On the Compatibility of Generative AI and Generative Linguistics

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10533v2
• Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 17:40:03 GMT
• Title: On the Compatibility of Generative AI and Generative Linguistics
• Authors: Eva Portelance, Masoud Jasbi,
• Abstract summary: We argue that generative AI is compatible with generative linguistics.<n> LMs can be a major asset for Chomsky's minimalist approach to Universal Grammar and language acquisition.
• Score: 0.20923359361008084
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: In mid-20th century, the linguist Noam Chomsky established generative linguistics, and made significant contributions to linguistics, computer science, and cognitive science by developing the computational and philosophical foundations for a theory that defined language as a formal system, instantiated in human minds or artificial machines. These developments in turn ushered a wave of research on symbolic Artificial Intelligence (AI). More recently, a new wave of non-symbolic AI has emerged with neural Language Models (LMs) that exhibit impressive linguistic performance, leading many to question the older approach and wonder about the the compatibility of generative AI and generative linguistics. In this paper, we argue that generative AI is compatible with generative linguistics and reinforces its basic tenets in at least three ways. First, we argue that LMs are formal generative models as intended originally in Chomsky's work on formal language theory. Second, LMs can help develop a program for discovery procedures as defined by Chomsky's "Syntactic Structures". Third, LMs can be a major asset for Chomsky's minimalist approach to Universal Grammar and language acquisition. In turn, generative linguistics can provide the foundation for evaluating and improving LMs as well as other generative computational models of language.

Related papers

• Training Neural Networks as Recognizers of Formal Languages [87.06906286950438]
  We train and evaluate neural networks directly as binary classifiers of strings. We provide results on a variety of languages across the Chomsky hierarchy for three neural architectures. Our contributions will facilitate theoretically sound empirical testing of language recognition claims in future work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T16:33:25Z)
• Generative linguistics contribution to artificial intelligence: Where this contribution lies? [0.0]
  The article walks the researcher/reader through the scientific theorems and rationales involved in AI which belong to GL. It concludes that however the huge GL contribution to AI, there are still points of divergence including the nature and type of language input.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T16:27:34Z)
• Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Next-Generation Language Models for Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (NeLaMKRR 2024) [16.282850445579857]
  Reasoning is an essential component of human intelligence as it plays a fundamental role in our ability to think critically. Recent leap forward in natural language processing, with the emergence of language models based on transformers, is hinting at the possibility that these models exhibit reasoning abilities. Despite ongoing discussions about what reasoning is in language models, it is still not easy to pin down to what extent these models are actually capable of reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-07T02:31:47Z)
• Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Systematic Review and Applications [7.729155237285151]
  This paper documents the systematic review and analysis of recent advancements and techniques in Generative AI. The major impact that generative AI has made to date, has been in language generation with the development of large language models. The paper ends with a discussion of Responsible AI principles, and the necessary ethical considerations for the sustainability and growth of these generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-17T18:03:59Z)
• Language Evolution with Deep Learning [49.879239655532324]
  Computational modeling plays an essential role in the study of language emergence. It aims to simulate the conditions and learning processes that could trigger the emergence of a structured language. This chapter explores another class of computational models that have recently revolutionized the field of machine learning: deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T16:52:54Z)
• A Philosophical Introduction to Language Models -- Part I: Continuity With Classic Debates [0.05657375260432172]
  This article serves both as a primer on language models for philosophers, and as an opinionated survey of their significance. We argue that the success of language models challenges several long-held assumptions about artificial neural networks. This sets the stage for the companion paper (Part II), which turns to novel empirical methods for probing the inner workings of language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-08T14:12:31Z)
• Formal Aspects of Language Modeling [74.16212987886013]
  Large language models have become one of the most commonly deployed NLP inventions. These notes are the accompaniment to the theoretical portion of the ETH Z"urich course on large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T20:21:42Z)
• Beyond Words: A Mathematical Framework for Interpreting Large Language Models [8.534513717370434]
  Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI tools that can generate and comprehend natural language text and other complex information. We propose Hex a framework that clarifies key terms and concepts in LLM research, such as hallucinations, alignment, self-verification and chain-of-thought reasoning. We argue that our formal definitions and results are crucial for advancing the discussion on how to build generative AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-06T11:13:17Z)
• Large Language Models for Scientific Synthesis, Inference and Explanation [56.41963802804953]
  We show how large language models can perform scientific synthesis, inference, and explanation. We show that the large language model can augment this "knowledge" by synthesizing from the scientific literature. This approach has the further advantage that the large language model can explain the machine learning system's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T02:17:59Z)
• Rethinking the Evaluating Framework for Natural Language Understanding in AI Systems: Language Acquisition as a Core for Future Metrics [0.0]
  In the burgeoning field of artificial intelligence (AI), the unprecedented progress of large language models (LLMs) in natural language processing (NLP) offers an opportunity to revisit the entire approach of traditional metrics of machine intelligence. Our paper proposes a paradigm shift from the established Turing Test towards an all-embracing framework that hinges on language acquisition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T11:34:52Z)
• The Neuro-Symbolic Inverse Planning Engine (NIPE): Modeling Probabilistic Social Inferences from Linguistic Inputs [50.32802502923367]
  We study the process of language driving and influencing social reasoning in a probabilistic goal inference domain. We propose a neuro-symbolic model that carries out goal inference from linguistic inputs of agent scenarios. Our model closely matches human response patterns and better predicts human judgements than using an LLM alone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-25T19:38:01Z)
• From Word Models to World Models: Translating from Natural Language to the Probabilistic Language of Thought [124.40905824051079]
  We propose rational meaning construction, a computational framework for language-informed thinking. We frame linguistic meaning as a context-sensitive mapping from natural language into a probabilistic language of thought. We show that LLMs can generate context-sensitive translations that capture pragmatically-appropriate linguistic meanings. We extend our framework to integrate cognitively-motivated symbolic modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-22T05:14:00Z)
• Why can neural language models solve next-word prediction? A mathematical perspective [53.807657273043446]
  We study a class of formal languages that can be used to model real-world examples of English sentences. Our proof highlights the different roles of the embedding layer and the fully connected component within the neural language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T10:41:23Z)
• Understanding Natural Language Understanding Systems. A Critical Analysis [91.81211519327161]
  The development of machines that guillemotlefttalk like usguillemotright, also known as Natural Language Understanding (NLU) systems, is the Holy Grail of Artificial Intelligence (AI) But never has the trust that we can build guillemotlefttalking machinesguillemotright been stronger than the one engendered by the last generation of NLU systems. Are we at the dawn of a new era, in which the Grail is finally closer to us?
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T08:32:55Z)
• Language Models as Inductive Reasoners [125.99461874008703]
  We propose a new paradigm (task) for inductive reasoning, which is to induce natural language rules from natural language facts. We create a dataset termed DEER containing 1.2k rule-fact pairs for the task, where rules and facts are written in natural language. We provide the first and comprehensive analysis of how well pretrained language models can induce natural language rules from natural language facts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-21T11:12:14Z)
• Language Models are not Models of Language [0.0]
  Transfer learning has enabled large deep learning neural networks trained on the language modeling task to vastly improve performance. We argue that the term language model is misleading because deep learning models are not theoretical models of language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-13T22:39:46Z)
• Language Modelling as a Multi-Task Problem [12.48699285085636]
  We investigate whether language models adhere to learning principles of multi-task learning during training. Experiments demonstrate that a multi-task setting naturally emerges within the objective of the more general task of language modelling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-27T09:47:42Z)
• Machine Common Sense [77.34726150561087]
  Machine common sense remains a broad, potentially unbounded problem in artificial intelligence (AI) This article deals with the aspects of modeling commonsense reasoning focusing on such domain as interpersonal interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-15T13:59:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.