Alpha and Prejudice: Improving $α$-sized Worst-case Fairness via Intrinsic Reweighting

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03068v1
• Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2024 13:04:05 GMT
• Title: Alpha and Prejudice: Improving $α$-sized Worst-case Fairness via Intrinsic Reweighting
• Authors: Jing Li, Yinghua Yao, Yuangang Pan, Xuanqian Wang, Ivor W. Tsang, Xiuju Fu,
• Abstract summary: Worst-case fairness with off-the-shelf demographics group achieves parity by maximizing the model utility of the worst-off group. Recent advances have reframed this learning problem by introducing the lower bound of minimal partition ratio.
• Score: 34.954141077528334
• License:
• Abstract: Worst-case fairness with off-the-shelf demographics achieves group parity by maximizing the model utility of the worst-off group. Nevertheless, demographic information is often unavailable in practical scenarios, which impedes the use of such a direct max-min formulation. Recent advances have reframed this learning problem by introducing the lower bound of minimal partition ratio, denoted as $\alpha$, as side information, referred to as ``$\alpha$-sized worst-case fairness'' in this paper. We first justify the practical significance of this setting by presenting noteworthy evidence from the data privacy perspective, which has been overlooked by existing research. Without imposing specific requirements on loss functions, we propose reweighting the training samples based on their intrinsic importance to fairness. Given the global nature of the worst-case formulation, we further develop a stochastic learning scheme to simplify the training process without compromising model performance. Additionally, we address the issue of outliers and provide a robust variant to handle potential outliers during model training. Our theoretical analysis and experimental observations reveal the connections between the proposed approaches and existing ``fairness-through-reweighting'' studies, with extensive experimental results on fairness benchmarks demonstrating the superiority of our methods.

Related papers

• Towards Harmless Rawlsian Fairness Regardless of Demographic Prior [57.30787578956235]
  We explore the potential for achieving fairness without compromising its utility when no prior demographics are provided to the training set. We propose a simple but effective method named VFair to minimize the variance of training losses inside the optimal set of empirical losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T12:40:34Z)
• Fair Bilevel Neural Network (FairBiNN): On Balancing fairness and accuracy via Stackelberg Equilibrium [0.3350491650545292]
  Current methods for mitigating bias often result in information loss and an inadequate balance between accuracy and fairness. We propose a novel methodology grounded in bilevel optimization principles. Our deep learning-based approach concurrently optimize for both accuracy and fairness objectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T18:53:39Z)
• Dr. FERMI: A Stochastic Distributionally Robust Fair Empirical Risk Minimization Framework [12.734559823650887]
  In the presence of distribution shifts, fair machine learning models may behave unfairly on test data. Existing algorithms require full access to data and cannot be used when small batches are used. This paper proposes the first distributionally robust fairness framework with convergence guarantees that do not require knowledge of the causal graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-20T23:25:28Z)
• FairAdaBN: Mitigating unfairness with adaptive batch normalization and its application to dermatological disease classification [14.589159162086926]
  We propose FairAdaBN, which makes batch normalization adaptive to sensitive attribute. We propose a new metric, named Fairness-Accuracy Trade-off Efficiency (FATE), to compute normalized fairness improvement over accuracy drop. Experiments on two dermatological datasets show that our proposed method outperforms other methods on fairness criteria and FATE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-15T02:22:07Z)
• Fairness Reprogramming [42.65700878967251]
  We propose a new generic fairness learning paradigm, called FairReprogram, which incorporates the model reprogramming technique. Specifically, FairReprogram considers the case where models can not be changed and appends to the input a set of perturbations, called the fairness trigger. We show both theoretically and empirically that the fairness trigger can effectively obscure demographic biases in the output prediction of fixed ML models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-21T09:37:00Z)
• FairIF: Boosting Fairness in Deep Learning via Influence Functions with Validation Set Sensitive Attributes [51.02407217197623]
  We propose a two-stage training algorithm named FAIRIF. It minimizes the loss over the reweighted data set where the sample weights are computed. We show that FAIRIF yields models with better fairness-utility trade-offs against various types of bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T05:14:48Z)
• Unsupervised Learning of Debiased Representations with Pseudo-Attributes [85.5691102676175]
  We propose a simple but effective debiasing technique in an unsupervised manner. We perform clustering on the feature embedding space and identify pseudoattributes by taking advantage of the clustering results. We then employ a novel cluster-based reweighting scheme for learning debiased representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-06T05:20:46Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
• Learning Diverse Representations for Fast Adaptation to Distribution Shift [78.83747601814669]
  We present a method for learning multiple models, incorporating an objective that pressures each to learn a distinct way to solve the task. We demonstrate our framework's ability to facilitate rapid adaptation to distribution shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-12T12:23:50Z)
• Learning the Truth From Only One Side of the Story [58.65439277460011]
  We focus on generalized linear models and show that without adjusting for this sampling bias, the model may converge suboptimally or even fail to converge to the optimal solution. We propose an adaptive approach that comes with theoretical guarantees and show that it outperforms several existing methods empirically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-08T18:20:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.