Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Following

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15553v1
• Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 00:59:47 GMT
• Title: Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Following
• Authors: Yun He, Di Jin, Chaoqi Wang, Chloe Bi, Karishma Mandyam, Hejia Zhang, Chen Zhu, Ning Li, Tengyu Xu, Hongjiang Lv, Shruti Bhosale, Chenguang Zhu, Karthik Abinav Sankararaman, Eryk Helenowski, Melanie Kambadur, Aditya Tayade, Hao Ma, Han Fang, Sinong Wang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Multi-IF, a new benchmark designed to assess Large Language Models' proficiency in following multi-turn and multilingual instructions. Our evaluation of 14 state-of-the-art LLMs on Multi-IF reveals that it presents a significantly more challenging task than existing benchmarks. languages with non-Latin scripts (Hindi, Russian, and Chinese) generally exhibit higher error rates, suggesting potential limitations in the models' multilingual capabilities.
• Score: 51.18383180774354
• License:
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in various tasks, including instruction following, which is crucial for aligning model outputs with user expectations. However, evaluating LLMs' ability to follow instructions remains challenging due to the complexity and subjectivity of human language. Current benchmarks primarily focus on single-turn, monolingual instructions, which do not adequately reflect the complexities of real-world applications that require handling multi-turn and multilingual interactions. To address this gap, we introduce Multi-IF, a new benchmark designed to assess LLMs' proficiency in following multi-turn and multilingual instructions. Multi-IF, which utilizes a hybrid framework combining LLM and human annotators, expands upon the IFEval by incorporating multi-turn sequences and translating the English prompts into another 7 languages, resulting in a dataset of 4,501 multilingual conversations, where each has three turns. Our evaluation of 14 state-of-the-art LLMs on Multi-IF reveals that it presents a significantly more challenging task than existing benchmarks. All the models tested showed a higher rate of failure in executing instructions correctly with each additional turn. For example, o1-preview drops from 0.877 at the first turn to 0.707 at the third turn in terms of average accuracy over all languages. Moreover, languages with non-Latin scripts (Hindi, Russian, and Chinese) generally exhibit higher error rates, suggesting potential limitations in the models' multilingual capabilities. We release Multi-IF prompts and the evaluation code base to encourage further research in this critical area.

Related papers

• Understanding and Mitigating Language Confusion in LLMs [76.96033035093204]
  We evaluate 15 typologically diverse languages with existing and newly-created English and multilingual prompts. We find that Llama Instruct and Mistral models exhibit high degrees of language confusion. We find that language confusion can be partially mitigated via few-shot prompting, multilingual SFT and preference tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-28T17:03:51Z)
• Getting More from Less: Large Language Models are Good Spontaneous Multilingual Learners [67.85635044939836]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown impressive language capabilities. In this work, we investigate the spontaneous multilingual alignment improvement of LLMs. We find that LLMs instruction-tuned on the question translation data (i.e. without annotated answers) are able to encourage the alignment between English and a wide range of languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T16:46:19Z)
• Investigating Multilingual Instruction-Tuning: Do Polyglot Models Demand for Multilingual Instructions? [42.37657013017192]
  We show that instruction-tuning on parallel instead of monolingual corpora benefits cross-lingual instruction following capabilities by up to 9.9%. We also conduct a human annotation study to understand the alignment between human-based and GPT-4-based evaluation within multilingual chat scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T11:07:07Z)
• On the Performance of Multimodal Language Models [4.677125897916577]
  This study conducts a comparative analysis of different multimodal instruction tuning approaches. We reveal key insights for guiding architectural choices when incorporating multimodal capabilities into large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T23:33:36Z)
• PolyLM: An Open Source Polyglot Large Language Model [57.64420154135178]
  We present PolyLM, a multilingual large language model (LLMs) trained on 640 billion (B) tokens, avaliable in two model sizes: 1.7B and 13B. To enhance its multilingual capabilities, we 1) integrate bilingual data into training data; and 2) adopt a curriculum learning strategy that increases the proportion of non-English data from 30% in the first stage to 60% in the final stage during pre-training. Further, we propose a multilingual self-instruct method which automatically generates 132.7K diverse multilingual instructions for model fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-12T09:00:37Z)
• XSemPLR: Cross-Lingual Semantic Parsing in Multiple Natural Languages and Meaning Representations [25.50509874992198]
  Cross-Lingual Semantic Parsing aims to translate queries in multiple natural languages into meaning representations. Existing CLSP models are separately proposed and evaluated on datasets of limited tasks and applications. We present XSemPLR, a unified benchmark for cross-lingual semantic parsing featured with 22 natural languages and 8 meaning representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T01:09:37Z)
• Not All Languages Are Created Equal in LLMs: Improving Multilingual Capability by Cross-Lingual-Thought Prompting [123.16452714740106]
  Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive multilingual capability, but their performance varies substantially across different languages. We introduce a simple yet effective method, called cross-lingual-thought prompting (XLT) XLT is a generic template prompt that stimulates cross-lingual and logical reasoning skills to enhance task performance across languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-11T17:44:17Z)
• CoSDA-ML: Multi-Lingual Code-Switching Data Augmentation for Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual NLP [68.2650714613869]
  We propose a data augmentation framework to generate multi-lingual code-switching data to fine-tune mBERT. Compared with the existing work, our method does not rely on bilingual sentences for training, and requires only one training process for multiple target languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T13:15:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.