The New Dynamics of Open Source: Relicensing, Forks, & Community Impact

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.04739v1
• Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 14:21:45 GMT
• Title: The New Dynamics of Open Source: Relicensing, Forks, & Community Impact
• Authors: Dawn Foster,
• Abstract summary: Vendors are relicensing popular open source projects to more restrictive licenses in the hopes of generating more revenue. This research compares organizational affiliation data from three case studies based on license changes that resulted in forks. Research indicates that the forks resulting from these relicensing events have more organizational diversity than the original projects.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Many popular open source projects are owned and driven by vendors, and in today's difficult economic climate, those vendors are under increasing pressure from investors to deliver a strong return on their investments. One response to this pressure has been the relicensing of popular open source projects to more restrictive licenses in the hopes of generating more revenue, disrupting the idea of open source as a digital commons. In some cases, relicensing has resulted in a hard fork of the original project. These relicensing events and resulting forks can be disruptive to the organizations and individuals using these open source projects. This research compares and contrasts organizational affiliation data from three case studies based on license changes that resulted in forks: Elasticsearch / OpenSearch, Redis / Valkey, and Terraform / OpenTofu. The research indicates that the forks resulting from these relicensing events have more organizational diversity than the original projects, especially when the forks are created under a neutral foundation, like the Linux Foundation, rather than by a single company.

Related papers

• Characterising Open Source Co-opetition in Company-hosted Open Source Software Projects: The Cases of PyTorch, TensorFlow, and Transformers [5.2337753974570616]
  Companies, including market rivals, have long collaborated on the development of open source software (OSS) "Open source co-opetition" results in a tangle of co-operation and competition known as "open source co-opetition"
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T19:35:41Z)
• OpenR: An Open Source Framework for Advanced Reasoning with Large Language Models [61.14336781917986]
  We introduce OpenR, an open-source framework for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs) OpenR unifies data acquisition, reinforcement learning training, and non-autoregressive decoding into a cohesive software platform. Our work is the first to provide an open-source framework that explores the core techniques of OpenAI's o1 model with reinforcement learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-12T23:42:16Z)
• An Overview and Catalogue of Dependency Challenges in Open Source Software Package Registries [52.23798016734889]
  This article provides a catalogue of dependency-related challenges that come with relying on OSS packages or libraries. The catalogue is based on the scientific literature on empirical research that has been conducted to understand, quantify and overcome these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T16:20:20Z)
• On the modification and revocation of open source licences [0.14843690728081999]
  This paper argues for the creation of a subset of rights that allows open source contributors to force users to update to the most recent version of a model. Legal, reputational and moral risks related to open-sourcing AI models could justify contributors having more control over downstream uses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T00:00:25Z)
• On the Societal Impact of Open Foundation Models [93.67389739906561]
  We focus on open foundation models, defined here as those with broadly available model weights. We identify five distinctive properties of open foundation models that lead to both their benefits and risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T16:49:53Z)
• OLMo: Accelerating the Science of Language Models [165.16277690540363]
  Language models (LMs) have become ubiquitous in both NLP research and in commercial product offerings. As their commercial importance has surged, the most powerful models have become closed off, gated behind proprietary interfaces. We believe it is essential for the research community to have access to powerful, truly open LMs. We have built OLMo, a competitive, truly Open Language Model, to enable the scientific study of language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T18:28:55Z)
• Towards a Structural Equation Model of Open Source Blockchain Software Health [0.0]
  This work uses exploratory factor analysis to identify latent constructs that are representative of general public interest or popularity in software. We find that interest is a combination of stars, forks, and text mentions in the GitHub repository, while a second factor for robustness is composed of a criticality score. A structural model of software health is proposed such that general interest positively influences developer engagement, which, in turn, positively predicts software robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T08:47:41Z)
• Construction and Applications of Billion-Scale Pre-Trained Multimodal Business Knowledge Graph [64.42060648398743]
  We introduce the process of building an open business knowledge graph (OpenBG) derived from a well-known enterprise, Alibaba Group. OpenBG is an open business KG of unprecedented scale: 2.6 billion triples with more than 88 million entities covering over 1 million core classes/concepts and 2,681 types of relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-30T04:03:26Z)
• A Survey on Neural Open Information Extraction: Current Status and Future Directions [87.30702606041407]
  Open Information Extraction (OpenIE) facilitates domain-independent discovery of relational facts from large corpora. We provide an overview of the-state-of-the-art neural OpenIE models, their key design decisions, strengths and weakness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T02:24:55Z)
• Fork Entropy: Assessing the Diversity of Open Source Software Projects' Forks [5.731244417287598]
  We propose an approach to measure the diversity of an OSS project's forks (i.e., its fork population) We devise a novel fork entropy metric based on Rao's quadratic entropy to measure such diversity. With properties including symmetry, continuity, and monotonicity, the proposed fork entropy metric is effective in quantifying the diversity of a project's fork population.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-20T02:39:22Z)
• "We do not appreciate being experimented on": Developer and Researcher Views on the Ethics of Experiments on Open-Source Projects [0.0]
  We conduct a survey among open source developers and empirical software engineering researchers to see what behaviors they think are acceptable. Results indicate that open-source developers are largely open to research, provided it is done transparently. It is recommended that open source repositories and projects address use for research in their access guidelines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-25T09:23:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.