Collapse or Thrive? Perils and Promises of Synthetic Data in a Self-Generating World

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.16713v3
• Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2025 00:43:54 GMT
• Title: Collapse or Thrive? Perils and Promises of Synthetic Data in a Self-Generating World
• Authors: Joshua Kazdan, Rylan Schaeffer, Apratim Dey, Matthias Gerstgrasser, Rafael Rafailov, David L. Donoho, Sanmi Koyejo,
• Abstract summary: generative machine learning models are pretrained on web-scale datasets containing data generated by earlier models. Some prior work warns of "model collapse" as the web is overwhelmed by synthetic data. We report experiments on three ways of using data (training-workflows) across three generative model task-settings.
• Score: 19.266191284270793
• License:
• Abstract: What happens when generative machine learning models are pretrained on web-scale datasets containing data generated by earlier models? Some prior work warns of "model collapse" as the web is overwhelmed by synthetic data; other work suggests the problem can be contained (i.e. collapse can be avoided) by managing how available data are used in pretraining. In this paper, we report experiments on three ways of using data (training-workflows), across three generative model task-settings (multivariate Gaussian estimation, kernel density estimation, and language-model fine-tuning) to further confirm the possibility of containment: (a) we confirm that the training-workflow of {\it replacing} all real data by successive generations of purely synthetic data indeed suffers model collapse in all task-settings studied; (b) we consider the training-workflow of {\it accumulating} synthetic data alongside real data and training on all data combined and confirming that, although the proportion of real data eventually becomes zero, models remain stable and their test losses do not diverge under this training-workflow; (c) we consider a training-workflow where real and synthetic data accumulate together but successive generations of pretraining are constrained to use fixed-size data subsets each generation. In this workflow, we observe slow and gradual rather than explosive degradation of test loss performance across generations. Our insights are particularly important when forecasting whether future frontier generative models will collapse or thrive, and our results open avenues for empirically and mathematically studying the context-dependent value of synthetic data.

Related papers

• How to Synthesize Text Data without Model Collapse? [37.219627817995054]
  Model collapse in synthetic data indicates that iterative training on self-generated data leads to a gradual decline in performance. We propose token editing on human-produced data to obtain semi-synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T09:43:39Z)
• Universality of the $π^2/6$ Pathway in Avoiding Model Collapse [0.0]
  We demonstrate the universality of the pi-squared-over-6 augment risk bound across a large family of canonical statistical models. We provide a framework that is able to accommodate a large variety of augment processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T08:44:10Z)
• Self-Consuming Generative Models with Curated Data Provably Optimize Human Preferences [20.629333587044012]
  We study the impact of data curation on iterated retraining of generative models. We prove that, if the data is curated according to a reward model, the expected reward of the iterative retraining procedure is maximized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T21:28:28Z)
• Beyond Model Collapse: Scaling Up with Synthesized Data Requires Verification [11.6055501181235]
  We investigate the use of verification on synthesized data to prevent model collapse. We show that verifiers, even imperfect ones, can indeed be harnessed to prevent model collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T17:46:16Z)
• Heat Death of Generative Models in Closed-Loop Learning [63.83608300361159]
  We study the learning dynamics of generative models that are fed back their own produced content in addition to their original training dataset. We show that, unless a sufficient amount of external data is introduced at each iteration, any non-trivial temperature leads the model to degenerate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T21:51:39Z)
• Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Data [49.73114504515852]
  We show that replacing the original real data by each generation's synthetic data does indeed tend towards model collapse. We demonstrate that accumulating the successive generations of synthetic data alongside the original real data avoids model collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T18:31:24Z)
• Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models [56.84592466204185]
  This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop. We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models. We present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T02:08:09Z)
• Learning Defect Prediction from Unrealistic Data [57.53586547895278]
  Pretrained models of code have become popular choices for code understanding and generation tasks. Such models tend to be large and require commensurate volumes of training data. It has become popular to train models with far larger but less realistic datasets, such as functions with artificially injected bugs. Models trained on such data tend to only perform well on similar data, while underperforming on real world programs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-02T01:51:43Z)
• On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Data [56.153542044045224]
  We study the impact of training generative models on mixed datasets. We first prove the stability of iterative training under the condition that the initial generative models approximate the data distribution well enough. We empirically validate our theory on both synthetic and natural images by iteratively training normalizing flows and state-of-the-art diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T16:41:04Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• STAN: Synthetic Network Traffic Generation with Generative Neural Models [10.54843182184416]
  This paper presents STAN (Synthetic network Traffic generation with Autoregressive Neural models), a tool to generate realistic synthetic network traffic datasets. Our novel neural architecture captures both temporal dependencies and dependence between attributes at any given time. We evaluate the performance of STAN in terms of the quality of data generated, by training it on both a simulated dataset and a real network traffic data set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-27T04:20:02Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.