When to Trust Your Data: Enhancing Dyna-Style Model-Based Reinforcement Learning With Data Filter

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12160v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 01:49:03 GMT
• Title: When to Trust Your Data: Enhancing Dyna-Style Model-Based Reinforcement Learning With Data Filter
• Authors: Yansong Li, Zeyu Dong, Ertai Luo, Yu Wu, Shuo Wu, Shuo Han,
• Abstract summary: Dyna-style algorithms combine two approaches by using simulated data from an estimated environmental model to accelerate model-free training. Previous works address this issue by using model ensembles or pretraining the estimated model with data collected from the real environment. We introduce an out-of-distribution data filter that removes simulated data from the estimated model that significantly diverges from data collected in the real environment.
• Score: 7.886307329450978
• License:
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms can be divided into two classes: model-free algorithms, which are sample-inefficient, and model-based algorithms, which suffer from model bias. Dyna-style algorithms combine these two approaches by using simulated data from an estimated environmental model to accelerate model-free training. However, their efficiency is compromised when the estimated model is inaccurate. Previous works address this issue by using model ensembles or pretraining the estimated model with data collected from the real environment, increasing computational and sample complexity. To tackle this issue, we introduce an out-of-distribution (OOD) data filter that removes simulated data from the estimated model that significantly diverges from data collected in the real environment. We show theoretically that this technique enhances the quality of simulated data. With the help of the OOD data filter, the data simulated from the estimated model better mimics the data collected by interacting with the real model. This improvement is evident in the critic updates compared to using the simulated data without the OOD data filter. Our experiment integrates the data filter into the model-based policy optimization (MBPO) algorithm. The results demonstrate that our method requires fewer interactions with the real environment to achieve a higher level of optimality than MBPO, even without a model ensemble.

Related papers

• Attribute-to-Delete: Machine Unlearning via Datamodel Matching [65.13151619119782]
  Machine unlearning -- efficiently removing a small "forget set" training data on a pre-divertrained machine learning model -- has recently attracted interest. Recent research shows that machine unlearning techniques do not hold up in such a challenging setting.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T17:20:10Z)
• From Data Deluge to Data Curation: A Filtering-WoRA Paradigm for Efficient Text-based Person Search [19.070305201045954]
  In text-based person search endeavors, data generation has emerged as a prevailing practice, addressing concerns over privacy preservation and the arduous task of manual annotation. We observe that only a subset of the data in constructed datasets plays a decisive role. We introduce a new Filtering-WoRA paradigm, which contains a filtering algorithm to identify this crucial data subset and WoRA learning strategy for light fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T05:29:14Z)
• Private Synthetic Data Meets Ensemble Learning [15.425653946755025]
  When machine learning models are trained on synthetic data and then deployed on real data, there is often a performance drop. We introduce a new ensemble strategy for training downstream models, with the goal of enhancing their performance when used on real data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-15T04:24:42Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [51.8162883997512]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models. This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model. We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z)
• Learning from aggregated data with a maximum entropy model [73.63512438583375]
  We show how a new model, similar to a logistic regression, may be learned from aggregated data only by approximating the unobserved feature distribution with a maximum entropy hypothesis. We present empirical evidence on several public datasets that the model learned this way can achieve performances comparable to those of a logistic model trained with the full unaggregated data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-05T09:17:27Z)
• DeepVARwT: Deep Learning for a VAR Model with Trend [1.9862987223379664]
  We propose a new approach that employs deep learning methodology for maximum likelihood estimation of the trend and the dependence structure. A Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) network is used for this purpose. We provide a simulation study and an application to real data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T18:23:03Z)
• DEALIO: Data-Efficient Adversarial Learning for Imitation from Observation [57.358212277226315]
  In imitation learning from observation IfO, a learning agent seeks to imitate a demonstrating agent using only observations of the demonstrated behavior without access to the control signals generated by the demonstrator. Recent methods based on adversarial imitation learning have led to state-of-the-art performance on IfO problems, but they typically suffer from high sample complexity due to a reliance on data-inefficient, model-free reinforcement learning algorithms. This issue makes them impractical to deploy in real-world settings, where gathering samples can incur high costs in terms of time, energy, and risk. We propose a more data-efficient IfO algorithm
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-31T23:46:32Z)
• Model-based Policy Optimization with Unsupervised Model Adaptation [37.09948645461043]
  We investigate how to bridge the gap between real and simulated data due to inaccurate model estimation for better policy optimization. We propose a novel model-based reinforcement learning framework AMPO, which introduces unsupervised model adaptation. Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance in terms of sample efficiency on a range of continuous control benchmark tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T14:19:42Z)
• Data from Model: Extracting Data from Non-robust and Robust Models [83.60161052867534]
  This work explores the reverse process of generating data from a model, attempting to reveal the relationship between the data and the model. We repeat the process of Data to Model (DtM) and Data from Model (DfM) in sequence and explore the loss of feature mapping information. Our results show that the accuracy drop is limited even after multiple sequences of DtM and DfM, especially for robust models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T05:27:48Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.