Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents for Strategic Production Policies in Microeconomic Market Simulations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.20550v1
- Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 18:38:05 GMT
- Title: Deep Reinforcement Learning Agents for Strategic Production Policies in Microeconomic Market Simulations
- Authors: Eduardo C. Garrido-Merchán, Maria Coronado-Vaca, Álvaro López-López, Carlos Martinez de Ibarreta,
- Abstract summary: We propose a DRL-based approach to obtain an effective policy in competitive markets with multiple producers.
Our framework enables agents to learn adaptive production policies to several simulations that consistently outperform static and random strategies.
The results show that agents trained with DRL can strategically adjust production levels to maximize long-term profitability.
- Score: 1.6499388997661122
- License:
- Abstract: Traditional economic models often rely on fixed assumptions about market dynamics, limiting their ability to capture the complexities and stochastic nature of real-world scenarios. However, reality is more complex and includes noise, making traditional models assumptions not met in the market. In this paper, we explore the application of deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to obtain optimal production strategies in microeconomic market environments to overcome the limitations of traditional models. Concretely, we propose a DRL-based approach to obtain an effective policy in competitive markets with multiple producers, each optimizing their production decisions in response to fluctuating demand, supply, prices, subsidies, fixed costs, total production curve, elasticities and other effects contaminated by noise. Our framework enables agents to learn adaptive production policies to several simulations that consistently outperform static and random strategies. As the deep neural networks used by the agents are universal approximators of functions, DRL algorithms can represent in the network complex patterns of data learnt by trial and error that explain the market. Through extensive simulations, we demonstrate how DRL can capture the intricate interplay between production costs, market prices, and competitor behavior, providing insights into optimal decision-making in dynamic economic settings. The results show that agents trained with DRL can strategically adjust production levels to maximize long-term profitability, even in the face of volatile market conditions. We believe that the study bridges the gap between theoretical economic modeling and practical market simulation, illustrating the potential of DRL to revolutionize decision-making in market strategies.
Related papers
- An Experimental Study of Competitive Market Behavior Through LLMs [0.0]
This study explores the potential of large language models (LLMs) to conduct market experiments.
We model the behavior of market agents in a controlled experimental setting, assessing their ability to converge toward competitive equilibria.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-12T18:50:13Z) - By Fair Means or Foul: Quantifying Collusion in a Market Simulation with Deep Reinforcement Learning [1.5249435285717095]
This research employs an experimental oligopoly model of repeated price competition.
We investigate the strategies and emerging pricing patterns developed by the agents, which may lead to a collusive outcome.
Our findings indicate that RL-based AI agents converge to a collusive state characterized by the charging of supracompetitive prices.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T15:35:08Z) - Simulating the Economic Impact of Rationality through Reinforcement Learning and Agent-Based Modelling [1.7546137756031712]
We leverage multi-agent reinforcement learning (RL) to expand the capabilities of agent-based models (ABMs)
We show that RL agents spontaneously learn three distinct strategies for maximising profits, with the optimal strategy depending on the level of market competition and rationality.
We also find that RL agents with independent policies, and without the ability to communicate with each other, spontaneously learn to segregate into different strategic groups, thus increasing market power and overall profits.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-03T15:08:25Z) - Harnessing Deep Q-Learning for Enhanced Statistical Arbitrage in
High-Frequency Trading: A Comprehensive Exploration [0.0]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a branch of machine learning where agents learn by interacting with their environment.
This paper dives deep into the integration of RL in statistical arbitrage strategies tailored for High-Frequency Trading (HFT) scenarios.
Through extensive simulations and backtests, our research reveals that RL not only enhances the adaptability of trading strategies but also shows promise in improving profitability metrics and risk-adjusted returns.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-13T06:15:40Z) - Finding Regularized Competitive Equilibria of Heterogeneous Agent
Macroeconomic Models with Reinforcement Learning [151.03738099494765]
We study a heterogeneous agent macroeconomic model with an infinite number of households and firms competing in a labor market.
We propose a data-driven reinforcement learning framework that finds the regularized competitive equilibrium of the model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-24T17:16:27Z) - Latent Variable Representation for Reinforcement Learning [131.03944557979725]
It remains unclear theoretically and empirically how latent variable models may facilitate learning, planning, and exploration to improve the sample efficiency of model-based reinforcement learning.
We provide a representation view of the latent variable models for state-action value functions, which allows both tractable variational learning algorithm and effective implementation of the optimism/pessimism principle.
In particular, we propose a computationally efficient planning algorithm with UCB exploration by incorporating kernel embeddings of latent variable models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-17T00:26:31Z) - Efficient Model-based Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning via Optimistic
Equilibrium Computation [93.52573037053449]
H-MARL (Hallucinated Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning) learns successful equilibrium policies after a few interactions with the environment.
We demonstrate our approach experimentally on an autonomous driving simulation benchmark.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-03-14T17:24:03Z) - Finding General Equilibria in Many-Agent Economic Simulations Using Deep
Reinforcement Learning [72.23843557783533]
We show that deep reinforcement learning can discover stable solutions that are epsilon-Nash equilibria for a meta-game over agent types.
Our approach is more flexible and does not need unrealistic assumptions, e.g., market clearing.
We demonstrate our approach in real-business-cycle models, a representative family of DGE models, with 100 worker-consumers, 10 firms, and a government who taxes and redistributes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-03T17:00:17Z) - Deep Q-Learning Market Makers in a Multi-Agent Simulated Stock Market [58.720142291102135]
This paper focuses precisely on the study of these markets makers strategies from an agent-based perspective.
We propose the application of Reinforcement Learning (RL) for the creation of intelligent market markers in simulated stock markets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-08T14:55:21Z) - Towards Realistic Market Simulations: a Generative Adversarial Networks
Approach [2.381990157809543]
We propose a synthetic market generator based on Conditional Generative Adversarial Networks (CGANs) trained on real aggregate-level historical data.
A CGAN-based "world" agent can generate meaningful orders in response to an experimental agent.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-25T22:01:07Z) - Building a Foundation for Data-Driven, Interpretable, and Robust Policy
Design using the AI Economist [67.08543240320756]
We show that the AI Economist framework enables effective, flexible, and interpretable policy design using two-level reinforcement learning and data-driven simulations.
We find that log-linear policies trained using RL significantly improve social welfare, based on both public health and economic outcomes, compared to past outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-06T01:30:41Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.