Directional anomaly detection

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23158v1
• Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:11:40 GMT
• Title: Directional anomaly detection
• Authors: Oliver Urs Lenz, Matthijs van Leeuwen,
• Abstract summary: Semi-supervised anomaly detection is based on the principle that potential anomalies are those records that look different from normal training data. We present two asymmetrical distance measures that take this directionality into account: ramp distance and signed distance.
• Score: 4.174296652683762
• License:
• Abstract: Semi-supervised anomaly detection is based on the principle that potential anomalies are those records that look different from normal training data. However, in some cases we are specifically interested in anomalies that correspond to high attribute values (or low, but not both). We present two asymmetrical distance measures that take this directionality into account: ramp distance and signed distance. Through experiments on synthetic and real-life datasets we show that ramp distance performs as well or better than the absolute distance traditionally used in anomaly detection. While signed distance also performs well on synthetic data, it performs substantially poorer on real-life datasets. We argue that this reflects the fact that in practice, good scores on some attributes should not be allowed to compensate for bad scores on others.

Related papers

• Deep Positive-Unlabeled Anomaly Detection for Contaminated Unlabeled Data [31.029029510114448]
  Existing semi-supervised approaches assume that unlabeled data are mostly normal. We propose the positive-unlabeled autoencoder, which is based on positive-unlabeled learning and the anomaly detector such as the autoencoder. Our approach achieves better detection performance than existing approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T09:34:47Z)
• Anomaly Detection by Context Contrasting [57.695202846009714]
  Anomaly detection focuses on identifying samples that deviate from the norm. Recent advances in self-supervised learning have shown great promise in this regard. We propose Con$$, which learns through context augmentations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T07:59:06Z)
• An Outlier Exposure Approach to Improve Visual Anomaly Detection Performance for Mobile Robots [76.36017224414523]
  We consider the problem of building visual anomaly detection systems for mobile robots. Standard anomaly detection models are trained using large datasets composed only of non-anomalous data. We tackle the problem of exploiting these data to improve the performance of a Real-NVP anomaly detection model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-20T15:18:13Z)
• Latent Outlier Exposure for Anomaly Detection with Contaminated Data [31.446666264334528]
  Anomaly detection aims at identifying data points that show systematic deviations from the majority of data in an unlabeled dataset. We propose a strategy for training an anomaly detector in the presence of unlabeled anomalies that is compatible with a broad class of models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-16T14:21:28Z)
• Explainable Deep Few-shot Anomaly Detection with Deviation Networks [123.46611927225963]
  We introduce a novel weakly-supervised anomaly detection framework to train detection models. The proposed approach learns discriminative normality by leveraging the labeled anomalies and a prior probability. Our model is substantially more sample-efficient and robust, and performs significantly better than state-of-the-art competing methods in both closed-set and open-set settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-01T14:33:17Z)
• On the relation between statistical learning and perceptual distances [61.25815733012866]
  We show that perceptual sensitivity is correlated with the probability of an image in its close neighborhood. We also explore the relation between distances induced by autoencoders and the probability distribution of the data used for training them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-08T14:56:56Z)
• Understanding the Effect of Bias in Deep Anomaly Detection [15.83398707988473]
  Anomaly detection presents a unique challenge in machine learning, due to the scarcity of labeled anomaly data. Recent work attempts to mitigate such problems by augmenting training of deep anomaly detection models with additional labeled anomaly samples. In this paper, we aim to understand the effect of a biased anomaly set on anomaly detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-16T03:55:02Z)
• Toward Deep Supervised Anomaly Detection: Reinforcement Learning from Partially Labeled Anomaly Data [150.9270911031327]
  We consider the problem of anomaly detection with a small set of partially labeled anomaly examples and a large-scale unlabeled dataset. Existing related methods either exclusively fit the limited anomaly examples that typically do not span the entire set of anomalies, or proceed with unsupervised learning from the unlabeled data. We propose here instead a deep reinforcement learning-based approach that enables an end-to-end optimization of the detection of both labeled and unlabeled anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-15T03:05:39Z)
• Deep Weakly-supervised Anomaly Detection [118.55172352231381]
  Pairwise Relation prediction Network (PReNet) learns pairwise relation features and anomaly scores. PReNet can detect any seen/unseen abnormalities that fit the learned pairwise abnormal patterns. Empirical results on 12 real-world datasets show that PReNet significantly outperforms nine competing methods in detecting seen and unseen anomalies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-10-30T00:40:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.