Differentially-Private Collaborative Online Personalized Mean Estimation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07094v1
• Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 16:14:56 GMT
• Title: Differentially-Private Collaborative Online Personalized Mean Estimation
• Authors: Yauhen Yakimenka, Chung-Wei Weng, Hsuan-Yin Lin, Eirik Rosnes, Jörg Kliewer,
• Abstract summary: We consider the problem of collaborative personalized mean estimation under a privacy constraint. Two privacy mechanisms and two data variance estimation schemes are proposed. We show that collaboration provides faster convergence than a fully local approach.
• Score: 22.399703712241546
• License:
• Abstract: We consider the problem of collaborative personalized mean estimation under a privacy constraint in an environment of several agents continuously receiving data according to arbitrary unknown agent-specific distributions. In particular, we provide a method based on hypothesis testing coupled with differential privacy and data variance estimation. Two privacy mechanisms and two data variance estimation schemes are proposed, and we provide a theoretical convergence analysis of the proposed algorithm for any bounded unknown distributions on the agents' data, showing that collaboration provides faster convergence than a fully local approach where agents do not share data. Moreover, we provide analytical performance curves for the case with an oracle class estimator, i.e., the class structure of the agents, where agents receiving data from distributions with the same mean are considered to be in the same class, is known. The theoretical faster-than-local convergence guarantee is backed up by extensive numerical results showing that for a considered scenario the proposed approach indeed converges much faster than a fully local approach, and performs comparably to ideal performance where all data is public. This illustrates the benefit of private collaboration in an online setting.

Related papers

• Distributed, communication-efficient, and differentially private estimation of KL divergence [15.294136011320433]
  Key task in managing distributed, sensitive data is to measure the extent to which a distribution changes. We describe novel algorithmic approaches for estimating the KL divergence of data across federated models of computation, under differential privacy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T15:20:40Z)
• Probabilistic Conformal Prediction with Approximate Conditional Validity [81.30551968980143]
  We develop a new method for generating prediction sets that combines the flexibility of conformal methods with an estimate of the conditional distribution. Our method consistently outperforms existing approaches in terms of conditional coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T20:44:48Z)
• Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference for Hybrid Language Model Evaluation [62.2436697657307]
  Prediction-powered inference (PPI) is a method that improves statistical estimates based on limited human-labeled data. We propose a method called Stratified Prediction-Powered Inference (StratPPI) We show that the basic PPI estimates can be considerably improved by employing simple data stratification strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-06T17:37:39Z)
• Optimal Aggregation of Prediction Intervals under Unsupervised Domain Shift [9.387706860375461]
  A distribution shift occurs when the underlying data-generating process changes, leading to a deviation in the model's performance. The prediction interval serves as a crucial tool for characterizing uncertainties induced by their underlying distribution. We propose methodologies for aggregating prediction intervals to obtain one with minimal width and adequate coverage on the target domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-16T17:55:42Z)
• Collaborative Heterogeneous Causal Inference Beyond Meta-analysis [68.4474531911361]
  We propose a collaborative inverse propensity score estimator for causal inference with heterogeneous data. Our method shows significant improvements over the methods based on meta-analysis when heterogeneity increases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-24T09:04:36Z)
• Scalable Decentralized Algorithms for Online Personalized Mean Estimation [12.002609934938224]
  This study focuses on a simplified version of the overarching problem, where each agent collects samples from a real-valued distribution over time to estimate its mean. We introduce two collaborative mean estimation algorithms: one draws inspiration from belief propagation, while the other employs a consensus-based approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T08:30:46Z)
• Communication-Efficient Distributed Estimation and Inference for Cox's Model [4.731404257629232]
  We develop communication-efficient iterative distributed algorithms for estimation and inference in the high-dimensional sparse Cox proportional hazards model. To construct confidence intervals for linear combinations of high-dimensional hazard regression coefficients, we introduce a novel debiased method. We provide valid and powerful distributed hypothesis tests for any coordinate element based on a decorrelated score test.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-23T15:50:17Z)
• Differentially Private Federated Clustering over Non-IID Data [59.611244450530315]
  clustering clusters (FedC) problem aims to accurately partition unlabeled data samples distributed over massive clients into finite clients under the orchestration of a server. We propose a novel FedC algorithm using differential privacy convergence technique, referred to as DP-Fed, in which partial participation and multiple clients are also considered. Various attributes of the proposed DP-Fed are obtained through theoretical analyses of privacy protection, especially for the case of non-identically and independently distributed (non-i.i.d.) data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-03T05:38:43Z)
• Correlated quantization for distributed mean estimation and optimization [21.17434087570296]
  We propose a correlated quantization protocol whose error guarantee depends on the deviation of data points instead of their absolute range. We show that applying the proposed protocol as sub-routine in distributed optimization algorithms leads to better convergence rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T18:14:55Z)
• Test-time Collective Prediction [73.74982509510961]
  Multiple parties in machine learning want to jointly make predictions on future test points. Agents wish to benefit from the collective expertise of the full set of agents, but may not be willing to release their data or model parameters. We explore a decentralized mechanism to make collective predictions at test time, leveraging each agent's pre-trained model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-22T18:29:58Z)
• Learning while Respecting Privacy and Robustness to Distributional Uncertainties and Adversarial Data [66.78671826743884]
  The distributionally robust optimization framework is considered for training a parametric model. The objective is to endow the trained model with robustness against adversarially manipulated input data. Proposed algorithms offer robustness with little overhead.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-07T18:25:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.