An Attention-based Framework for Fair Contrastive Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14765v1
• Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 07:11:35 GMT
• Title: An Attention-based Framework for Fair Contrastive Learning
• Authors: Stefan K. Nielsen, Tan M. Nguyen,
• Abstract summary: We propose a new method for fair contrastive learning that employs an attention mechanism to model bias-causing interactions. Our attention mechanism avoids bias-causing samples that confound the model and focuses on bias-reducing samples that help learn semantically meaningful representations.
• Score: 2.1605931466490795
• License:
• Abstract: Contrastive learning has proven instrumental in learning unbiased representations of data, especially in complex environments characterized by high-cardinality and high-dimensional sensitive information. However, existing approaches within this setting require predefined modelling assumptions of bias-causing interactions that limit the model's ability to learn debiased representations. In this work, we propose a new method for fair contrastive learning that employs an attention mechanism to model bias-causing interactions, enabling the learning of a fairer and semantically richer embedding space. In particular, our attention mechanism avoids bias-causing samples that confound the model and focuses on bias-reducing samples that help learn semantically meaningful representations. We verify the advantages of our method against existing baselines in fair contrastive learning and show that our approach can significantly boost bias removal from learned representations without compromising downstream accuracy.

Related papers

• Utilizing Adversarial Examples for Bias Mitigation and Accuracy Enhancement [3.0820287240219795]
  We propose a novel approach to mitigate biases in computer vision models by utilizing counterfactual generation and fine-tuning. Our approach leverages a curriculum learning framework combined with a fine-grained adversarial loss to fine-tune the model using adversarial examples. We validate our approach through both qualitative and quantitative assessments, demonstrating improved bias mitigation and accuracy compared to existing methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-18T00:41:32Z)
• Using Positive Matching Contrastive Loss with Facial Action Units to mitigate bias in Facial Expression Recognition [6.015556590955814]
  We propose to mitigate bias by guiding the model's focus towards task-relevant features using domain knowledge. We show that incorporating task-relevant features via our method can improve model fairness at minimal cost to classification performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-08T21:28:02Z)
• Debiasing Vision-Language Models via Biased Prompts [79.04467131711775]
  We propose a general approach for debiasing vision-language foundation models by projecting out biased directions in the text embedding. We show that debiasing only the text embedding with a calibrated projection matrix suffices to yield robust classifiers and fair generative models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-31T20:09:33Z)
• Bias-inducing geometries: an exactly solvable data model with fairness implications [13.690313475721094]
  We introduce an exactly solvable high-dimensional model of data imbalance. We analytically unpack the typical properties of learning models trained in this synthetic framework. We obtain exact predictions for the observables that are commonly employed for fairness assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-31T16:27:57Z)
• Causal Disentanglement for Semantics-Aware Intent Learning in Recommendation [30.85573846018658]
  We propose an unbiased and semantics-aware disentanglement learning called CaDSI. CaDSI explicitly models the causal relations underlying recommendation task. It produces semantics-aware representations via disentangling users true intents aware of specific item context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-05T15:17:03Z)
• Contrastive Learning for Fair Representations [50.95604482330149]
  Trained classification models can unintentionally lead to biased representations and predictions. Existing debiasing methods for classification models, such as adversarial training, are often expensive to train and difficult to optimise. We propose a method for mitigating bias by incorporating contrastive learning, in which instances sharing the same class label are encouraged to have similar representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-22T10:47:51Z)
• Learning Bias-Invariant Representation by Cross-Sample Mutual Information Minimization [77.8735802150511]
  We propose a cross-sample adversarial debiasing (CSAD) method to remove the bias information misused by the target task. The correlation measurement plays a critical role in adversarial debiasing and is conducted by a cross-sample neural mutual information estimator. We conduct thorough experiments on publicly available datasets to validate the advantages of the proposed method over state-of-the-art approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-11T21:17:02Z)
• A Low Rank Promoting Prior for Unsupervised Contrastive Learning [108.91406719395417]
  We construct a novel probabilistic graphical model that effectively incorporates the low rank promoting prior into the framework of contrastive learning. Our hypothesis explicitly requires that all the samples belonging to the same instance class lie on the same subspace with small dimension. Empirical evidences show that the proposed algorithm clearly surpasses the state-of-the-art approaches on multiple benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-05T15:58:25Z)
• Beyond Trivial Counterfactual Explanations with Diverse Valuable Explanations [64.85696493596821]
  In computer vision applications, generative counterfactual methods indicate how to perturb a model's input to change its prediction. We propose a counterfactual method that learns a perturbation in a disentangled latent space that is constrained using a diversity-enforcing loss. Our model improves the success rate of producing high-quality valuable explanations when compared to previous state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-18T12:57:34Z)
• Learning from others' mistakes: Avoiding dataset biases without modeling them [111.17078939377313]
  State-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models often learn to model dataset biases and surface form correlations instead of features that target the intended task. Previous work has demonstrated effective methods to circumvent these issues when knowledge of the bias is available. We show a method for training models that learn to ignore these problematic correlations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-02T16:10:54Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.