An AI Theory of Mind Will Enhance Our Collective Intelligence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.09168v2
• Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2025 00:18:46 GMT
• Title: An AI Theory of Mind Will Enhance Our Collective Intelligence
• Authors: Michael S. Harré, Catherine Drysdale, Jaime Ruiz-Serra,
• Abstract summary: We show that flexible collective intelligence in human social settings is improved by a particular cognitive tool: our Theory of Mind.<n>To make this case, we consider the large-scale impact AI can have as agential actors in a'social ecology' rather than as mere technological tools.
• Score: 1.8434042562191815
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Collective intelligence plays a central role in many fields, from economics and evolutionary theory to neural networks and eusocial insects, and is also core to work on emergence and self-organisation in complex-systems theory. However, in human collective intelligence there is still much to understand about how specific psychological processes at the individual level give rise to self-organised structures at the social level. Psychological factors have so far played a minor role in collective-intelligence studies because the principles are often general and applicable to agents without sophisticated psychologies. We emphasise, with examples from other complex adaptive systems, the broad applicability of collective-intelligence principles, while noting that mechanisms and time scales differ markedly between cases. We review evidence that flexible collective intelligence in human social settings is improved by a particular cognitive tool: our Theory of Mind. We then hypothesise that AIs equipped with a theory of mind will enhance collective intelligence in ways similar to human contributions. To make this case, we step back from the algorithmic basis of AI psychology and consider the large-scale impact AI can have as agential actors in a 'social ecology' rather than as mere technological tools. We identify several key characteristics of psychologically mediated collective intelligence and show that the development of a Theory of Mind is crucial in distinguishing human social collective intelligence from more general forms. Finally, we illustrate how individuals, human or otherwise, integrate within a collective not by being genetically or algorithmically programmed, but by growing and adapting into the socio-cognitive niche they occupy. AI can likewise inhabit one or multiple such niches, facilitated by a Theory of Mind.

Related papers

• Advances and Challenges in Foundation Agents: From Brain-Inspired Intelligence to Evolutionary, Collaborative, and Safe Systems [133.45145180645537]
  The advent of large language models (LLMs) has catalyzed a transformative shift in artificial intelligence. As these agents increasingly drive AI research and practical applications, their design, evaluation, and continuous improvement present intricate, multifaceted challenges. This survey provides a comprehensive overview, framing intelligent agents within a modular, brain-inspired architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-31T18:00:29Z)
• Aligning Generalisation Between Humans and Machines [74.120848518198]
  AI technology can support humans in scientific discovery and forming decisions, but may also disrupt democracies and target individuals.<n>The responsible use of AI and its participation in human-AI teams increasingly shows the need for AI alignment.<n>A crucial yet often overlooked aspect of these interactions is the different ways in which humans and machines generalise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-23T18:36:07Z)
• Artificial Theory of Mind and Self-Guided Social Organisation [1.8434042562191815]
  One of the challenges artificial intelligence (AI) faces is how a collection of agents coordinate their behaviour to achieve goals that are not reachable by any single agent. We make the case for collective intelligence in a general setting, drawing on recent work from single neuron complexity in neural networks. We show how our social structures are influenced by our neuro-physiology, our psychology, and our language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T04:06:26Z)
• Socially-Minded Intelligence: How Individuals, Groups, and AI Systems Can Make Each-Other Smarter (or Not) [1.234954267400696]
  A core part of human intelligence is the ability to work flexibly with others to achieve both individual and collective goals. Existing approaches to intelligence typically focus either on the individual or the collective level of analysis. We argue that by focusing either on individual or collective intelligence without considering their interaction, existing conceptualizations of intelligence limit the potential of people and machines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-08T23:17:31Z)
• AI-enhanced Collective Intelligence [2.5063318977668465]
  Humans and AI possess complementary capabilities that can surpass the collective intelligence of either humans or AI in isolation. This review incorporates perspectives from complex network science to conceptualize a multilayer representation of human-AI collective intelligence. We explore how agents' diversity and interactions influence the system's collective intelligence and analyze real-world instances of AI-enhanced collective intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T16:11:15Z)
• Mathematics of multi-agent learning systems at the interface of game theory and artificial intelligence [0.8049333067399385]
  Evolutionary Game Theory and Artificial Intelligence are two fields that, at first glance, might seem distinct, but they have notable connections and intersections. The former focuses on the evolution of behaviors (or strategies) in a population, where individuals interact with others and update their strategies based on imitation (or social learning) The latter, meanwhile, is centered on machine learning algorithms and (deep) neural networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-09T17:36:54Z)
• Intelligence as a Measure of Consciousness [0.0]
  I argue that psychometric measures of intelligence, such as the g-factor or IQ, indirectly approximate the extent of conscious experience. Based on a broader source of both scientific and metaphysical theories of consciousness, I argue that all systems possess a degree of consciousness of ascertainable psychometrically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-30T17:15:04Z)
• COKE: A Cognitive Knowledge Graph for Machine Theory of Mind [87.14703659509502]
  Theory of mind (ToM) refers to humans' ability to understand and infer the desires, beliefs, and intentions of others. COKE is the first cognitive knowledge graph for machine theory of mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-09T12:36:58Z)
• Machine Psychology [54.287802134327485]
  We argue that a fruitful direction for research is engaging large language models in behavioral experiments inspired by psychology. We highlight theoretical perspectives, experimental paradigms, and computational analysis techniques that this approach brings to the table. It paves the way for a "machine psychology" for generative artificial intelligence (AI) that goes beyond performance benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-24T13:24:41Z)
• Neural Theory-of-Mind? On the Limits of Social Intelligence in Large LMs [77.88043871260466]
  We show that one of today's largest language models lacks this kind of social intelligence out-of-the box. We conclude that person-centric NLP approaches might be more effective towards neural Theory of Mind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-24T14:58:58Z)
• On the link between conscious function and general intelligence in humans and machines [0.9176056742068814]
  We look at the cognitive abilities associated with three theories of conscious function. We find that all three theories specifically relate conscious function to some aspect of domain-general intelligence in humans. We propose ways in which insights from each of the three theories may be combined into a unified model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-24T02:22:23Z)
• Social Neuro AI: Social Interaction as the "dark matter" of AI [0.0]
  We argue that empirical results from social psychology and social neuroscience along with the framework of dynamics can be of inspiration to the development of more intelligent artificial agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-31T13:41:53Z)
• AGENT: A Benchmark for Core Psychological Reasoning [60.35621718321559]
  Intuitive psychology is the ability to reason about hidden mental variables that drive observable actions. Despite recent interest in machine agents that reason about other agents, it is not clear if such agents learn or hold the core psychology principles that drive human reasoning. We present a benchmark consisting of procedurally generated 3D animations, AGENT, structured around four scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-24T14:58:23Z)
• On the Philosophical, Cognitive and Mathematical Foundations of Symbiotic Autonomous Systems (SAS) [87.3520234553785]
  Symbiotic Autonomous Systems (SAS) are advanced intelligent and cognitive systems exhibiting autonomous collective intelligence. This work presents a theoretical framework of SAS underpinned by the latest advances in intelligence, cognition, computer, and system sciences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-02-11T05:44:25Z)
• Future Trends for Human-AI Collaboration: A Comprehensive Taxonomy of AI/AGI Using Multiple Intelligences and Learning Styles [95.58955174499371]
  We describe various aspects of multiple human intelligences and learning styles, which may impact on a variety of AI problem domains. Future AI systems will be able not only to communicate with human users and each other, but also to efficiently exchange knowledge and wisdom.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-07T21:00:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.