Prompt Engineering a Schizophrenia Chatbot: Utilizing a Multi-Agent Approach for Enhanced Compliance with Prompt Instructions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12848v1
• Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2024 09:49:24 GMT
• Title: Prompt Engineering a Schizophrenia Chatbot: Utilizing a Multi-Agent Approach for Enhanced Compliance with Prompt Instructions
• Authors: Per Niklas Waaler, Musarrat Hussain, Igor Molchanov, Lars Ailo Bongo, Brita Elvevåg,
• Abstract summary: Patients with schizophrenia often present with cognitive impairments that may hinder their ability to learn about their condition. While Large Language Models (LLMs) have the potential to make topical mental health information more accessible and engaging, their black-box nature raises concerns about ethics and safety.
• Score: 0.0699049312989311
• License:
• Abstract: Patients with schizophrenia often present with cognitive impairments that may hinder their ability to learn about their condition. These individuals could benefit greatly from education platforms that leverage the adaptability of Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-4. While LLMs have the potential to make topical mental health information more accessible and engaging, their black-box nature raises concerns about ethics and safety. Prompting offers a way to produce semi-scripted chatbots with responses anchored in instructions and validated information, but prompt-engineered chatbots may drift from their intended identity as the conversation progresses. We propose a Critical Analysis Filter for achieving better control over chatbot behavior. In this system, a team of prompted LLM agents are prompt-engineered to critically analyze and refine the chatbot's response and deliver real-time feedback to the chatbot. To test this approach, we develop an informational schizophrenia chatbot and converse with it (with the filter deactivated) until it oversteps its scope. Once drift has been observed, AI-agents are used to automatically generate sample conversations in which the chatbot is being enticed to talk about out-of-bounds topics. We manually assign to each response a compliance score that quantifies the chatbot's compliance to its instructions; specifically the rules about accurately conveying sources and being transparent about limitations. Activating the Critical Analysis Filter resulted in an acceptable compliance score (>=2) in 67.0% of responses, compared to only 8.7% when the filter was deactivated. These results suggest that a self-reflection layer could enable LLMs to be used effectively and safely in mental health platforms, maintaining adaptability while reliably limiting their scope to appropriate use cases.

Related papers

• Interactive Dialogue Agents via Reinforcement Learning on Hindsight Regenerations [58.65755268815283]
  Many real dialogues are interactive, meaning an agent's utterances will influence their conversational partner, elicit information, or change their opinion. We use this fact to rewrite and augment existing suboptimal data, and train via offline reinforcement learning (RL) an agent that outperforms both prompting and learning from unaltered human demonstrations. Our results in a user study with real humans show that our approach greatly outperforms existing state-of-the-art dialogue agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T21:37:51Z)
• Self-Directed Turing Test for Large Language Models [56.64615470513102]
  The Turing test examines whether AIs can exhibit human-like behaviour in natural language conversations. Traditional Turing tests adopt a rigid dialogue format where each participant sends only one message each time. This paper proposes the Self-Directed Turing Test, which extends the original test with a burst dialogue format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-19T09:57:28Z)
• LLM Roleplay: Simulating Human-Chatbot Interaction [52.03241266241294]
  We propose a goal-oriented, persona-based method to automatically generate diverse multi-turn dialogues simulating human-chatbot interaction. Our method can simulate human-chatbot dialogues with a high indistinguishability rate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T14:49:46Z)
• Can AI Relate: Testing Large Language Model Response for Mental Health Support [23.97212082563385]
  Large language models (LLMs) are already being piloted for clinical use in hospital systems like NYU Langone, Dana-Farber and the NHS. We develop an evaluation framework for determining whether LLM response is a viable and ethical path forward for the automation of mental health treatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-20T13:42:27Z)
• Measuring and Controlling Instruction (In)Stability in Language Model Dialogs [72.38330196290119]
  System-prompting is a tool for customizing language-model chatbots, enabling them to follow a specific instruction. We propose a benchmark to test the assumption, evaluating instruction stability via self-chats. We reveal a significant instruction drift within eight rounds of conversations. We propose a lightweight method called split-softmax, which compares favorably against two strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T20:10:29Z)
• The Typing Cure: Experiences with Large Language Model Chatbots for Mental Health Support [35.61580610996628]
  People experiencing severe distress increasingly use Large Language Model (LLM) chatbots as mental health support tools. This study builds on interviews with 21 individuals from globally diverse backgrounds to analyze how users create unique support roles. We introduce the concept of therapeutic alignment, or aligning AI with therapeutic values for mental health contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-25T18:08:53Z)
• Supporting Student Decisions on Learning Recommendations: An LLM-Based Chatbot with Knowledge Graph Contextualization for Conversational Explainability and Mentoring [0.0]
  We propose an approach to utilize chatbots as mediators of the conversation and sources of limited and controlled generation of explanations. A group chat approach is developed to connect students with human mentors, either on demand or in cases that exceed the chatbots's pre-defined tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-16T17:31:35Z)
• In Generative AI we Trust: Can Chatbots Effectively Verify Political Information? [39.58317527488534]
  This article presents a comparative analysis of the ability of two large language model (LLM)-based chatbots, ChatGPT and Bing Chat, to detect veracity of political information. We use AI auditing methodology to investigate how chatbots evaluate true, false, and borderline statements on five topics: COVID-19, Russian aggression against Ukraine, the Holocaust, climate change, and LGBTQ+ related debates. The results show high performance of ChatGPT for the baseline veracity evaluation task, with 72 percent of the cases evaluated correctly on average across languages without pre-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-20T15:17:03Z)
• AutoConv: Automatically Generating Information-seeking Conversations with Large Language Models [74.10293412011455]
  We propose AutoConv for synthetic conversation generation. Specifically, we formulate the conversation generation problem as a language modeling task. We finetune an LLM with a few human conversations to capture the characteristics of the information-seeking process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-12T08:52:40Z)
• LLM-empowered Chatbots for Psychiatrist and Patient Simulation: Application and Evaluation [18.98839299694749]
  This work focuses on exploring the potential of ChatGPT in powering chatbots for psychiatrist and patient simulation. We collaborate with psychiatrists to identify objectives and iteratively develop the dialogue system to closely align with real-world scenarios. In the evaluation experiments, we recruit real psychiatrists and patients to engage in diagnostic conversations with the chatbots, collecting their ratings for assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T02:25:01Z)
• Put Chatbot into Its Interlocutor's Shoes: New Framework to Learn Chatbot Responding with Intention [55.77218465471519]
  This paper proposes an innovative framework to train chatbots to possess human-like intentions. Our framework included a guiding robot and an interlocutor model that plays the role of humans. We examined our framework using three experimental setups and evaluate the guiding robot with four different metrics to demonstrated flexibility and performance advantages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-30T15:24:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.