Kolb-Based Experiential Learning for Generalist Agents with Human-Level Kaggle Data Science Performance

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03562v3
• Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 15:34:58 GMT
• Title: Kolb-Based Experiential Learning for Generalist Agents with Human-Level Kaggle Data Science Performance
• Authors: Antoine Grosnit, Alexandre Maraval, Refinath S N, Zichao Zhao, James Doran, Giuseppe Paolo, Albert Thomas, Jonas Gonzalez, Abhineet Kumar, Khyati Khandelwal, Abdelhakim Benechehab, Hamza Cherkaoui, Youssef Attia El-Hili, Kun Shao, Jianye Hao, Jun Yao, Balázs Kégl, Haitham Bou-Ammar, Jun Wang,
• Abstract summary: We propose a computational framework of Kolb's learning cycle with Vygotsky's ZPD for autonomous agents.<n>Agent K is the 1st AI system to successfully integrate Kolb- and Vygotsky-inspired human cognitive learning.<n>With 9 gold, 8 silver, and 12 bronze medals level performance - including 4 gold and 4 silver on prize-awarding competitions - Agent K is the 1st AI system to successfully integrate Kolb- and Vygotsky-inspired human cognitive learning.
• Score: 81.05882480184587
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Human expertise emerges through iterative cycles of interaction, reflection, and internal model updating, which are central to cognitive theories such as Kolb's experiential learning and Vygotsky's zone of proximal development. In contrast, current AI systems, particularly LLM agents, rely on static pre-training or rigid workflows, lacking mechanisms for continual adaptation. Recent studies identified early cognitive traits in LLM agents (reflection, revision, and self-correction) suggesting foundational elements of human-like experiential learning. Thus the key question: Can we design LLM agents capable of structured, cognitively grounded learning similar to human processes? In response, we propose a computational framework of Kolb's learning cycle with Vygotsky's ZPD for autonomous agents. Our architecture separates extrinsic (environment interaction) and intrinsic (internal reflection/abstraction) functions, enabling cognitively grounded scaffolded learning, where the agent initially learns within structured environments, followed by open-ended generalisation. This approach empowers agents to master complex tasks ; domains that traditional fine-tuning or simple reflective methods could not tackle effectively. Its potential is powerfully demonstrated via direct comparison with humans in real-world Kaggle data science competitions. Learning fully automated data science code generation across 81 tasks, our system, Agent K, demonstrated the ability to perform the entire workflow autonomously, achieving an Elo-MMR score of 1694, beyond median score of the Kaggle Masters (the top 2% among 200,000 users) of our study. With 9 gold, 8 silver, and 12 bronze medals level performance - including 4 gold and 4 silver on prize-awarding competitions - Agent K is the 1st AI system to successfully integrate Kolb- and Vygotsky-inspired human cognitive learning, marking a major step toward generalist AI.

Related papers

• SkillRL: Evolving Agents via Recursive Skill-Augmented Reinforcement Learning [83.98129545309277]
  We propose SkillRL, a framework that bridges the gap between raw experience and policy improvement.<n>Our approach introduces an experience-based distillation mechanism to build a hierarchical skill library SkillBank.<n> Experimental results on ALF, WebShop and seven search-augmented tasks demonstrate that SkillRL achieves state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T03:17:17Z)
• eSapiens: A Platform for Secure and Auditable Retrieval-Augmented Generation [10.667949307405983]
  eSapiens is an AI-as-a-Service (AI) platform engineered around a business-oriented trifecta: proprietary data, operational, and any major Large Language Model (LLM)<n>eSapiens gives businesses full control over their AI assets, keeping everything in-house for AI knowledge retention and data security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-13T11:41:44Z)
• SciMaster: Towards General-Purpose Scientific AI Agents, Part I. X-Master as Foundation: Can We Lead on Humanity's Last Exam? [51.112225746095746]
  We introduce X-Master, a tool-augmented reasoning agent designed to emulate human researchers.<n>X-Masters sets a new state-of-the-art record on Humanity's Last Exam with a score of 32.1%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T17:50:52Z)
• Thinking Beyond Tokens: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Cognitive Foundations for Artificial General Intelligence and its Societal Impact [27.722167796617114]
  This paper offers a cross-disciplinary synthesis of artificial intelligence, cognitive neuroscience, psychology, generative models, and agent-based systems.<n>We analyze the architectural and cognitive foundations of general intelligence, highlighting the role of modular reasoning, persistent memory, and multi-agent coordination.<n>We identify key scientific, technical, and ethical challenges on the path to Artificial General Intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-01T16:52:25Z)
• Two Heads are Better Than One: Test-time Scaling of Multi-agent Collaborative Reasoning [29.580108004844856]
  Multi-agent systems (MAS) built on large language models (LLMs) offer a promising path toward solving complex, real-world tasks. Recent advancements in test-time scaling (TTS) have significantly improved single-agent performance on challenging reasoning tasks. We introduce an adaptive multi-agent framework designed to enhance collaborative reasoning through both model-level training and system-level coordination.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T00:27:45Z)
• Generalising from Self-Produced Data: Model Training Beyond Human Constraints [0.0]
  This paper introduces a novel framework in which AI models autonomously generate and validate new knowledge.<n>Central to this approach is an unbounded, ungamable numeric reward that guides learning without requiring human benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T03:48:02Z)
• Boosting Virtual Agent Learning and Reasoning: A Step-wise, Multi-dimensional, and Generalist Reward Model with Benchmark [72.46357004059661]
  We propose Similar, a step-wise Multi-dimensional Generalist Reward Model. It offers fine-grained signals for agent training and can choose better action for inference-time scaling. We introduce the first benchmark in the virtual agent domain for step-wise, multi-dimensional reward model training and evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T13:30:47Z)
• MultiAgentBench: Evaluating the Collaboration and Competition of LLM agents [59.825725526176655]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities as autonomous agents. Existing benchmarks either focus on single-agent tasks or are confined to narrow domains, failing to capture the dynamics of multi-agent coordination and competition. We introduce MultiAgentBench, a benchmark designed to evaluate LLM-based multi-agent systems across diverse, interactive scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T05:18:50Z)
• AutoKaggle: A Multi-Agent Framework for Autonomous Data Science Competitions [45.0447118979891]
  AutoKaggle implements an iterative development process that combines code execution and unit testing to ensure code correctness and logic consistency. Our universal data science toolkit, comprising validated functions for data cleaning, feature engineering, and modeling, forms the foundation of this solution. AutoKaggle achieves a validation rate of 0.85 and a comprehensive score of 0.82 in typical data science pipelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T12:44:25Z)
• MLE-bench: Evaluating Machine Learning Agents on Machine Learning Engineering [35.237253622981264]
  MLE-bench is a benchmark for measuring how well AI agents perform at machine learning engineering. We curate 75 ML engineering-related competitions from Kaggle. We establish human baselines for each competition using Kaggle's publicly available leaderboards.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:34:27Z)
• Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
  We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process. We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals. The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z)
• Pangu-Agent: A Fine-Tunable Generalist Agent with Structured Reasoning [50.47568731994238]
  Key method for creating Artificial Intelligence (AI) agents is Reinforcement Learning (RL) This paper presents a general framework model for integrating and learning structured reasoning into AI agents' policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-22T17:57:57Z)
• Tool-Augmented Reward Modeling [58.381678612409]
  We propose a tool-augmented preference modeling approach, named Themis, to address limitations by empowering RMs with access to external environments. Our study delves into the integration of external tools into RMs, enabling them to interact with diverse external sources. In human evaluations, RLHF trained with Themis attains an average win rate of 32% when compared to baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T09:47:40Z)
• Incremental procedural and sensorimotor learning in cognitive humanoid robots [52.77024349608834]
  This work presents a cognitive agent that can learn procedures incrementally. We show the cognitive functions required in each substage and how adding new functions helps address tasks previously unsolved by the agent. Results show that this approach is capable of solving complex tasks incrementally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-30T22:51:31Z)
• Self-Supervised Representation Learning from Temporal Ordering of Automated Driving Sequences [49.91741677556553]
  We propose TempO, a temporal ordering pretext task for pre-training region-level feature representations for perception tasks. We embed each frame by an unordered set of proposal feature vectors, a representation that is natural for object detection or tracking systems. Extensive evaluations on the BDD100K, nuImages, and MOT17 datasets show that our TempO pre-training approach outperforms single-frame self-supervised learning methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T18:18:27Z)
• Ensemble Value Functions for Efficient Exploration in Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning [18.762198598488066]
  Multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) requires agents to explore within a vast joint action space. EMAX is a framework to seamlessly extend value-based MARL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T12:51:20Z)
• Improving Multimodal Interactive Agents with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [16.268581985382433]
  An important goal in artificial intelligence is to create agents that can both interact naturally with humans and learn from their feedback. Here we demonstrate how to use reinforcement learning from human feedback to improve upon simulated, embodied agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-21T16:00:31Z)
• DAAS: Differentiable Architecture and Augmentation Policy Search [107.53318939844422]
  This work considers the possible coupling between neural architectures and data augmentation and proposes an effective algorithm jointly searching for them. Our approach achieves 97.91% accuracy on CIFAR-10 and 76.6% Top-1 accuracy on ImageNet dataset, showing the outstanding performance of our search algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-30T17:15:17Z)
• COM2SENSE: A Commonsense Reasoning Benchmark with Complementary Sentences [21.11065466376105]
  Commonsense reasoning is intuitive for humans but has been a long-term challenge for artificial intelligence (AI) Recent advancements in pretrained language models have shown promising results on several commonsense benchmark datasets. We introduce a new commonsense reasoning benchmark dataset comprising natural language true/false statements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-02T06:31:55Z)
• Cognitive architecture aided by working-memory for self-supervised multi-modal humans recognition [54.749127627191655]
  The ability to recognize human partners is an important social skill to build personalized and long-term human-robot interactions. Deep learning networks have achieved state-of-the-art results and demonstrated to be suitable tools to address such a task. One solution is to make robots learn from their first-hand sensory data with self-supervision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-16T13:50:24Z)
• How much progress have we made in neural network training? A New Evaluation Protocol for Benchmarking Optimizers [86.36020260204302]
  We propose a new benchmarking protocol to evaluate both end-to-end efficiency and data-addition training efficiency. A human study is conducted to show that our evaluation protocol matches human tuning behavior better than the random search. We then apply the proposed benchmarking framework to 7s and various tasks, including computer vision, natural language processing, reinforcement learning, and graph mining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T21:46:39Z)
• AIBench Training: Balanced Industry-Standard AI Training Benchmarking [26.820244556465333]
  Earlier-stage evaluations of a new AI architecture/system need affordable benchmarks. We use real-world benchmarks to cover the factors space that impacts the learning dynamics. We contribute by far the most comprehensive AI training benchmark suite.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-30T11:08:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.