EnvBench: A Benchmark for Automated Environment Setup

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2503.14443v1
• Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2025 17:19:12 GMT
• Title: EnvBench: A Benchmark for Automated Environment Setup
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models have enabled researchers to focus on practical repository-level tasks in software engineering domain.<n>Existing studies on environment setup introduce innovative agentic strategies, but their evaluation is often based on small datasets.<n>To address this gap, we introduce a comprehensive environment setup benchmark EnvBench.
• Score: 76.02998475135824
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have enabled researchers to focus on practical repository-level tasks in software engineering domain. In this work, we consider a cornerstone task for automating work with software repositories-environment setup, i.e., a task of configuring a repository-specific development environment on a system. Existing studies on environment setup introduce innovative agentic strategies, but their evaluation is often based on small datasets that may not capture the full range of configuration challenges encountered in practice. To address this gap, we introduce a comprehensive environment setup benchmark EnvBench. It encompasses 329 Python and 665 JVM-based (Java, Kotlin) repositories, with a focus on repositories that present genuine configuration challenges, excluding projects that can be fully configured by simple deterministic scripts. To enable further benchmark extension and usage for model tuning, we implement two automatic metrics: a static analysis check for missing imports in Python and a compilation check for JVM languages. We demonstrate the applicability of our benchmark by evaluating three environment setup approaches, including a simple zero-shot baseline and two agentic workflows, that we test with two powerful LLM backbones, GPT-4o and GPT-4o-mini. The best approach manages to successfully configure 6.69% repositories for Python and 29.47% repositories for JVM, suggesting that EnvBench remains challenging for current approaches. Our benchmark suite is publicly available at https://github.com/JetBrains-Research/EnvBench. The dataset and experiment trajectories are available at https://jb.gg/envbench.

Related papers

• WinDeskGround: A Benchmark for Robust GUI Grounding in Complex Multi-Window Desktop Environments [49.98994180610182]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have revolutionized GUI automation, yet their efficacy is largely established on idealized, single-layer interfaces.<n>This paper identifies a critical reliability gap: state-of-the-art agents face distinct challenges in real-world desktop environments.<n>We introduce WinDeskGround, a novel benchmark and synthesis framework tailored for evaluating GUI grounding robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-13T02:48:52Z)
• RAT: RunAnyThing via Fully Automated Environment Configuration [10.673596948238904]
  RAT (RunAnyThing) is a language-agnostic framework for automated environment configuration on arbitrary repositories.<n>We show that RAT achieves state-of-the-art performance, improving the Environment setup Success Rate (ESSR) by an average of 29.6% over strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-04-25T07:45:41Z)
• HerAgent: Rethinking the Automated Environment Deployment via Hierarchical Test Pyramid [15.944450159856602]
  We argue that environment setup success should be evaluated through executable evidence rather than a single binary signal.<n>We propose HerAgent, an automated environment setup approach that incrementally constructs executable environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-08T08:57:05Z)
• SWE-World: Building Software Engineering Agents in Docker-Free Environments [91.17484806743641]
  SWE-World is a Docker-free framework that replaces physical execution environments with a learned surrogate for training and evaluating software engineering agents.<n>We show that SWE-World raises Qwen2.5-Coder-32B from 6.2% to 52.0% via Docker-free SFT, 55.0% with Docker-free RL, and 68.2% with further TTS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T11:44:39Z)
• MEnvAgent: Scalable Polyglot Environment Construction for Verifiable Software Engineering [54.236614097082395]
  We introduce MEnvAgent, a framework for automated Environment construction.<n>MEnvAgent employs a multi-agent Planning-Execution-Verification architecture to autonomously resolve construction failures.<n>MEnvData-SWE is the largest open-source polyglot dataset of realistic verifiable Docker environments to date.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T11:36:10Z)
• TimeMachine-bench: A Benchmark for Evaluating Model Capabilities in Repository-Level Migration Tasks [12.573674060643787]
  TimeMachine-bench is a benchmark designed to evaluate software migration in real-world Python projects.<n>Our benchmark consists of GitHub repositories whose tests begin to fail in response to dependency updates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T05:42:45Z)
• EnvScaler: Scaling Tool-Interactive Environments for LLM Agent via Programmatic Synthesis [101.67583081810136]
  Large language models (LLMs) are expected to be trained to act as agents in various real-world environments.<n>This process relies on rich and varied tool-interaction sandboxes.<n>We propose EnvScaler, an automated framework for scalable tool-interaction environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-09T14:32:06Z)
• SWE-Bench++: A Framework for the Scalable Generation of Software Engineering Benchmarks from Open-Source Repositories [2.951332247539421]
  We introduce SWE-Bench++, an automated framework that generates repository-level coding tasks from open-source GitHub projects.<n>Unlike synthetic approaches, our pipeline harvests live pull requests to cover both bug fixes and feature requests across 11 languages.<n>Our initial benchmark consists of 11,133 instances from 3,971 repositories across 11 languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-19T10:16:51Z)
• PIPer: On-Device Environment Setup via Online Reinforcement Learning [74.52354321028493]
  Automated environment setup methods could assist developers by providing fully configured environments for arbitrary repositories without manual effort.<n>Recent studies reveal that even state-of-the-art Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve limited success in automating this task.<n>We combine supervised fine-tuning for generating correct scripts and Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) to adapt it to the task of environment setup.<n>On EnvBench-Python, our method enables Qwen3-8B (a model runnable on consumer hardware) to perform on par with larger models-Qwen3-32B and GPT-4
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T20:03:05Z)
• SetupBench: Assessing Software Engineering Agents' Ability to Bootstrap Development Environments [2.184775414778289]
  We introduce setupbench, a benchmark that isolates the environment-bootstrap skill.<n>Our tasks span seven language ecosystems, five database engines, and multi-service orchestration scenarios.<n>We find low success rates across task categories, with particular challenges in repository setup (38.9-57.4%) and local database configuration (20.0-53.3%)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-11T22:45:07Z)
• SWE-Factory: Your Automated Factory for Issue Resolution Training Data and Evaluation Benchmarks [34.8513098099929]
  SWE-Factory is an automated pipeline designed to create large-scale GitHub issue resolution datasets.<n>SWE-Builder is a multi-agent system that automates evaluation environment construction.<n> exit-code-based grading achieves 100% accuracy compared to manual inspection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T17:54:17Z)
• Automated Benchmark Generation for Repository-Level Coding Tasks [7.305342793164905]
  SetUpAgent is a fully automated system capable of historically accurate dependency setup, test execution, and result parsing. We generate two new datasets: (i) SWEE-Bench an extended version of SWE-Bench encompassing hundreds of repositories, and (ii) SWA-Bench a benchmark focusing on applications rather than libraries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-10T17:42:49Z)
• An LLM-based Agent for Reliable Docker Environment Configuration [9.436480907117415]
  Repo2Run is an agent designed to fully automate environment configuration and generate executable Dockerfiles for arbitrary Python repositories.<n>We address two major challenges: (1) enabling the LLM agent to configure environments within isolated Docker containers, and (2) ensuring the successful configuration process is recorded and accurately transferred to a Dockerfile without error.<n>We evaluate Repo2Runon our proposed benchmark of 420 recent Python repositories with unit tests, where it achieves an 86.4% success rate, outperforming the best baseline by 63.9%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T12:51:35Z)
• ExecRepoBench: Multi-level Executable Code Completion Evaluation [45.963424627710765]
  We introduce a novel framework for enhancing code completion in software development through the creation of a repository-level benchmark ExecRepoBench.<n>We present a multi-level grammar-based completion methodology conditioned on the abstract syntax tree to mask code fragments at various logical units.<n>Then, we fine-tune the open-source LLM with 7B parameters on Repo-Instruct to produce a strong code completion baseline model Qwen2.5-Coder-Instruct-C.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T17:14:35Z)
• Spider2-V: How Far Are Multimodal Agents From Automating Data Science and Engineering Workflows? [73.81908518992161]
  We introduce Spider2-V, the first multimodal agent benchmark focusing on professional data science and engineering. Spider2-V features real-world tasks in authentic computer environments and incorporating 20 enterprise-level professional applications. These tasks evaluate the ability of a multimodal agent to perform data-related tasks by writing code and managing the GUI in enterprise data software systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-15T17:54:37Z)
• CRAB: Cross-environment Agent Benchmark for Multimodal Language Model Agents [49.68117560675367]
  Crab is the first benchmark framework designed to support cross-environment tasks. Our framework supports multiple devices and can be easily extended to any environment with a Python interface. The experimental results demonstrate that the single agent with GPT-4o achieves the best completion ratio of 38.01%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T17:55:04Z)
• Class-Level Code Generation from Natural Language Using Iterative, Tool-Enhanced Reasoning over Repository [4.767858874370881]
  We introduce RepoClassBench, a benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate LLMs in generating class-level code within real-world repositories. RepoClassBench includes "Natural Language to Class generation" tasks across Java, Python & C# from a selection of repositories. We introduce Retrieve-Repotools-Reflect (RRR), a novel approach that equips LLMs with static analysis tools to iteratively navigate & reason about repository-level context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T03:52:54Z)
• AgentStudio: A Toolkit for Building General Virtual Agents [57.02375267926862]
  General virtual agents need to handle multimodal observations, master complex action spaces, and self-improve in dynamic, open-domain environments.<n>AgentStudio provides a lightweight, interactive environment with highly generic observation and action spaces.<n>It integrates tools for creating online benchmark tasks, annotating GUI elements, and labeling actions in videos.<n>Based on our environment and tools, we curate an online task suite that benchmarks both GUI interactions and function calling with efficient auto-evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-26T17:54:15Z)
• ML-Bench: Evaluating Large Language Models and Agents for Machine Learning Tasks on Repository-Level Code [76.84199699772903]
  ML-Bench is a benchmark rooted in real-world programming applications that leverage existing code repositories to perform tasks. To evaluate both Large Language Models (LLMs) and AI agents, two setups are employed: ML-LLM-Bench for assessing LLMs' text-to-code conversion within a predefined deployment environment, and ML-Agent-Bench for testing autonomous agents in an end-to-end task execution within a Linux sandbox environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T12:03:21Z)
• Learning Cross-Modal Affinity for Referring Video Object Segmentation Targeting Limited Samples [61.66967790884943]
  Referring video object segmentation (RVOS) relies on sufficient data for a given scene. In more realistic scenarios, only minimal annotations are available for a new scene. We propose a model with a newly designed cross-modal affinity (CMA) module based on a Transformer architecture. CMA module builds multimodal affinity with a few samples, thus quickly learning new semantic information, and enabling the model to adapt to different scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T08:34:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.