Collaborative Participatory Research with LLM Agents in South Asia: An Empirically-Grounded Methodological Initiative and Agenda from Field Evidence in Sri Lanka

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08294v1
• Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 02:21:59 GMT
• Title: Collaborative Participatory Research with LLM Agents in South Asia: An Empirically-Grounded Methodological Initiative and Agenda from Field Evidence in Sri Lanka
• Authors: Xinjie Zhao, Shyaman Maduranga Sriwarnasinghe, Jiacheng Tang, Shiyun Wang, Hao Wang, So Morikawa,
• Abstract summary: This paper presents an empirically grounded methodological framework designed to transform participatory development research. It is situated in the challenging multilingual context of Sri Lanka's flood-prone Nilwala River Basin. This research agenda advocates for AI-driven participatory research tools that maintain ethical considerations, cultural respect, and operational efficiency.
• Score: 4.2784137244658025
• License:
• Abstract: The integration of artificial intelligence into development research methodologies presents unprecedented opportunities for addressing persistent challenges in participatory research, particularly in linguistically diverse regions like South Asia. Drawing from an empirical implementation in Sri Lanka's Sinhala-speaking communities, this paper presents an empirically grounded methodological framework designed to transform participatory development research, situated in the challenging multilingual context of Sri Lanka's flood-prone Nilwala River Basin. Moving beyond conventional translation and data collection tools, this framework deploys a multi-agent system architecture that redefines how data collection, analysis, and community engagement are conducted in linguistically and culturally diverse research settings. This structured agent-based approach enables participatory research that is both scalable and responsive, ensuring that community perspectives remain integral to research outcomes. Field experiences reveal the immense potential of LLM-based systems in addressing long-standing issues in development research across resource-limited regions, offering both quantitative efficiencies and qualitative improvements in inclusivity. At a broader methodological level, this research agenda advocates for AI-driven participatory research tools that maintain ethical considerations, cultural respect, and operational efficiency, highlighting strategic pathways for deploying AI systems that reinforce community agency and equitable knowledge generation, potentially informing broader research agendas across the Global South.

Related papers

• Deploying Large Language Models With Retrieval Augmented Generation [0.21485350418225244]
  Retrieval Augmented Generation has emerged as a key approach for integrating knowledge from data sources outside of the large language model's training set. We present insights from the development and field-testing of a pilot project that integrates LLMs with RAG for information retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T22:11:51Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): Evolution, Current Landscape and Future Directions [0.0]
  RAG combines retrieval mechanisms with generative language models to enhance the accuracy of outputs. Recent research breakthroughs are discussed, highlighting novel methods for improving retrieval efficiency. Future research directions are proposed, focusing on improving the robustness of RAG models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T22:29:47Z)
• From Linguistic Giants to Sensory Maestros: A Survey on Cross-Modal Reasoning with Large Language Models [56.9134620424985]
  Cross-modal reasoning (CMR) is increasingly recognized as a crucial capability in the progression toward more sophisticated artificial intelligence systems. The recent trend of deploying Large Language Models (LLMs) to tackle CMR tasks has marked a new mainstream of approaches for enhancing their effectiveness. This survey offers a nuanced exposition of current methodologies applied in CMR using LLMs, classifying these into a detailed three-tiered taxonomy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T02:51:54Z)
• Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning: Synthesis and Opportunities [60.34182805429511]
  Retrieval-enhancement can be extended to a broader spectrum of machine learning (ML) This work introduces a formal framework of this paradigm, Retrieval-Enhanced Machine Learning (REML), by synthesizing the literature in various domains in ML with consistent notations which is missing from the current literature. The goal of this work is to equip researchers across various disciplines with a comprehensive, formally structured framework of retrieval-enhanced models, thereby fostering interdisciplinary future research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-17T20:01:21Z)
• A Survey on Retrieval-Augmented Text Generation for Large Language Models [1.4579344926652844]
  Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) merges retrieval methods with deep learning advancements. This paper organizes the RAG paradigm into four categories: pre-retrieval, retrieval, post-retrieval, and generation. It outlines RAG's evolution and discusses the field's progression through the analysis of significant studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T01:27:42Z)
• WESE: Weak Exploration to Strong Exploitation for LLM Agents [95.6720931773781]
  This paper proposes a novel approach, Weak Exploration to Strong Exploitation (WESE) to enhance LLM agents in solving open-world interactive tasks. WESE involves decoupling the exploration and exploitation process, employing a cost-effective weak agent to perform exploration tasks for global knowledge. A knowledge graph-based strategy is then introduced to store the acquired knowledge and extract task-relevant knowledge, enhancing the stronger agent in success rate and efficiency for the exploitation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T03:31:54Z)
• LLM as a Mastermind: A Survey of Strategic Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.89014602596673]
  Strategic reasoning requires understanding and predicting adversary actions in multi-agent settings while adjusting strategies accordingly. We explore the scopes, applications, methodologies, and evaluation metrics related to strategic reasoning with Large Language Models. It underscores the importance of strategic reasoning as a critical cognitive capability and offers insights into future research directions and potential improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T16:50:54Z)
• Recent Advances in Hate Speech Moderation: Multimodality and the Role of Large Models [52.24001776263608]
  This comprehensive survey delves into the recent strides in HS moderation. We highlight the burgeoning role of large language models (LLMs) and large multimodal models (LMMs) We identify existing gaps in research, particularly in the context of underrepresented languages and cultures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T03:51:44Z)
• Trends in Integration of Knowledge and Large Language Models: A Survey and Taxonomy of Methods, Benchmarks, and Applications [41.24492058141363]
  Large language models (LLMs) exhibit superior performance on various natural language tasks, but they are susceptible to issues stemming from outdated data and domain-specific limitations. We propose a review to discuss the trends in integration of knowledge and large language models, including taxonomy of methods, benchmarks, and applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-10T05:24:04Z)
• A Survey on Interpretable Cross-modal Reasoning [64.37362731950843]
  Cross-modal reasoning (CMR) has emerged as a pivotal area with applications spanning from multimedia analysis to healthcare diagnostics. This survey delves into the realm of interpretable cross-modal reasoning (I-CMR) This survey presents a comprehensive overview of the typical methods with a three-level taxonomy for I-CMR.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-05T05:06:48Z)
• Identifying Causal Influences on Publication Trends and Behavior: A Case Study of the Computational Linguistics Community [10.791197825505755]
  We present mixed-method analyses to investigate causal influences of publication trends and behavior. Key findings highlight the transition to rapidly emerging methodologies in the research community. We anticipate this work to provide useful insights about publication trends and behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T08:36:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.