Online Budgeted Matching with General Bids
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04204v2
- Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 04:14:55 GMT
- Title: Online Budgeted Matching with General Bids
- Authors: Jianyi Yang, Pengfei Li, Adam Wierman, Shaolei Ren,
- Abstract summary: We tackle the problem of Online Budgeted Matching (OBM) with general bids.
We first establish an upper bound of 1-kappa on the competitive ratio for any deterministic online algorithm.
We then propose a novel meta algorithm, called MetaAd, which reduces to different algorithms with first known provable competitive ratios.
- Score: 40.142341503145275
- License:
- Abstract: Online Budgeted Matching (OBM) is a classic problem with important applications in online advertising, online service matching, revenue management, and beyond. Traditional online algorithms typically assume a small bid setting, where the maximum bid-to-budget ratio (\kappa) is infinitesimally small. While recent algorithms have tried to address scenarios with non-small or general bids, they often rely on the Fractional Last Matching (FLM) assumption, which allows for accepting partial bids when the remaining budget is insufficient. This assumption, however, does not hold for many applications with indivisible bids. In this paper, we remove the FLM assumption and tackle the open problem of OBM with general bids. We first establish an upper bound of 1-\kappa on the competitive ratio for any deterministic online algorithm. We then propose a novel meta algorithm, called MetaAd, which reduces to different algorithms with first known provable competitive ratios parameterized by the maximum bid-to-budget ratio \kappa \in [0, 1]. As a by-product, we extend MetaAd to the FLM setting and get provable competitive algorithms. Finally, we apply our competitive analysis to the design learning-augmented algorithms.
Related papers
- No-Regret Algorithms in non-Truthful Auctions with Budget and ROI Constraints [0.9694940903078658]
We study the problem of designing online autobidding algorithms to optimize value subject to ROI and budget constraints.
Our main result is an algorithm with full information feedback that guarantees a near-optimal $tilde O(sqrt T)$ regret with respect to the best Lipschitz function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-15T14:31:53Z) - Strategically-Robust Learning Algorithms for Bidding in First-Price Auctions [11.988955088595858]
Learning to bid in repeated first-price auctions is a fundamental problem at the interface of game theory and machine learning.
We propose a novel concave formulation for pure-strategy bidding in first-price auctions, and use it to analyze natural Gradient-Ascent-based algorithms for this problem.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T01:33:33Z) - Autobidders with Budget and ROI Constraints: Efficiency, Regret, and Pacing Dynamics [53.62091043347035]
We study a game between autobidding algorithms that compete in an online advertising platform.
We propose a gradient-based learning algorithm that is guaranteed to satisfy all constraints and achieves vanishing individual regret.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-30T21:59:30Z) - Minimalistic Predictions to Schedule Jobs with Online Precedence
Constraints [117.8317521974783]
We consider non-clairvoyant scheduling with online precedence constraints.
An algorithm is oblivious to any job dependencies and learns about a job only if all of its predecessors have been completed.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-30T13:17:15Z) - Online Bidding Algorithms for Return-on-Spend Constrained Advertisers [10.500109788348732]
This work explores efficient online algorithms for a single value-maximizing advertiser under an increasingly popular constraint: Return-on-Spend (RoS)
We contribute a simple online algorithm that achieves near-optimal regret in expectation while always respecting the specified RoS constraint.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-29T16:49:24Z) - Improved Bounds for Online Facility Location with Predictions [14.973636284231047]
We consider Online Facility Location in the framework of learning-augmented online algorithms.
In OFL, demands arrive one-by-one in a metric space and must be assigned to an open facility upon arrival.
We present an online algorithm for OFL that exploits potentially imperfect predictions on the locations of the optimal facilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-17T16:44:27Z) - Bayesian decision-making under misspecified priors with applications to
meta-learning [64.38020203019013]
Thompson sampling and other sequential decision-making algorithms are popular approaches to tackle explore/exploit trade-offs in contextual bandits.
We show that performance degrades gracefully with misspecified priors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-03T23:17:26Z) - Online Adversarial Attacks [57.448101834579624]
We formalize the online adversarial attack problem, emphasizing two key elements found in real-world use-cases.
We first rigorously analyze a deterministic variant of the online threat model.
We then propose algoname, a simple yet practical algorithm yielding a provably better competitive ratio for $k=2$ over the current best single threshold algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-03-02T20:36:04Z) - Necessarily Optimal One-Sided Matchings [49.0517583218216]
We study the classical problem of matching $n$ agents to $n$ objects, where the agents have ranked preferences over the objects.
Instead of asking the agents to report their complete preferences, our goal is to learn a desirable matching from partial preferences.
We design efficient algorithms to check if a given matching is NPO or NRM, and to check whether such a matching exists given top-$k$ partial preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-17T16:01:34Z) - Learning to Bid Optimally and Efficiently in Adversarial First-price
Auctions [40.30925727499806]
We develop the first minimax optimal online bidding algorithm that achieves an $widetildeO(sqrtT)$ regret.
We test our algorithm on three real-world first-price auction datasets obtained from Verizon Media.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-07-09T05:40:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.