Building Trustworthy AI: Transparent AI Systems via Large Language Models, Ontologies, and Logical Reasoning (TranspNet)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08469v2
• Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 14:45:15 GMT
• Title: Building Trustworthy AI: Transparent AI Systems via Large Language Models, Ontologies, and Logical Reasoning (TranspNet)
• Authors: Fadi Al Machot, Martin Thomas Horsch, Habib Ullah,
• Abstract summary: Growing concerns over the lack of transparency in AI, particularly in high-stakes fields like healthcare and finance, drive the need for explainable and trustworthy systems. To address this, the paper proposes the TranspNet pipeline, which integrates symbolic AI with Large Language Models.
• Score: 0.7420433640907689
• License:
• Abstract: Growing concerns over the lack of transparency in AI, particularly in high-stakes fields like healthcare and finance, drive the need for explainable and trustworthy systems. While Large Language Models (LLMs) perform exceptionally well in generating accurate outputs, their "black box" nature poses significant challenges to transparency and trust. To address this, the paper proposes the TranspNet pipeline, which integrates symbolic AI with LLMs. By leveraging domain expert knowledge, retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), and formal reasoning frameworks like Answer Set Programming (ASP), TranspNet enhances LLM outputs with structured reasoning and verification.This approach strives to help AI systems deliver results that are as accurate, explainable, and trustworthy as possible, aligning with regulatory expectations for transparency and accountability. TranspNet provides a solution for developing AI systems that are reliable and interpretable, making it suitable for real-world applications where trust is critical.

Related papers

• Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization [53.80919781981027]
  Key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of empirical risk minimization. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T07:53:32Z)
• Proof of Thought : Neurosymbolic Program Synthesis allows Robust and Interpretable Reasoning [1.3003982724617653]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized natural language processing, yet they struggle with inconsistent reasoning. This research introduces Proof of Thought, a framework that enhances the reliability and transparency of LLM outputs. Key contributions include a robust type system with sort management for enhanced logical integrity, explicit representation of rules for clear distinction between factual and inferential knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-25T18:35:45Z)
• TRACE: TRansformer-based Attribution using Contrastive Embeddings in LLMs [50.259001311894295]
  We propose a novel TRansformer-based Attribution framework using Contrastive Embeddings called TRACE. We show that TRACE significantly improves the ability to attribute sources accurately, making it a valuable tool for enhancing the reliability and trustworthiness of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-06T07:19:30Z)
• Mathematical Algorithm Design for Deep Learning under Societal and Judicial Constraints: The Algorithmic Transparency Requirement [65.26723285209853]
  We derive a framework to analyze whether a transparent implementation in a computing model is feasible. Based on previous results, we find that Blum-Shub-Smale Machines have the potential to establish trustworthy solvers for inverse problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-18T15:32:38Z)
• Towards a Responsible AI Metrics Catalogue: A Collection of Metrics for AI Accountability [28.67753149592534]
  This study bridges the accountability gap by introducing our effort towards a comprehensive metrics catalogue. Our catalogue delineates process metrics that underpin procedural integrity, resource metrics that provide necessary tools and frameworks, and product metrics that reflect the outputs of AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-22T04:43:16Z)
• Path To Gain Functional Transparency In Artificial Intelligence With Meaningful Explainability [0.0]
  As AI systems become increasingly sophisticated, ensuring their transparency and explainability becomes crucial. We propose a design for user-centered compliant-by-design transparency in transparent systems. By providing a comprehensive understanding of the challenges associated with transparency in AI systems, we aim to facilitate the development of AI systems that are accountable, trustworthy, and aligned with societal values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T04:25:30Z)
• Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency [132.0398250233924]
  We identify and characterize the emerging area of representation engineering (RepE) RepE places population-level representations, rather than neurons or circuits, at the center of analysis. We showcase how these methods can provide traction on a wide range of safety-relevant problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-02T17:59:07Z)
• Building Trust in Conversational AI: A Comprehensive Review and Solution Architecture for Explainable, Privacy-Aware Systems using LLMs and Knowledge Graph [0.33554367023486936]
  We introduce a comprehensive tool that provides an in-depth review of over 150 Large Language Models (LLMs) Building on this foundation, we propose a novel functional architecture that seamlessly integrates the structured dynamics of Knowledge Graphs with the linguistic capabilities of LLMs. Our architecture adeptly blends linguistic sophistication with factual rigour and further strengthens data security through Role-Based Access Control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-13T22:47:51Z)
• Users are the North Star for AI Transparency [111.5679109784322]
  Despite widespread calls for transparent artificial intelligence systems, the term is too overburdened with disparate meanings to express precise policy aims or to orient concrete lines of research. Part of why this happens is that a clear ideal of AI transparency goes unsaid in this body of work. We explicitly name such a north star -- transparency that is user-centered, user-appropriate, and honest.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-09T18:53:29Z)
• Explainable AI does not provide the explanations end-users are asking for [0.0]
  We discuss XAI's limitations in deployment and conclude that transparency alongside with rigorous validation are better suited to gaining trust in AI systems. XAI techniques are frequently required by users in many AI systems with the goal of understanding complex models, their associated predictions, and gaining trust.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T10:34:38Z)
• Trustworthy AI [75.99046162669997]
  Brittleness to minor adversarial changes in the input data, ability to explain the decisions, address the bias in their training data, are some of the most prominent limitations. We propose the tutorial on Trustworthy AI to address six critical issues in enhancing user and public trust in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-02T20:04:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.