Optimizing Instruction Synthesis: Effective Exploration of Evolutionary Space with Tree Search
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10392v1
- Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:28:30 GMT
- Title: Optimizing Instruction Synthesis: Effective Exploration of Evolutionary Space with Tree Search
- Authors: Chenglin Li, Qianglong Chen, Zhi Li, Feng Tao, Yicheng Li, Hao Chen, Fei Yu, Yin Zhang,
- Abstract summary: We introduce IDEA-MCTS (Instruction Data Enhancement using Monte Carlo Tree Search), a scalable framework for efficiently synthesizing instructions.
With tree search and evaluation models, it can efficiently guide each instruction to evolve into a high-quality form, aiding in instruction fine-tuning.
Experimental results show that IDEA-MCTS significantly enhances the seed instruction data, raising the average evaluation scores of quality, diversity, and complexity from 2.19 to 3.81.
- Score: 25.108044778194536
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: Instruction tuning is a crucial technique for aligning language models with humans' actual goals in the real world. Extensive research has highlighted the quality of instruction data is essential for the success of this alignment. However, creating high-quality data manually is labor-intensive and time-consuming, which leads researchers to explore using LLMs to synthesize data. Recent studies have focused on using a stronger LLM to iteratively enhance existing instruction data, showing promising results. Nevertheless, previous work often lacks control over the evolution direction, resulting in high uncertainty in the data synthesis process and low-quality instructions. In this paper, we introduce a general and scalable framework, IDEA-MCTS (Instruction Data Enhancement using Monte Carlo Tree Search), a scalable framework for efficiently synthesizing instructions. With tree search and evaluation models, it can efficiently guide each instruction to evolve into a high-quality form, aiding in instruction fine-tuning. Experimental results show that IDEA-MCTS significantly enhances the seed instruction data, raising the average evaluation scores of quality, diversity, and complexity from 2.19 to 3.81. Furthermore, in open-domain benchmarks, experimental results show that IDEA-MCTS improves the accuracy of real-world instruction-following skills in LLMs by an average of 5\% in low-resource settings.
Related papers
- Large Language Models and Synthetic Data for Monitoring Dataset Mentions in Research Papers [0.0]
This paper presents a machine learning framework that automates dataset mention detection across research domains.
We employ zero-shot extraction from research papers, an LLM-as-a-Judge for quality assessment, and a reasoning agent for refinement to generate a weakly supervised synthetic dataset.
At inference, a ModernBERT-based classifier efficiently filters dataset mentions, reducing computational overhead while maintaining high recall.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-14T16:16:02Z) - A Systematic Examination of Preference Learning through the Lens of Instruction-Following [83.71180850955679]
We use a novel synthetic data generation pipeline to generate 48,000 instruction unique-following prompts.
With our synthetic prompts, we use two preference dataset curation methods - rejection sampling (RS) and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS)
Experiments reveal that shared prefixes in preference pairs, as generated by MCTS, provide marginal but consistent improvements.
High-contrast preference pairs generally outperform low-contrast pairs; however, combining both often yields the best performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-18T15:38:39Z) - Star-Agents: Automatic Data Optimization with LLM Agents for Instruction Tuning [71.2981957820888]
We propose a novel Star-Agents framework, which automates the enhancement of data quality across datasets.
The framework initially generates diverse instruction data with multiple LLM agents through a bespoke sampling method.
The generated data undergo a rigorous evaluation using a dual-model method that assesses both difficulty and quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-21T02:30:53Z) - IterSelectTune: An Iterative Training Framework for Efficient Instruction-Tuning Data Selection [28.581257601441045]
We introduce $textbfIterSelectTune$, an efficient, cost-effective iterative training policy for selecting high-quality instruction data.
By fine-tuning on approximately 20% of the source data, our method consistently outperforms models fine-tuned on the full dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T11:48:57Z) - Efficacy of Synthetic Data as a Benchmark [3.2968976262860408]
We investigate the effectiveness of generating synthetic data through large language models (LLMs)
Our experiments show that while synthetic data can effectively capture performance of various methods for simpler tasks, it falls short for more complex tasks like named entity recognition.
We propose a new metric called the bias factor, which evaluates the biases introduced when the same LLM is used to both generate benchmarking data and to perform the tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-18T13:20:23Z) - Enhancing and Assessing Instruction-Following with Fine-Grained Instruction Variants [28.691691883519542]
We introduce a technique that decomposes complex instructions into simpler sub-components, modifies these, and reconstructs them into new variants.
Based on DeMoRecon, we developed the FGIV dataset which contains fine-grained instruction variants of 1,773 seed instructions.
Our findings show that LLMs fine-tuned with FGIV will gain significant performance boost on both ours and commonly used instructions-following benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T08:08:11Z) - AvaTaR: Optimizing LLM Agents for Tool Usage via Contrastive Reasoning [93.96463520716759]
Large language model (LLM) agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities in utilizing external tools and knowledge to boost accuracy and hallucinations.
Here, we introduce AvaTaR, a novel and automated framework that optimize an LLM agent to effectively leverage provided tools, improving performance on a given task.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T04:20:02Z) - Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process.
We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals.
The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z) - EPIC: Effective Prompting for Imbalanced-Class Data Synthesis in Tabular Data Classification via Large Language Models [39.347666307218006]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable in-context learning capabilities across diverse applications.
We introduce EPIC, a novel approach that leverages balanced, grouped data samples and consistent formatting with unique variable mapping to guide LLMs in generating accurate synthetic data across all classes, even for imbalanced datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T17:49:16Z) - From Quantity to Quality: Boosting LLM Performance with Self-Guided Data Selection for Instruction Tuning [52.257422715393574]
We introduce a self-guided methodology for Large Language Models (LLMs) to autonomously discern and select cherry samples from open-source datasets.
Our key innovation, the Instruction-Following Difficulty (IFD) metric, emerges as a pivotal metric to identify discrepancies between a model's expected responses and its intrinsic generation capability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-23T09:45:29Z) - DAGA: Data Augmentation with a Generation Approach for Low-resource
Tagging Tasks [88.62288327934499]
We propose a novel augmentation method with language models trained on the linearized labeled sentences.
Our method is applicable to both supervised and semi-supervised settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-03T07:49:15Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.