AI-Spectra: A Visual Dashboard for Model Multiplicity to Enhance Informed and Transparent Decision-Making

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10490v1
• Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2024 18:50:41 GMT
• Title: AI-Spectra: A Visual Dashboard for Model Multiplicity to Enhance Informed and Transparent Decision-Making
• Authors: Gilles Eerlings, Sebe Vanbrabant, Jori Liesenborgs, Gustavo Rovelo Ruiz, Davy Vanacken, Kris Luyten,
• Abstract summary: We present an approach, AI-Spectra, to leverage model multiplicity for interactive systems. Model multiplicity means using slightly different AI models yielding equally valid outcomes or predictions for the same task. We use a custom adaptation of Chernoff faces for AI-Spectra; Chernoff Bots.
• Score: 1.860042727037436
• License:
• Abstract: We present an approach, AI-Spectra, to leverage model multiplicity for interactive systems. Model multiplicity means using slightly different AI models yielding equally valid outcomes or predictions for the same task, thus relying on many simultaneous "expert advisors" that can have different opinions. Dealing with multiple AI models that generate potentially divergent results for the same task is challenging for users to deal with. It helps users understand and identify AI models are not always correct and might differ, but it can also result in an information overload when being confronted with multiple results instead of one. AI-Spectra leverages model multiplicity by using a visual dashboard designed for conveying what AI models generate which results while minimizing the cognitive effort to detect consensus among models and what type of models might have different opinions. We use a custom adaptation of Chernoff faces for AI-Spectra; Chernoff Bots. This visualization technique lets users quickly interpret complex, multivariate model configurations and compare predictions across multiple models. Our design is informed by building on established Human-AI Interaction guidelines and well know practices in information visualization. We validated our approach through a series of experiments training a wide variation of models with the MNIST dataset to perform number recognition. Our work contributes to the growing discourse on making AI systems more transparent, trustworthy, and effective through the strategic use of multiple models.

Related papers

• Is my Data in your AI Model? Membership Inference Test with Application to Face Images [18.402616111394842]
  This article introduces the Membership Inference Test (MINT), a novel approach that aims to empirically assess if given data was used during the training of AI/ML models. We propose two MINT architectures designed to learn the distinct activation patterns that emerge when an Audited Model is exposed to data used during its training process. Experiments are carried out using six publicly available databases, comprising over 22 million face images in total.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T15:09:01Z)
• A comprehensible analysis of the efficacy of Ensemble Models for Bug Prediction [0.0]
  We present a comparison and analysis of the efficacy of two AI-based approaches, namely single AI models and ensemble AI models, for predicting the probability of a Java class being buggy. Our experimental findings indicate that the ensemble of AI models can outperform the results of applying individual AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-18T17:43:54Z)
• StableLLaVA: Enhanced Visual Instruction Tuning with Synthesized Image-Dialogue Data [129.92449761766025]
  We propose a novel data collection methodology that synchronously synthesizes images and dialogues for visual instruction tuning. This approach harnesses the power of generative models, marrying the abilities of ChatGPT and text-to-image generative models. Our research includes comprehensive experiments conducted on various datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-20T12:43:52Z)
• UniDiff: Advancing Vision-Language Models with Generative and Discriminative Learning [86.91893533388628]
  This paper presents UniDiff, a unified multi-modal model that integrates image-text contrastive learning (ITC), text-conditioned image synthesis learning (IS), and reciprocal semantic consistency modeling (RSC) UniDiff demonstrates versatility in both multi-modal understanding and generative tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-01T15:39:38Z)
• Dataless Knowledge Fusion by Merging Weights of Language Models [51.8162883997512]
  Fine-tuning pre-trained language models has become the prevalent paradigm for building downstream NLP models. This creates a barrier to fusing knowledge across individual models to yield a better single model. We propose a dataless knowledge fusion method that merges models in their parameter space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-19T20:46:43Z)
• Composing Ensembles of Pre-trained Models via Iterative Consensus [95.10641301155232]
  We propose a unified framework for composing ensembles of different pre-trained models. We use pre-trained models as "generators" or "scorers" and compose them via closed-loop iterative consensus optimization. We demonstrate that consensus achieved by an ensemble of scorers outperforms the feedback of a single scorer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-20T18:46:31Z)
• Multi-Modal Experience Inspired AI Creation [33.34566822058209]
  We study how to generate texts based on sequential multi-modal information. We firstly design a multi-channel sequence-to-sequence architecture equipped with a multi-modal attention network. We then propose a curriculum negative sampling strategy tailored for the sequential inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-02T11:50:41Z)
• MultiViz: An Analysis Benchmark for Visualizing and Understanding Multimodal Models [103.9987158554515]
  MultiViz is a method for analyzing the behavior of multimodal models by scaffolding the problem of interpretability into 4 stages. We show that the complementary stages in MultiViz together enable users to simulate model predictions, assign interpretable concepts to features, perform error analysis on model misclassifications, and use insights from error analysis to debug models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T18:42:06Z)
• DIME: Fine-grained Interpretations of Multimodal Models via Disentangled Local Explanations [119.1953397679783]
  We focus on advancing the state-of-the-art in interpreting multimodal models. Our proposed approach, DIME, enables accurate and fine-grained analysis of multimodal models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T20:52:47Z)
• Distill on the Go: Online knowledge distillation in self-supervised learning [1.1470070927586016]
  Recent works have shown that wider and deeper models benefit more from self-supervised learning than smaller models. We propose Distill-on-the-Go (DoGo), a self-supervised learning paradigm using single-stage online knowledge distillation. Our results show significant performance gain in the presence of noisy and limited labels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-20T09:59:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.