Towards Better Open-Ended Text Generation: A Multicriteria Evaluation Framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.18653v1
• Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 11:32:01 GMT
• Title: Towards Better Open-Ended Text Generation: A Multicriteria Evaluation Framework
• Authors: Esteban Garces Arias, Hannah Blocher, Julian Rodemann, Meimingwei Li, Christian Heumann, Matthias Aßenmacher,
• Abstract summary: Open-ended text generation has become a prominent task in natural language processing. Decoding methods often excel in some metrics while underperforming in others. We present novel ranking strategies within this multicriteria framework.
• Score: 0.1979158763744267
• License:
• Abstract: Open-ended text generation has become a prominent task in natural language processing due to the rise of powerful (large) language models. However, evaluating the quality of these models and the employed decoding strategies remains challenging because of trade-offs among widely used metrics such as coherence, diversity, and perplexity. Decoding methods often excel in some metrics while underperforming in others, complicating the establishment of a clear ranking. In this paper, we present novel ranking strategies within this multicriteria framework. Specifically, we employ benchmarking approaches based on partial orderings and present a new summary metric designed to balance existing automatic indicators, providing a more holistic evaluation of text generation quality. Furthermore, we discuss the alignment of these approaches with human judgments. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed methods offer a robust way to compare decoding strategies, exhibit similarities with human preferences, and serve as valuable tools in guiding model selection for open-ended text generation tasks. Finally, we suggest future directions for improving evaluation methodologies in text generation. Our codebase, datasets, and models are publicly available.

Related papers

• Adaptive Contrastive Search: Uncertainty-Guided Decoding for Open-Ended Text Generation [0.20971479389679337]
  We introduce adaptive contrastive search, a novel decoding strategy extending contrastive search. Our findings indicate performance enhancement in both aspects, across different model architectures and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T12:23:54Z)
• Retrieval is Accurate Generation [99.24267226311157]
  We introduce a novel method that selects context-aware phrases from a collection of supporting documents. Our model achieves the best performance and the lowest latency among several retrieval-augmented baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T14:16:19Z)
• ToBlend: Token-Level Blending With an Ensemble of LLMs to Attack AI-Generated Text Detection [6.27025292177391]
  ToBlend is a novel token-level ensemble text generation method to challenge the robustness of current AI-content detection approaches. We find ToBlend significantly drops the performance of most mainstream AI-content detection methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-17T02:25:57Z)
• Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs [82.21278402856079]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textscLlama-2 and textscMistral. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:53:26Z)
• Language Model Decoding as Direct Metrics Optimization [87.68281625776282]
  Current decoding methods struggle to generate texts that align with human texts across different aspects. In this work, we frame decoding from a language model as an optimization problem with the goal of strictly matching the expected performance with human texts. We prove that this induced distribution is guaranteed to improve the perplexity on human texts, which suggests a better approximation to the underlying distribution of human texts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T09:35:27Z)
• Large Language Models are Diverse Role-Players for Summarization Evaluation [82.31575622685902]
  A document summary's quality can be assessed by human annotators on various criteria, both objective ones like grammar and correctness, and subjective ones like informativeness, succinctness, and appeal. Most of the automatic evaluation methods like BLUE/ROUGE may be not able to adequately capture the above dimensions. We propose a new evaluation framework based on LLMs, which provides a comprehensive evaluation framework by comparing generated text and reference text from both objective and subjective aspects.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-27T10:40:59Z)
• Language Model Evaluation in Open-ended Text Generation [0.76146285961466]
  We study different evaluation metrics that have been proposed to evaluate quality, diversity and consistency of machine-generated text. From there, we propose a practical pipeline to evaluate language models in open-ended generation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-08T06:16:02Z)
• Data-to-text Generation with Macro Planning [61.265321323312286]
  We propose a neural model with a macro planning stage followed by a generation stage reminiscent of traditional methods. Our approach outperforms competitive baselines in terms of automatic and human evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-04T16:32:57Z)
• Hierarchical Bi-Directional Self-Attention Networks for Paper Review Rating Recommendation [81.55533657694016]
  We propose a Hierarchical bi-directional self-attention Network framework (HabNet) for paper review rating prediction and recommendation. Specifically, we leverage the hierarchical structure of the paper reviews with three levels of encoders: sentence encoder (level one), intra-review encoder (level two) and inter-review encoder (level three) We are able to identify useful predictors to make the final acceptance decision, as well as to help discover the inconsistency between numerical review ratings and text sentiment conveyed by reviewers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T08:07:50Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.