Auditing Google's Search Algorithm: Measuring News Diversity Across Brazil, the UK, and the US

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23842v1
• Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 11:49:16 GMT
• Title: Auditing Google's Search Algorithm: Measuring News Diversity Across Brazil, the UK, and the US
• Authors: Raphael Hernandes, Giulio Corsi,
• Abstract summary: This study examines the influence of Google's search algorithm on news diversity by analyzing search results in Brazil, the UK, and the US. It explores how Google's system preferentially favors a limited number of news outlets. Findings indicate a slight leftward bias in search outcomes and a preference for popular, often national outlets.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: This study examines the influence of Google's search algorithm on news diversity by analyzing search results in Brazil, the UK, and the US. It explores how Google's system preferentially favors a limited number of news outlets. Utilizing algorithm auditing techniques, the research measures source concentration with the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) and Gini coefficient, revealing significant concentration trends. The study underscores the importance of conducting horizontal analyses across multiple search queries, as focusing solely on individual results pages may obscure these patterns. Factors such as popularity, political bias, and recency were evaluated for their impact on news rankings. Findings indicate a slight leftward bias in search outcomes and a preference for popular, often national outlets. This bias, combined with a tendency to prioritize recent content, suggests that Google's algorithm may reinforce existing media inequalities. By analyzing the largest dataset to date -- 221,863 search results -- this research provides comprehensive, longitudinal insights into how algorithms shape public access to diverse news sources.

Related papers

• Algorithmic Misjudgement in Google Search Results: Evidence from Auditing the US Online Electoral Information Environment [0.0]
  We study the extent to which government-maintained web domains are represented in the online electoral information environment. We find that 71% of all occurrences of state, county, and local government sources were mistargeted. We argue that ensuring the correct targeting of these sources to their respective constituents is a critical part of Google's role in facilitating access to authoritative and locally-relevant electoral information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T17:09:04Z)
• Fairness in Image Search: A Study of Occupational Stereotyping in Image Retrieval and its Debiasing [0.0]
  We present our study on bias and fairness in web search, with a focus on keyword-based image search. We first discuss several kinds of biases that exist in search systems and why it is important to mitigate them. We examine the extent of gender bias in top-tanked image search results obtained for several occupational keywords.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-06T00:24:44Z)
• Bias or Diversity? Unraveling Fine-Grained Thematic Discrepancy in U.S. News Headlines [63.52264764099532]
  We use a large dataset of 1.8 million news headlines from major U.S. media outlets spanning from 2014 to 2022. We quantify the fine-grained thematic discrepancy related to four prominent topics - domestic politics, economic issues, social issues, and foreign affairs. Our findings indicate that on domestic politics and social issues, the discrepancy can be attributed to a certain degree of media bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-28T03:31:37Z)
• Diversity matters: Robustness of bias measurements in Wikidata [4.950095974653716]
  We reveal data biases that surface in Wikidata for thirteen different demographics selected from seven continents. We conduct our extensive experiments on a large number of occupations sampled from the thirteen demographics with respect to the sensitive attribute, i.e., gender. We show that the choice of the state-of-the-art KG embedding algorithm has a strong impact on the ranking of biased occupations irrespective of gender.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-27T18:38:10Z)
• Unveiling the Hidden Agenda: Biases in News Reporting and Consumption [59.55900146668931]
  We build a six-year dataset on the Italian vaccine debate and adopt a Bayesian latent space model to identify narrative and selection biases. We found a nonlinear relationship between biases and engagement, with higher engagement for extreme positions. Analysis of news consumption on Twitter reveals common audiences among news outlets with similar ideological positions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-14T18:58:42Z)
• Novelty in news search: a longitudinal study of the 2020 US elections [62.997667081978825]
  We analyze novelty, a measurement of new items that emerge in the top news search results. We find more new items emerging for election related queries compared to topical or stable queries. We argue that such imbalances affect the visibility of political candidates in news searches during electoral periods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-09T08:42:37Z)
• Square One Bias in NLP: Towards a Multi-Dimensional Exploration of the Research Manifold [88.83876819883653]
  We show through a manual classification of recent NLP research papers that this is indeed the case. We observe that NLP research often goes beyond the square one setup, focusing not only on accuracy, but also on fairness or interpretability, but typically only along a single dimension.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-20T13:04:23Z)
• Search engine effects on news consumption: ranking and representativeness outweigh familiarity in news selection [0.0]
  We analyze three competing factors, two algorithmic (ranking and representativeness) and one psychological (familiarity) that could influence the selection of news articles that appear in search results. Our results demonstrate the steering power of the algorithmic factors on news consumption as compared to familiarity. We confirm that Google Search drives individuals to unfamiliar sources and find that it increases the diversity of the political audience to news sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-17T06:30:56Z)
• The Matter of Chance: Auditing Web Search Results Related to the 2020 U.S. Presidential Primary Elections Across Six Search Engines [68.8204255655161]
  We look at the text search results for "us elections", "donald trump", "joe biden" and "bernie sanders" queries on Google, Baidu, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Yahoo, and Yandex. Our findings indicate substantial differences in the search results between search engines and multiple discrepancies within the results generated for different agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-03T11:18:19Z)
• Towards causal benchmarking of bias in face analysis algorithms [54.19499274513654]
  We develop an experimental method for measuring algorithmic bias of face analysis algorithms. Our proposed method is based on generating synthetic transects'' of matched sample images. We validate our method by comparing it to a study that employs the traditional observational method for analyzing bias in gender classification algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-13T17:10:34Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.