Graph-DPEP: Decomposed Plug and Ensemble Play for Few-Shot Document Relation Extraction with Graph-of-Thoughts Reasoning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02864v1
• Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 07:12:36 GMT
• Title: Graph-DPEP: Decomposed Plug and Ensemble Play for Few-Shot Document Relation Extraction with Graph-of-Thoughts Reasoning
• Authors: Tao Zhang, Ning Yan, Masood Mortazavi, Hoang H. Nguyen, Zhongfen Deng, Philip S. Yu,
• Abstract summary: Graph-DPEP framework is grounded in the reasoning behind triplet explanation thoughts presented in natural language. We develop "ensemble-play", reapplying generation on the entire type list by leveraging the reasoning thoughts embedded in a sub-graph.
• Score: 34.85741925091139
• License:
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) pre-trained on massive corpora have demonstrated impressive few-shot learning capability on many NLP tasks. Recasting an NLP task into a text-to-text generation task is a common practice so that generative LLMs can be prompted to resolve it. However, performing document-level relation extraction (DocRE) tasks with generative LLM models is still challenging due to the structured output format of DocRE, which complicates the conversion to plain text. Limited information available in few-shot samples and prompt instructions induce further difficulties and challenges in relation extraction for mentioned entities in a document. In this paper, we represent the structured output as a graph-style triplet rather than natural language expressions and leverage generative LLMs for the DocRE task. Our approach, the Graph-DPEP framework is grounded in the reasoning behind triplet explanation thoughts presented in natural language. In this framework, we first introduce a ``decomposed-plug" method for performing the generation from LLMs over prompts with type-space decomposition to alleviate the burden of distinguishing all relation types. Second, we employ a verifier for calibrating the generation and identifying overlooked query entity pairs. Third, we develop "ensemble-play", reapplying generation on the entire type list by leveraging the reasoning thoughts embedded in a sub-graph associated with the missing query pair to address the missingness issue. Through extensive comparisons with existing prompt techniques and alternative Language Models (LLMs), our framework demonstrates superior performance on publicly available benchmarks in experiments.

Related papers

• Less is More: Making Smaller Language Models Competent Subgraph Retrievers for Multi-hop KGQA [51.3033125256716]
  We model the subgraph retrieval task as a conditional generation task handled by small language models. Our base generative subgraph retrieval model, consisting of only 220M parameters, competitive retrieval performance compared to state-of-the-art models. Our largest 3B model, when plugged with an LLM reader, sets new SOTA end-to-end performance on both the WebQSP and CWQ benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T15:22:36Z)
• Systematic Task Exploration with LLMs: A Study in Citation Text Generation [63.50597360948099]
  Large language models (LLMs) bring unprecedented flexibility in defining and executing complex, creative natural language generation (NLG) tasks. We propose a three-component research framework that consists of systematic input manipulation, reference data, and output measurement. We use this framework to explore citation text generation -- a popular scholarly NLP task that lacks consensus on the task definition and evaluation metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T16:41:08Z)
• XPrompt:Explaining Large Language Model's Generation via Joint Prompt Attribution [26.639271355209104]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive performances in complex text generation tasks. The contribution of the input prompt to the generated content still remains obscure to humans. We introduce a counterfactual explanation framework based on joint prompt attribution, XPrompt.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T18:16:41Z)
• Peering into the Mind of Language Models: An Approach for Attribution in Contextual Question Answering [9.86691461253151]
  We introduce a novel method for attribution in contextual question answering, leveraging the hidden state representations of large language models (LLMs) Our approach bypasses the need for extensive model retraining and retrieval model overhead, offering granular attributions and preserving the quality of generated answers. We present Verifiability-granular, an attribution dataset which has token level annotations for LLM generations in the contextual question answering setup.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-28T09:12:44Z)
• Meta-Task Prompting Elicits Embeddings from Large Language Models [54.757445048329735]
  We introduce a new unsupervised text embedding method, Meta-Task Prompting with Explicit One-Word Limitation. We generate high-quality sentence embeddings from Large Language Models without the need for model fine-tuning. Our findings suggest a new scaling law, offering a versatile and resource-efficient approach for embedding generation across diverse scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-28T16:35:52Z)
• Learning to Reduce: Optimal Representations of Structured Data in Prompting Large Language Models [42.16047343029512]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely used as general-purpose AI agents. We propose a framework, Learning to Reduce, that fine-tunes a language model to generate a reduced version of an input context. We show that our model achieves comparable accuracies in selecting the relevant evidence from an input context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T00:41:23Z)
• Semi-automatic Data Enhancement for Document-Level Relation Extraction with Distant Supervision from Large Language Models [26.523153535336725]
  Document-level Relation Extraction (DocRE) aims to extract relations from a long context. We propose a method integrating a large language model (LLM) and a natural language inference (NLI) module to generate relation triples. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach by introducing an enhanced dataset known as DocGNRE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-13T13:10:44Z)
• Revisiting Large Language Models as Zero-shot Relation Extractors [8.953462875381888]
  Relation extraction (RE) consistently involves a certain degree of labeled or unlabeled data even if under zero-shot setting. Recent studies have shown that large language models (LLMs) transfer well to new tasks out-of-the-box simply given a natural language prompt. This work focuses on the study of exploring LLMs as zero-shot relation extractors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T06:17:39Z)
• ICL-D3IE: In-Context Learning with Diverse Demonstrations Updating for Document Information Extraction [56.790794611002106]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable results in various natural language processing (NLP) tasks with in-context learning. We propose a simple but effective in-context learning framework called ICL-D3IE. Specifically, we extract the most difficult and distinct segments from hard training documents as hard demonstrations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T06:24:50Z)
• Recitation-Augmented Language Models [85.30591349383849]
  We show that RECITE is a powerful paradigm for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. Specifically, we show that by utilizing recitation as the intermediate step, a recite-and-answer scheme can achieve new state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-04T00:49:20Z)
• POINTER: Constrained Progressive Text Generation via Insertion-based Generative Pre-training [93.79766670391618]
  We present POINTER, a novel insertion-based approach for hard-constrained text generation. The proposed method operates by progressively inserting new tokens between existing tokens in a parallel manner. The resulting coarse-to-fine hierarchy makes the generation process intuitive and interpretable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-01T18:11:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.