Breaking the Manual Annotation Bottleneck: Creating a Comprehensive Legal Case Criticality Dataset through Semi-Automated Labeling

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13460v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 11:43:16 GMT
• Title: Breaking the Manual Annotation Bottleneck: Creating a Comprehensive Legal Case Criticality Dataset through Semi-Automated Labeling
• Authors: Ronja Stern, Ken Kawamura, Matthias Stürmer, Ilias Chalkidis, Joel Niklaus,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces the Criticality Prediction dataset, a new resource for evaluating the potential influence of Swiss Supreme Court decisions on future jurisprudence. Unlike existing approaches that rely on resource-intensive manual annotations, we semi-automatically derive labels leading to a much larger dataset. We evaluate several multilingual models, including fine-tuned variants and large language models, and find that fine-tuned models consistently outperform zero-shot baselines.
• Score: 16.529070321280447
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Predicting case criticality helps legal professionals in the court system manage large volumes of case law. This paper introduces the Criticality Prediction dataset, a new resource for evaluating the potential influence of Swiss Federal Supreme Court decisions on future jurisprudence. Unlike existing approaches that rely on resource-intensive manual annotations, we semi-automatically derive labels leading to a much larger dataset than otherwise possible. Our dataset features a two-tier labeling system: (1) the LD-Label, which identifies cases published as Leading Decisions (LD), and (2) the Citation-Label, which ranks cases by their citation frequency and recency. This allows for a more nuanced evaluation of case importance. We evaluate several multilingual models, including fine-tuned variants and large language models, and find that fine-tuned models consistently outperform zero-shot baselines, demonstrating the need for task-specific adaptation. Our contributions include the introduction of this task and the release of a multilingual dataset to the research community.

Related papers

• Improving the Accuracy and Efficiency of Legal Document Tagging with Large Language Models and Instruction Prompts [0.6554326244334866]
  Legal-LLM is a novel approach that leverages the instruction-following capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through fine-tuning. We evaluate our method on two benchmark datasets, POSTURE50K and EURLEX57K, using micro-F1 and macro-F1 scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-12T18:57:04Z)
• Bi'an: A Bilingual Benchmark and Model for Hallucination Detection in Retrieval-Augmented Generation [6.549143816134529]
  We introduce bftextBi'an, a novel framework featuring a bilingual benchmark dataset and lightweight judge models.<n>The dataset supports rigorous evaluation across multiple RAG scenarios, while the judge models are fine-tuned from compact open-source LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T15:12:59Z)
• LegalSeg: Unlocking the Structure of Indian Legal Judgments Through Rhetorical Role Classification [6.549338652948716]
  We introduce LegalSeg, the largest annotated dataset for this task, comprising over 7,000 documents and 1.4 million sentences, labeled with 7 rhetorical roles. Our results demonstrate that models incorporating broader context, structural relationships, and sequential sentence information outperform those relying solely on sentence-level features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T10:07:05Z)
• DEUCE: Dual-diversity Enhancement and Uncertainty-awareness for Cold-start Active Learning [54.35107462768146]
  Cold-start active learning (CSAL) selects valuable instances from an unlabeled dataset for manual annotation. Existing CSAL methods overlook weak classes and hard representative examples, resulting in biased learning. This paper proposes a novel dual-diversity enhancing and uncertainty-aware framework for CSAL.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-01T04:00:03Z)
• CaseSumm: A Large-Scale Dataset for Long-Context Summarization from U.S. Supreme Court Opinions [25.82451110740322]
  This paper introduces CaseSumm, a novel dataset for long-context summarization in the legal domain. We collect 25.6K U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) opinions and their official summaries, known as "syllabuses" Our dataset is the largest open legal case summarization dataset, and is the first to include summaries of SCOTUS decisions dating back to 1815.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T19:00:01Z)
• JudgeRank: Leveraging Large Language Models for Reasoning-Intensive Reranking [81.88787401178378]
  We introduce JudgeRank, a novel agentic reranker that emulates human cognitive processes when assessing document relevance. We evaluate JudgeRank on the reasoning-intensive BRIGHT benchmark, demonstrating substantial performance improvements over first-stage retrieval methods. In addition, JudgeRank performs on par with fine-tuned state-of-the-art rerankers on the popular BEIR benchmark, validating its zero-shot generalization capability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-31T18:43:12Z)
• A Small Claims Court for the NLP: Judging Legal Text Classification Strategies With Small Datasets [0.0]
  This paper investigates the best strategies for optimizing the use of a small labeled dataset and large amounts of unlabeled data. We use the records of demands to a Brazilian Public Prosecutor's Office aiming to assign the descriptions in one of the subjects. The best result was obtained with Unsupervised Data Augmentation (UDA), which jointly uses BERT, data augmentation, and strategies of semi-supervised learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T18:10:05Z)
• CLERC: A Dataset for Legal Case Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Analysis Generation [44.67578050648625]
  We transform a large open-source legal corpus into a dataset supporting information retrieval (IR) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) This dataset CLERC is constructed for training and evaluating models on their ability to (1) find corresponding citations for a given piece of legal analysis and to (2) compile the text of these citations into a cogent analysis that supports a reasoning goal.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-24T23:57:57Z)
• Do We Need Language-Specific Fact-Checking Models? The Case of Chinese [15.619421104102516]
  This paper investigates the potential benefits of language-specific fact-checking models, focusing on the case of Chinese. We first demonstrate the limitations of translation-based methods and multilingual large language models, highlighting the need for language-specific systems. We propose a Chinese fact-checking system that can better retrieve evidence from a document by incorporating context information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-27T20:26:03Z)
• Sample Efficient Preference Alignment in LLMs via Active Exploration [63.84454768573154]
  We take advantage of the fact that one can often choose contexts at which to obtain human feedback to most efficiently identify a good policy.<n>We propose an active exploration algorithm to efficiently select the data and provide theoretical proof that it has a worst-case regret bound.<n>Our method outperforms the baselines with limited samples of human preferences on several language models and four real-world datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-01T00:54:02Z)
• Fine-tuning Language Models for Factuality [96.5203774943198]
  Large pre-trained language models (LLMs) have led to their widespread use, sometimes even as a replacement for traditional search engines. Yet language models are prone to making convincing but factually inaccurate claims, often referred to as 'hallucinations' In this work, we fine-tune language models to be more factual, without human labeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T18:59:15Z)
• Evaluating the Fairness of Discriminative Foundation Models in Computer Vision [51.176061115977774]
  We propose a novel taxonomy for bias evaluation of discriminative foundation models, such as Contrastive Language-Pretraining (CLIP) We then systematically evaluate existing methods for mitigating bias in these models with respect to our taxonomy. Specifically, we evaluate OpenAI's CLIP and OpenCLIP models for key applications, such as zero-shot classification, image retrieval and image captioning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T10:32:39Z)
• Are Large Language Models Robust Coreference Resolvers? [17.60248310475889]
  We show that prompting for coreference can outperform current unsupervised coreference systems. Further investigations reveal that instruction-tuned LMs generalize surprisingly well across domains, languages, and time periods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T19:38:28Z)
• Transfer-Free Data-Efficient Multilingual Slot Labeling [82.02076369811402]
  Slot labeling is a core component of task-oriented dialogue (ToD) systems. To mitigate the inherent data scarcity issue, current research on multilingual ToD assumes that sufficient English-language annotated data are always available. We propose a two-stage slot labeling approach (termed TWOSL) which transforms standard multilingual sentence encoders into effective slot labelers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T22:47:32Z)
• Retrieval-augmented Multi-label Text Classification [20.100081284294973]
  Multi-label text classification is a challenging task in settings of large label sets. Retrieval augmentation aims to improve the sample efficiency of classification models. We evaluate this approach on four datasets from the legal and biomedical domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T14:16:23Z)
• On Cross-Lingual Retrieval with Multilingual Text Encoders [51.60862829942932]
  We study the suitability of state-of-the-art multilingual encoders for cross-lingual document and sentence retrieval tasks. We benchmark their performance in unsupervised ad-hoc sentence- and document-level CLIR experiments. We evaluate multilingual encoders fine-tuned in a supervised fashion (i.e., we learn to rank) on English relevance data in a series of zero-shot language and domain transfer CLIR experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-21T08:10:27Z)
• From Good to Best: Two-Stage Training for Cross-lingual Machine Reading Comprehension [51.953428342923885]
  We develop a two-stage approach to enhance the model performance. The first stage targets at recall: we design a hard-learning (HL) algorithm to maximize the likelihood that the top-k predictions contain the accurate answer. The second stage focuses on precision: an answer-aware contrastive learning mechanism is developed to learn the fine difference between the accurate answer and other candidates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-09T07:31:15Z)
• Revisiting Self-Training for Few-Shot Learning of Language Model [61.173976954360334]
  Unlabeled data carry rich task-relevant information, they are proven useful for few-shot learning of language model. In this work, we revisit the self-training technique for language model fine-tuning and present a state-of-the-art prompt-based few-shot learner, SFLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T08:51:36Z)
• LAWDR: Language-Agnostic Weighted Document Representations from Pre-trained Models [8.745407715423992]
  Cross-lingual document representations enable language understanding in multilingual contexts. Large pre-trained language models such as BERT, XLM and XLM-RoBERTa have achieved great success when fine-tuned on sentence-level downstream tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-07T07:14:00Z)
• Multitask Learning for Class-Imbalanced Discourse Classification [74.41900374452472]
  We show that a multitask approach can improve 7% Micro F1-score upon current state-of-the-art benchmarks. We also offer a comparative review of additional techniques proposed to address resource-poor problems in NLP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-02T07:13:41Z)
• Comparison of Interactive Knowledge Base Spelling Correction Models for Low-Resource Languages [81.90356787324481]
  Spelling normalization for low resource languages is a challenging task because the patterns are hard to predict. This work shows a comparison of a neural model and character language models with varying amounts on target language data. Our usage scenario is interactive correction with nearly zero amounts of training examples, improving models as more data is collected.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T17:31:07Z)
• Summary-Source Proposition-level Alignment: Task, Datasets and Supervised Baseline [94.0601799665342]
  Aligning sentences in a reference summary with their counterparts in source documents was shown as a useful auxiliary summarization task. We propose establishing summary-source alignment as an explicit task, while introducing two major novelties. We create a novel training dataset for proposition-level alignment, derived automatically from available summarization evaluation data. We present a supervised proposition alignment baseline model, showing improved alignment-quality over the unsupervised approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-01T17:27:12Z)
• Exemplar Auditing for Multi-Label Biomedical Text Classification [0.4873362301533824]
  We generalize a recently proposed zero-shot sequence labeling method, "supervised labeling via a convolutional decomposition" The approach yields classification with "introspection", relating the fine-grained features of an inference-time prediction to their nearest neighbors. Our proposed approach yields both a competitively effective classification model and an interrogation mechanism to aid healthcare workers in understanding the salient features that drive the model's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-07T02:54:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.