevertheless, previous work often lacks control over the evolution direction, resulting in high uncertainty in the data synthesis process and low-quality instructions. In this paper, we introduce a general and scalable framework, IDEA-MCTS (Instruction Data Enhancement using Monte Carlo Tree Search), a scalable framework for efficiently synthesizing instructions. With tree search and evaluation models, it can efficiently guide each instruction to evolve into a high-quality form, aiding in instruction fine-tuning. Experimental results show that IDEA-MCTS significantly enhances the seed instruction data, raising the average evaluation scores of quality, diversity, and complexity from 2.19 to 3.81. Furthermore, in open-domain benchmarks, experimental results show that IDEA-MCTS improves the accuracy of real-world instruction-following skills in LLMs by an average of 5\% in low-resource settings.
Related papers
- IterSelectTune: An Iterative Training Framework for Efficient Instruction-Tuning Data Selection [28.581257601441045]
We introduce $textbfIterSelectTune$, an efficient, cost-effective iterative training policy for selecting high-quality instruction data.
By fine-tuning on approximately 20% of the source data, our method consistently outperforms models fine-tuned on the full dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T11:48:57Z) - Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmark [3.2968976262860408]
We investigate the effectiveness of generating synthetic data through large language models (LLMs)
Our experiments show that while synthetic data can effectively capture performance of various methods for simpler tasks, it falls short for more complex tasks like named entity recognition.
We propose a new metric called the bias factor, which evaluates the biases introduced when the same LLM is used to both generate benchmarking data and to perform the tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T13:20:23Z) - Enhancing and Assessing Instruction-Following with Fine-Grained Instruction Variants [28.691691883519542]
We introduce a technique that decomposes complex instructions into simpler sub-components, modifies these, and reconstructs them into new variants.
Based on DeMoRecon, we developed the FGIV dataset which contains fine-grained instruction variants of 1,773 seed instructions.
Our findings show that LLMs fine-tuned with FGIV will gain significant performance boost on both ours and commonly used instructions-following benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T08:08:11Z) - AvaTaR: Optimizing LLM Agents for Tool Usage via Contrastive Reasoning [93.96463520716759]
Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities in utilizing external tools and knowledge to boost accuracy and hallucinations.
Here, we introduce AvaTaR, a novel and automated framework that optimize an LLM agent to effectively leverage provided tools, improving performance on a given task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T04:20:02Z) - Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process.
We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals.
The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z) - EPIC: Effective Prompting for Imbalanced-Class Data Synthesis in Tabular Data Classification via Large Language Models [39.347666307218006]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable in-context learning capabilities across diverse applications.
We introduce EPIC, a novel approach that leverages balanced, grouped data samples and consistent formatting with unique variable mapping to guide LLMs in generating accurate synthetic data across all classes, even for imbalanced datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T17:49:16Z) - CodecLM: Aligning Language Models with Tailored Synthetic Data [51.59223474427153]
We introduce CodecLM, a framework for adaptively generating high-quality synthetic data for instruction-following abilities.
We first encode seed instructions into metadata, which are concise keywords generated on-the-fly to capture the target instruction distribution.
We also introduce Self-Rubrics and Contrastive Filtering during decoding to tailor data-efficient samples.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-08T21:15:36Z) - What Makes for Good Visual Instructions? Synthesizing Complex Visual
Reasoning Instructions for Visual Instruction Tuning [115.19451843294154]
Visual instruction tuning is an essential approach to improving the zero-shot generalization capability of Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs)
We propose a systematic approach to automatically creating high-quality complex visual reasoning instructions.
Our dataset consistently enhances the performance of all the compared MLLMs, e.g., improving the performance of MiniGPT-4 and BLIP-2 on MME-Cognition by 32.6% and 28.8%, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T15:36:12Z) - Dynamics of Instruction Tuning: Each Ability of Large Language Models
Has Its Own Growth Pace [21.015261553612643]
We present a dataset with over 40k instances across ten abilities and examine instruction-tuned models with 7b to 33b parameters.
Our study reveals three primary findings: (i) Despite the models' overall performance being tied to data and parameter scale, individual abilities have different sensitivities to these factors.
Human-curated data strongly outperforms synthetic data from GPT-4 in efficiency and can constantly enhance model performance with volume increases.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-30T15:37:10Z) - From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets.
Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z) - DAGA: Data Augmentation with a Generation Approach for Low-resource
Tagging Tasks [88.62288327934499]
We propose a novel augmentation method with language models trained on the linearized labeled sentences.
Our method is applicable to both supervised and semi-supervised settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-03T07:49:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.