CI/CD Configuration Practices in Open-Source Android Apps: An Empirical Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06077v1
• Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 05:46:43 GMT
• Title: CI/CD Configuration Practices in Open-Source Android Apps: An Empirical Study
• Authors: Taher A. Ghaleb, Osamah Abduljalil, Safwat Hassan,
• Abstract summary: We conduct an empirical study on Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery practices in 2,564 Android apps. We observe a lack of commonality and standards across projects and services, leading to complex YML configurations. Our study emphasizes the necessity for automation and AI-powered tools to improve CI/CD processes for mobile applications.
• Score: 0.1433758865948252
• License:
• Abstract: Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) is a well-established practice that automatically builds, tests, packages, and deploys software systems. To adopt CI/CD, software developers need to configure their projects using dedicated YML configuration files. Mobile applications have distinct characteristics when it comes to CI/CD practices, such as testing on various emulators and deploying to app stores. However, little is known about the challenges and added value of adopting CI/CD in mobile applications and how developers maintain such a practice. In this paper, we conduct an empirical study on CI/CD practices in 2,564 Android apps adopting four popular CI/CD services, namely GitHub Actions, Travis CI, CircleCI, and GitLab CI/CD. We observe a lack of commonality and standards across projects and services, leading to complex YML configurations and associated maintenance efforts. We also observe that CI/CD configurations focus primarily on the build setup, with around half of the projects performing standard testing and only 9% incorporating deployment. In addition, we find that CI/CD configurations are changed bi-monthly on average, with frequent maintenance correlating with active issue tracking, project size/age, and community engagement. Our qualitative analysis of commits uncovered 11 themes in CI/CD maintenance activities, with over a third of the changes focusing on improving workflows and fixing build issues, while another third involves updating the build environment, tools, and dependencies. Our study emphasizes the necessity for automation and AI-powered tools to improve CI/CD processes for mobile applications, and advocates for creating adaptable open-source tools to efficiently manage resources, especially in testing and deployment.

Related papers

• Codev-Bench: How Do LLMs Understand Developer-Centric Code Completion? [60.84912551069379]
  We present the Code-Development Benchmark (Codev-Bench), a fine-grained, real-world, repository-level, and developer-centric evaluation framework. Codev-Agent is an agent-based system that automates repository crawling, constructs execution environments, extracts dynamic calling chains from existing unit tests, and generates new test samples to avoid data leakage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-02T09:11:10Z)
• Open-CD: A Comprehensive Toolbox for Change Detection [59.79011759027916]
  Open-CD is a change detection toolbox that contains a rich set of change detection methods as well as related components and modules. It gradually evolves into a unified platform that covers many popular change detection methods and contemporary modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-22T01:04:16Z)
• Detecting Continuous Integration Skip : A Reinforcement Learning-based Approach [0.4297070083645049]
  Continuous Integration (CI) practices facilitate the seamless integration of code changes by employing automated building and testing processes. Some frameworks, such as Travis CI and GitHub Actions have significantly contributed to simplifying and enhancing the CI process. Developers continue to encounter difficulties in accurately flagging commits as either suitable for CI execution or as candidates for skipping.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-15T18:48:57Z)
• SOEN-101: Code Generation by Emulating Software Process Models Using Large Language Model Agents [50.82665351100067]
  FlowGen is a code generation framework that emulates software process models based on multiple Large Language Model (LLM) agents. We evaluate FlowGenScrum on four benchmarks: HumanEval, HumanEval-ET, MBPP, and MBPP-ET.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-23T14:04:48Z)
• Empirical Analysis on CI/CD Pipeline Evolution in Machine Learning Projects [1.181206257787103]
  This work presents the first empirical analysis of how continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) configuration evolves for machine learning (ML) software systems. We manually analyzed 343 commits collected from 508 open-source ML projects to identify common CI/CD configuration change categories. We developed a CI/CD configuration change clustering tool that identified frequent CI/CD configuration change patterns in 15,634 commits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T19:14:38Z)
• Chronicles of CI/CD: A Deep Dive into its Usage Over Time [0.5705775078773656]
  This paper analyzes the technologies developers use for CI/CD by analyzing GitHub repositories. Using a list of the state-of-the-art CI/CD technologies, we use the GitHub search API to find repositories using each of these technologies. We provide an overview of the use of CI/CD technologies in our days, but also what happened in the last 12 years.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-27T15:20:11Z)
• OS-Copilot: Towards Generalist Computer Agents with Self-Improvement [48.29860831901484]
  We introduce OS-Copilot, a framework to build generalist agents capable of interfacing with comprehensive elements in an operating system (OS) We use OS-Copilot to create FRIDAY, a self-improving embodied agent for automating general computer tasks. On GAIA, a general AI assistants benchmark, FRIDAY outperforms previous methods by 35%, showcasing strong generalization to unseen applications via accumulated skills from previous tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T07:29:22Z)
• DevEval: Evaluating Code Generation in Practical Software Projects [52.16841274646796]
  We propose a new benchmark named DevEval, aligned with Developers' experiences in practical projects. DevEval is collected through a rigorous pipeline, containing 2,690 samples from 119 practical projects. We assess five popular LLMs on DevEval and reveal their actual abilities in code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T06:51:30Z)
• Toward Automatically Completing GitHub Workflows [16.302521048148748]
  We present GH-WCOM (GitHub COMpletion), a Transformer-based approach supporting developers in writing a specific type of CI/CD pipelines, namely GitHub. Our empirical study shows that GH-WCOM provides up to 34.23% correct predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-31T14:53:00Z)
• The GitHub Development Workflow Automation Ecosystems [47.818229204130596]
  Large-scale software development has become a highly collaborative endeavour. This chapter explores the ecosystems of development bots and GitHub Actions. It provides an extensive survey of the state-of-the-art in this domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T15:24:23Z)
• Collective Knowledge: organizing research projects as a database of reusable components and portable workflows with common APIs [0.2538209532048866]
  This article provides the motivation and overview of the Collective Knowledge framework (CK or cKnowledge) The CK concept is to decompose research projects into reusable components that encapsulate research artifacts. The long-term goal is to accelerate innovation by connecting researchers and practitioners to share and reuse all their knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T17:42:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.