Benchmarking pre-trained text embedding models in aligning built asset information
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.12056v1
- Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 20:54:17 GMT
- Title: Benchmarking pre-trained text embedding models in aligning built asset information
- Authors: Mehrzad Shahinmoghadam, Ali Motamedi,
- Abstract summary: This study presents a comparative benchmark of state-of-the-art text embedding models to evaluate their effectiveness in aligning built asset information with domain-specific technical concepts.
The results of our benchmarking across six proposed datasets, covering three tasks of clustering, retrieval, and reranking, highlight the need for future research on domain adaptation techniques.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: Accurate mapping of the built asset information to established data classification systems and taxonomies is crucial for effective asset management, whether for compliance at project handover or ad-hoc data integration scenarios. Due to the complex nature of built asset data, which predominantly comprises technical text elements, this process remains largely manual and reliant on domain expert input. Recent breakthroughs in contextual text representation learning (text embedding), particularly through pre-trained large language models, offer promising approaches that can facilitate the automation of cross-mapping of the built asset data. However, no comprehensive evaluation has yet been conducted to assess these models' ability to effectively represent the complex semantics specific to built asset technical terminology. This study presents a comparative benchmark of state-of-the-art text embedding models to evaluate their effectiveness in aligning built asset information with domain-specific technical concepts. Our proposed datasets are derived from two renowned built asset data classification dictionaries. The results of our benchmarking across six proposed datasets, covering three tasks of clustering, retrieval, and reranking, highlight the need for future research on domain adaptation techniques. The benchmarking resources are published as an open-source library, which will be maintained and extended to support future evaluations in this field.
Related papers
- Context is Key: A Benchmark for Forecasting with Essential Textual Information [87.3175915185287]
"Context is Key" (CiK) is a time series forecasting benchmark that pairs numerical data with diverse types of carefully crafted textual context.
We evaluate a range of approaches, including statistical models, time series foundation models, and LLM-based forecasters.
Our experiments highlight the importance of incorporating contextual information, demonstrate surprising performance when using LLM-based forecasting models, and also reveal some of their critical shortcomings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T17:56:08Z) - MaterioMiner -- An ontology-based text mining dataset for extraction of process-structure-property entities [0.0]
We present the MaterioMiner dataset and the materials ontology where ontological concepts are associated with textual entities.
We explore the consistency between the three raters and perform fine-process-trained models to showcase the feasibility of named-process recognition model training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-05T21:42:59Z) - Learning to Extract Structured Entities Using Language Models [52.281701191329]
Recent advances in machine learning have significantly impacted the field of information extraction.
We reformulate the task to be entity-centric, enabling the use of diverse metrics.
We contribute to the field by introducing Structured Entity Extraction and proposing the Approximate Entity Set OverlaP metric.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-06T22:15:09Z) - GPT Struct Me: Probing GPT Models on Narrative Entity Extraction [2.049592435988883]
We evaluate the capabilities of two state-of-the-art language models -- GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 -- in the extraction of narrative entities.
This study is conducted on the Text2Story Lusa dataset, a collection of 119 Portuguese news articles.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-24T16:19:04Z) - Beyond Accuracy: Measuring Representation Capacity of Embeddings to
Preserve Structural and Contextual Information [1.8130068086063336]
We propose a method to measure the textitrepresentation capacity of embeddings.
The motivation behind this work stems from the importance of understanding the strengths and limitations of embeddings.
The proposed method not only contributes to advancing the field of embedding evaluation but also empowers researchers and practitioners with a quantitative measure.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-20T13:21:12Z) - Leveraging Contextual Information for Effective Entity Salience Detection [21.30389576465761]
We show that fine-tuning medium-sized language models with a cross-encoder style architecture yields substantial performance gains over feature engineering approaches.
We also show that zero-shot prompting of instruction-tuned language models yields inferior results, indicating the task's uniqueness and complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-14T19:04:40Z) - Modeling Entities as Semantic Points for Visual Information Extraction
in the Wild [55.91783742370978]
We propose an alternative approach to precisely and robustly extract key information from document images.
We explicitly model entities as semantic points, i.e., center points of entities are enriched with semantic information describing the attributes and relationships of different entities.
The proposed method can achieve significantly enhanced performance on entity labeling and linking, compared with previous state-of-the-art models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-23T08:21:16Z) - Few-Shot Named Entity Recognition: A Comprehensive Study [92.40991050806544]
We investigate three schemes to improve the model generalization ability for few-shot settings.
We perform empirical comparisons on 10 public NER datasets with various proportions of labeled data.
We create new state-of-the-art results on both few-shot and training-free settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-12-29T23:43:16Z) - Summary-Source Proposition-level Alignment: Task, Datasets and
Supervised Baseline [94.0601799665342]
Aligning sentences in a reference summary with their counterparts in source documents was shown as a useful auxiliary summarization task.
We propose establishing summary-source alignment as an explicit task, while introducing two major novelties.
We create a novel training dataset for proposition-level alignment, derived automatically from available summarization evaluation data.
We present a supervised proposition alignment baseline model, showing improved alignment-quality over the unsupervised approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-01T17:27:12Z) - Exploiting Structured Knowledge in Text via Graph-Guided Representation
Learning [73.0598186896953]
We present two self-supervised tasks learning over raw text with the guidance from knowledge graphs.
Building upon entity-level masked language models, our first contribution is an entity masking scheme.
In contrast to existing paradigms, our approach uses knowledge graphs implicitly, only during pre-training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-04-29T14:22:42Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.