Properties of fairness measures in the context of varying class imbalance and protected group ratios

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08425v1
• Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 08:18:03 GMT
• Title: Properties of fairness measures in the context of varying class imbalance and protected group ratios
• Authors: Dariusz Brzezinski, Julia Stachowiak, Jerzy Stefanowski, Izabela Szczech, Robert Susmaga, Sofya Aksenyuk, Uladzimir Ivashka, Oleksandr Yasinskyi,
• Abstract summary: We study the general properties of fairness measures for changing class and protected group proportions. We also measure how the probability of achieving perfect fairness changes for varying class imbalance ratios. Our results show that measures such as Equal Opportunity and Positive Predictive Parity are more sensitive to changes in class imbalance than Accuracy Equality.
• Score: 15.942660279740727
• License:
• Abstract: Society is increasingly relying on predictive models in fields like criminal justice, credit risk management, or hiring. To prevent such automated systems from discriminating against people belonging to certain groups, fairness measures have become a crucial component in socially relevant applications of machine learning. However, existing fairness measures have been designed to assess the bias between predictions for protected groups without considering the imbalance in the classes of the target variable. Current research on the potential effect of class imbalance on fairness focuses on practical applications rather than dataset-independent measure properties. In this paper, we study the general properties of fairness measures for changing class and protected group proportions. For this purpose, we analyze the probability mass functions of six of the most popular group fairness measures. We also measure how the probability of achieving perfect fairness changes for varying class imbalance ratios. Moreover, we relate the dataset-independent properties of fairness measures described in this paper to classifier fairness in real-life tasks. Our results show that measures such as Equal Opportunity and Positive Predictive Parity are more sensitive to changes in class imbalance than Accuracy Equality. These findings can help guide researchers and practitioners in choosing the most appropriate fairness measures for their classification problems.

Related papers

• Editable Fairness: Fine-Grained Bias Mitigation in Language Models [52.66450426729818]
  We propose a novel debiasing approach, Fairness Stamp (FAST), which enables fine-grained calibration of individual social biases. FAST surpasses state-of-the-art baselines with superior debiasing performance. This highlights the potential of fine-grained debiasing strategies to achieve fairness in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T17:14:58Z)
• Fairness-Accuracy Trade-Offs: A Causal Perspective [58.06306331390586]
  We analyze the tension between fairness and accuracy from a causal lens for the first time. We show that enforcing a causal constraint often reduces the disparity between demographic groups. We introduce a new neural approach for causally-constrained fair learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-24T11:19:52Z)
• Towards Fair Classification against Poisoning Attacks [52.57443558122475]
  We study the poisoning scenario where the attacker can insert a small fraction of samples into training data. We propose a general and theoretically guaranteed framework which accommodates traditional defense methods to fair classification against poisoning attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-18T00:49:58Z)
• Towards A Holistic View of Bias in Machine Learning: Bridging Algorithmic Fairness and Imbalanced Learning [8.602734307457387]
  A key element in achieving algorithmic fairness with respect to protected groups is the simultaneous reduction of class and protected group imbalance in the underlying training data. We propose a novel oversampling algorithm, Fair Oversampling, that addresses both skewed class distributions and protected features.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-13T09:48:52Z)
• Measuring Fairness of Text Classifiers via Prediction Sensitivity [63.56554964580627]
  ACCUMULATED PREDICTION SENSITIVITY measures fairness in machine learning models based on the model's prediction sensitivity to perturbations in input features. We show that the metric can be theoretically linked with a specific notion of group fairness (statistical parity) and individual fairness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-16T15:00:33Z)
• Parity-based Cumulative Fairness-aware Boosting [7.824964622317634]
  Data-driven AI systems can lead to discrimination on the basis of protected attributes like gender or race. We propose AdaFair, a fairness-aware boosting ensemble that changes the data distribution at each round. Our experiments show that our approach can achieve parity in terms of statistical parity, equal opportunity, and disparate mistreatment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-04T14:16:36Z)
• Measuring Fairness Under Unawareness of Sensitive Attributes: A Quantification-Based Approach [131.20444904674494]
  We tackle the problem of measuring group fairness under unawareness of sensitive attributes. We show that quantification approaches are particularly suited to tackle the fairness-under-unawareness problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-17T13:45:46Z)
• Fair Classification with Adversarial Perturbations [35.030329189029246]
  We study fair classification in the presence of an omniscient adversary that, given an $eta$, is allowed to choose an arbitrary $eta$-fraction of the training samples and arbitrarily perturb their protected attributes. Our main contribution is an optimization framework to learn fair classifiers in this adversarial setting that comes with provable guarantees on accuracy and fairness. We prove near-tightness of our framework's guarantees for natural hypothesis classes: no algorithm can have significantly better accuracy and any algorithm with better fairness must have lower accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-10T17:56:59Z)
• MultiFair: Multi-Group Fairness in Machine Learning [52.24956510371455]
  We study multi-group fairness in machine learning (MultiFair) We propose a generic end-to-end algorithmic framework to solve it. Our proposed framework is generalizable to many different settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-24T02:30:22Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.