Both Text and Images Leaked! A Systematic Analysis of Multimodal LLM Data Contamination
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.03823v1
- Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2024 10:44:15 GMT
- Title: Both Text and Images Leaked! A Systematic Analysis of Multimodal LLM Data Contamination
- Authors: Dingjie Song, Sicheng Lai, Shunian Chen, Lichao Sun, Benyou Wang,
- Abstract summary: multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have demonstrated superior performance on various multimodal benchmarks.
The issue of data contamination during training creates challenges in performance evaluation and comparison.
We introduce a multimodal data contamination detection framework, MM-Detect, designed for MLLMs.
- Score: 18.586654412992168
- License:
- Abstract: The rapid progression of multimodal large language models (MLLMs) has demonstrated superior performance on various multimodal benchmarks. However, the issue of data contamination during training creates challenges in performance evaluation and comparison. While numerous methods exist for detecting dataset contamination in large language models (LLMs), they are less effective for MLLMs due to their various modalities and multiple training phases. In this study, we introduce a multimodal data contamination detection framework, MM-Detect, designed for MLLMs. Our experimental results indicate that MM-Detect is sensitive to varying degrees of contamination and can highlight significant performance improvements due to leakage of the training set of multimodal benchmarks. Furthermore, We also explore the possibility of contamination originating from the pre-training phase of LLMs used by MLLMs and the fine-tuning phase of MLLMs, offering new insights into the stages at which contamination may be introduced.
Related papers
- Exploring Large Language Models for Multimodal Sentiment Analysis: Challenges, Benchmarks, and Future Directions [0.0]
Multimodal Aspect-Based Sentiment Analysis (MABSA) aims to extract aspect terms and their corresponding sentiment polarities from multimodal information, including text and images.
Traditional supervised learning methods have shown effectiveness in this task, but the adaptability of large language models (LLMs) to MABSA remains uncertain.
Recent advances in LLMs, such as Llama2, LLaVA, and ChatGPT, demonstrate strong capabilities in general tasks, yet their performance in complex and fine-grained scenarios like MABSA is underexplored.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-23T02:17:10Z) - LLaVA-KD: A Framework of Distilling Multimodal Large Language Models [70.19607283302712]
We propose a novel framework to transfer knowledge from l-MLLM to s-MLLM.
Specifically, we introduce Multimodal Distillation (MDist) to minimize the divergence between the visual-textual output distributions of l-MLLM and s-MLLM.
We also propose a three-stage training scheme to fully exploit the potential of s-MLLM.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-21T17:41:28Z) - Beyond Binary: Towards Fine-Grained LLM-Generated Text Detection via Role Recognition and Involvement Measurement [51.601916604301685]
Large language models (LLMs) generate content that can undermine trust in online discourse.
Current methods often focus on binary classification, failing to address the complexities of real-world scenarios like human-LLM collaboration.
To move beyond binary classification and address these challenges, we propose a new paradigm for detecting LLM-generated content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T08:14:10Z) - RA-BLIP: Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training [55.54020926284334]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently received substantial interest, which shows their emerging potential as general-purpose models for various vision-language tasks.
Retrieval augmentation techniques have proven to be effective plugins for both LLMs and MLLMs.
In this study, we propose multimodal adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training (RA-BLIP), a novel retrieval-augmented framework for various MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T03:45:19Z) - Understanding the Role of LLMs in Multimodal Evaluation Benchmarks [77.59035801244278]
This paper investigates the role of the Large Language Model (LLM) backbone in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) evaluation.
Our study encompasses four diverse MLLM benchmarks and eight state-of-the-art MLLMs.
Key findings reveal that some benchmarks allow high performance even without visual inputs and up to 50% of error rates can be attributed to insufficient world knowledge in the LLM backbone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-16T07:49:13Z) - Towards Data Contamination Detection for Modern Large Language Models: Limitations, Inconsistencies, and Oracle Challenges [3.0455427910850785]
We evaluate five contamination detection approaches with four state-of-the-art LLMs across eight challenging datasets.
Our analysis reveals that current methods have non-trivial limitations in their assumptions and practical applications.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-16T02:04:33Z) - CoMMIT: Coordinated Instruction Tuning for Multimodal Large Language Models [68.64605538559312]
In this paper, we analyze the MLLM instruction tuning from both theoretical and empirical perspectives.
Inspired by our findings, we propose a measurement to quantitatively evaluate the learning balance.
In addition, we introduce an auxiliary loss regularization method to promote updating of the generation distribution of MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-29T23:18:55Z) - MIA-Bench: Towards Better Instruction Following Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs [47.94710556156627]
MIA-Bench is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal large language models (MLLMs) on their ability to strictly adhere to complex instructions.
Our benchmark comprises a diverse set of 400 image-prompt pairs, each crafted to challenge the models' compliance with layered instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T17:53:35Z) - GenCeption: Evaluate Multimodal LLMs with Unlabeled Unimodal Data [3.08543976986593]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are typically assessed using expensive annotated multimodal benchmarks.
This paper outlines and validates GenCeption, a novel, annotation-free evaluation method.
It requires only unimodal data to measure inter-modality semantic coherence and inversely assesses MLLMs' tendency to hallucinate.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T21:22:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.